bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/3] selftests/bpf: Fix two net related test failures with 64K page size
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 20:50:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250612035037.2207911-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250612035027.2207299-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

When running BPF selftests on arm64 with a 64K page size, I encountered
the following two test failures:
  sockmap_basic/sockmap skb_verdict change tail:FAIL
  tc_change_tail:FAIL

With further debugging, I identified the root cause in the following
kernel code within __bpf_skb_change_tail():

    u32 max_len = BPF_SKB_MAX_LEN;
    u32 min_len = __bpf_skb_min_len(skb);
    int ret;

    if (unlikely(flags || new_len > max_len || new_len < min_len))
        return -EINVAL;

With a 4K page size, new_len = 65535 and max_len = 16064, the function
returns -EINVAL. However, With a 64K page size, max_len increases to
261824, allowing execution to proceed further in the function. This is
because BPF_SKB_MAX_LEN scales with the page size and larger page sizes
result in higher max_len values.

Updating the new_len parameter in both tests based on actual kernel
page size resolved both failures.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_change_tail.c |  9 +++++++--
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_change_tail.c      | 14 +++++++-------
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_change_tail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_change_tail.c
index 2796dd8545eb..1c7941a4ad00 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_change_tail.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_change_tail.c
@@ -1,8 +1,13 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 /* Copyright (c) 2024 ByteDance */
-#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include "vmlinux.h"
 #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
 
+#ifndef PAGE_SIZE
+#define PAGE_SIZE __PAGE_SIZE
+#endif
+#define BPF_SKB_MAX_LEN (PAGE_SIZE << 2)
+
 struct {
 	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP);
 	__uint(max_entries, 1);
@@ -31,7 +36,7 @@ int prog_skb_verdict(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 		change_tail_ret = bpf_skb_change_tail(skb, skb->len + 1, 0);
 		return SK_PASS;
 	} else if (data[0] == 'E') { /* Error */
-		change_tail_ret = bpf_skb_change_tail(skb, 65535, 0);
+		change_tail_ret = bpf_skb_change_tail(skb, BPF_SKB_MAX_LEN, 0);
 		return SK_PASS;
 	}
 	return SK_PASS;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_change_tail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_change_tail.c
index 28edafe803f0..fcba8299f0bc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_change_tail.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_change_tail.c
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include "vmlinux.h"
 #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
-#include <linux/if_ether.h>
-#include <linux/in.h>
-#include <linux/ip.h>
-#include <linux/udp.h>
-#include <linux/pkt_cls.h>
+
+#ifndef PAGE_SIZE
+#define PAGE_SIZE __PAGE_SIZE
+#endif
+#define BPF_SKB_MAX_LEN (PAGE_SIZE << 2)
 
 long change_tail_ret = 1;
 
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ int change_tail(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 			bpf_skb_change_tail(skb, len, 0);
 		return TCX_PASS;
 	} else if (payload[0] == 'E') { /* Error */
-		change_tail_ret = bpf_skb_change_tail(skb, 65535, 0);
+		change_tail_ret = bpf_skb_change_tail(skb, BPF_SKB_MAX_LEN, 0);
 		return TCX_PASS;
 	} else if (payload[0] == 'Z') { /* Zero */
 		change_tail_ret = bpf_skb_change_tail(skb, 0, 0);
-- 
2.47.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-12  3:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-12  3:50 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] bpf: Fix a few test failures with 64K page size Yonghong Song
2025-06-12  3:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/3] bpf: Fix an issue in bpf_prog_test_run_xdp when page size greater than 4K Yonghong Song
2025-06-12  3:50 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2025-06-12  3:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/3] selftests/bpf: Fix xdp_do_redirect failure with 64KB page size Yonghong Song
2025-06-12  3:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] bpf: Fix a few test failures with 64K " Yonghong Song
2025-06-13  2:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250612035037.2207911-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).