From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf, sockmap: Fix psock incorrectly pointing to sk
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 07:24:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250605142448.3llri3w7wbclfxwc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fefe50c6ec558074ec7de944175cec82bb426f10@linux.dev>
On 2025-05-29 02:42:14, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> May 29, 2025 at 07:46, "John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> > On 2025-05-24 00:22:19, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > We observed an issue from the latest selftest: sockmap_redir where
> > >
> > > sk_psock(psock->sk) != psock in the backlog. The root cause is the special
> > > behavior in sockmap_redir - it frequently performs map_update() and
> > > map_delete() on the same socket. During map_update(), we create a new
> > > psock and during map_delete(), we eventually free the psock via rcu_work
> > > in sk_psock_drop(). However, pending workqueues might still exist and not
> > > be processed yet. If users immediately perform another map_update(), a new
> > > psock will be allocated for the same sk, resulting in two psocks pointing
> > > to the same sk.
[...]
> >
> > Can we add this to sk_psock_stop where we have the TX_ENABLED bit
> >
> > cleared.
>
>
>
> Thanks, I just add SK_PSOCK_TX_ENABLED checking at the start of sk_psock_backlog().
> Every works fine, and truly no more flag needed !
>
> diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
> index 34c51eb1a14f..83c78379932e 100644
> --- a/net/core/skmsg.c
> +++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
> @@ -656,6 +656,13 @@ static void sk_psock_backlog(struct work_struct *work)
> bool ingress;
> int ret;
>
> + /* If sk is quickly removed from the map and then added back, the old
> + * psock should not be scheduled, because there are now two psocks
> + * pointing to the same sk.
> + */
> + if (!sk_psock_test_state(psock, SK_PSOCK_TX_ENABLED))
> + return;
> +
> /* Increment the psock refcnt to synchronize with close(fd) path in
> * sock_map_close(), ensuring we wait for backlog thread completion
> * before sk_socket freed. If refcnt increment fails, it indicates
>
Thanks. Please submit an official patch so we can get it merged.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-05 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-23 16:22 [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf, sockmap: Fix psock incorrectly pointing to sk Jiayuan Chen
2025-05-28 23:46 ` John Fastabend
2025-05-29 2:42 ` Jiayuan Chen
2025-06-05 14:24 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2025-05-29 5:22 ` Jiayuan Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250605142448.3llri3w7wbclfxwc@gmail.com \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox