From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf, sockmap: Fix psock incorrectly pointing to sk
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 10:59:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250609025908.79331-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> (raw)
We observed an issue from the latest selftest: sockmap_redir where
sk_psock(psock->sk) != psock in the backlog. The root cause is the special
behavior in sockmap_redir - it frequently performs map_update() and
map_delete() on the same socket. During map_update(), we create a new
psock and during map_delete(), we eventually free the psock via rcu_work
in sk_psock_drop(). However, pending workqueues might still exist and not
be processed yet. If users immediately perform another map_update(), a new
psock will be allocated for the same sk, resulting in two psocks pointing
to the same sk.
When the pending workqueue is later triggered, it uses the old psock to
access sk for I/O operations, which is incorrect.
Timing Diagram:
cpu0 cpu1
map_update(sk):
sk->psock = psock1
psock1->sk = sk
map_delete(sk):
rcu_work_free(psock1)
map_update(sk):
sk->psock = psock2
psock2->sk = sk
workqueue:
wakeup with psock1, but the sk of psock1
doesn't belong to psock1
rcu_handler:
clean psock1
free(psock1)
Previously, we used reference counting to address the concurrency issue
between backlog and sock_map_close(). This logic remains necessary as it
prevents the sk from being freed while processing the backlog. But this
patch prevents pending backlogs from using a psock after it has been
stopped.
Note: We cannot call cancel_delayed_work_sync() in map_delete() since this
might be invoked in BPF context by BPF helper, and the function may sleep.
Fixes: 604326b41a6f ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface")
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
---
V1->V2: Use existing flag instead of adding new one.
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250605142448.3llri3w7wbclfxwc@gmail.com/
Thanks to Michal Luczaj for providing the sockmap_redir test case, which
indeed covers almost all sockmap forwarding paths.
---
net/core/skmsg.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
index 34c51eb1a14f..83c78379932e 100644
--- a/net/core/skmsg.c
+++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
@@ -656,6 +656,13 @@ static void sk_psock_backlog(struct work_struct *work)
bool ingress;
int ret;
+ /* If sk is quickly removed from the map and then added back, the old
+ * psock should not be scheduled, because there are now two psocks
+ * pointing to the same sk.
+ */
+ if (!sk_psock_test_state(psock, SK_PSOCK_TX_ENABLED))
+ return;
+
/* Increment the psock refcnt to synchronize with close(fd) path in
* sock_map_close(), ensuring we wait for backlog thread completion
* before sk_socket freed. If refcnt increment fails, it indicates
--
2.47.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-06-09 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-09 2:59 Jiayuan Chen [this message]
2025-06-09 4:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf, sockmap: Fix psock incorrectly pointing to sk John Fastabend
2025-06-10 17:54 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250609025908.79331-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--to=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).