From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Cc: <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
<daniel@iogearbox.net>, <jordan@jrife.io>, <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 bpf-next 03/10] bpf: tcp: Get rid of st_bucket_done
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 16:17:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250521231755.91774-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250521225800.89218-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 15:57:59 -0700
> From: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
> Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 07:50:50 -0700
> > Get rid of the st_bucket_done field to simplify TCP iterator state and
> > logic. Before, st_bucket_done could be false if bpf_iter_tcp_batch
> > returned a partial batch; however, with the last patch ("bpf: tcp: Make
> > sure iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot"),
> > st_bucket_done == true is equivalent to iter->cur_sk == iter->end_sk.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
> > ---
> > net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 14 ++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> > index 27022018194a..20730723a02c 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> > @@ -3020,7 +3020,6 @@ struct bpf_tcp_iter_state {
> > unsigned int end_sk;
> > unsigned int max_sk;
> > struct sock **batch;
> > - bool st_bucket_done;
> > };
> >
> > struct bpf_iter__tcp {
> > @@ -3043,8 +3042,10 @@ static int tcp_prog_seq_show(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_iter_meta *meta,
> >
> > static void bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter)
> > {
> > - while (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
> > - sock_gen_put(iter->batch[iter->cur_sk++]);
> > + unsigned int cur_sk = iter->cur_sk;
> > +
> > + while (cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
> > + sock_gen_put(iter->batch[cur_sk++]);
>
> Why is this chunk included in this patch ?
This should be in patch 5 to keep cur_sk for find_cookie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-21 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-20 14:50 [PATCH v1 bpf-next 00/10] bpf: tcp: Exactly-once socket iteration Jordan Rife
2025-05-20 14:50 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 01/10] bpf: tcp: Make mem flags configurable through bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch Jordan Rife
2025-05-21 18:54 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-20 14:50 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 02/10] bpf: tcp: Make sure iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot Jordan Rife
2025-05-21 22:20 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-20 14:50 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 03/10] bpf: tcp: Get rid of st_bucket_done Jordan Rife
2025-05-21 22:57 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-21 23:17 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2025-05-22 18:16 ` Jordan Rife
2025-05-22 20:42 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-23 22:07 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-05-24 21:09 ` Jordan Rife
2025-05-27 18:19 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-05-20 14:50 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 04/10] bpf: tcp: Use bpf_tcp_iter_batch_item for bpf_tcp_iter_state batch items Jordan Rife
2025-05-21 22:59 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-20 14:50 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 05/10] bpf: tcp: Avoid socket skips and repeats during iteration Jordan Rife
2025-05-23 23:05 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-05-24 1:24 ` Jordan Rife
2025-05-20 14:50 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 06/10] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bucket resume logic in listening sockets Jordan Rife
2025-05-20 14:50 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 07/10] selftests/bpf: Allow for iteration over multiple ports Jordan Rife
2025-05-20 14:50 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 08/10] selftests/bpf: Make ehash buckets configurable in socket iterator tests Jordan Rife
2025-05-20 14:50 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 09/10] selftests/bpf: Create established sockets " Jordan Rife
2025-05-20 14:50 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 10/10] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bucket resume logic in established sockets Jordan Rife
2025-05-28 0:51 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-05-28 18:32 ` Jordan Rife
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250521231755.91774-1-kuniyu@amazon.com \
--to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jordan@jrife.io \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox