BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	kernel-team@fb.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/11] bpf: move REG_LIVE_DONE check to clean_live_states()
Date: Fri,  6 Jun 2025 14:03:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250606210352.1692944-8-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250606210352.1692944-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>

The next patch would add some relatively heavy-weight operation to
clean_live_states(), this operation can be skipped if REG_LIVE_DONE
is set. Move the check from clean_verifier_state() to
clean_verifier_state() as a small refactoring commit.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 8e2062e38307..4dd95f34f7fd 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -18290,10 +18290,6 @@ static void clean_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 {
 	int i;
 
-	if (st->frame[0]->regs[0].live & REG_LIVE_DONE)
-		/* all regs in this state in all frames were already marked */
-		return;
-
 	for (i = 0; i <= st->curframe; i++)
 		clean_func_state(env, st->frame[i]);
 }
@@ -18348,6 +18344,9 @@ static void clean_live_states(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn,
 		if (sl->state.insn_idx != insn ||
 		    !same_callsites(&sl->state, cur))
 			continue;
+		if (sl->state.frame[0]->regs[0].live & REG_LIVE_DONE)
+			/* all regs in this state in all frames were already marked */
+			continue;
 		clean_verifier_state(env, &sl->state);
 	}
 }
-- 
2.48.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-06 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-06 21:03 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/11] bpf: propagate read/precision marks over state graph backedges Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-06 21:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/11] Revert "bpf: use common instruction history across all states" Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-06 21:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/11] bpf: compute SCCs in program control flow graph Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-06 21:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/11] bpf: frame_insn_idx() utility function Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-06 21:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/11] bpf: starting_state parameter for __mark_chain_precision() Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-06 21:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/11] bpf: set 'changed' status if propagate_precision() did any updates Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-06 21:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/11] bpf: set 'changed' status if propagate_liveness() " Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-06 21:03 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2025-06-06 21:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/11] bpf: propagate read/precision marks over state graph backedges Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-06 21:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/11] bpf: remove {update,get}_loop_entry functions Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-06 21:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/11] bpf: include backedges in peak_states stat Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-06 21:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/11] selftests/bpf: tests with a loop state missing read/precision mark Eduard Zingerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250606210352.1692944-8-eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox