From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, kernel-team@fb.com,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] bpf: allow void* cast using bpf_rdonly_cast()
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 11:24:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250625182414.30659-1-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
Currently, pointers returned by `bpf_rdonly_cast()` have a type of
"pointer to btf id", and only casts to structure types are allowed.
Access to memory pointed to by these pointers is done through
`BPF_PROBE_{MEM,MEMSX}` instructions and does not produce errors on
invalid memory access.
This patch set extends `bpf_rdonly_cast()` to allow casts to an
equivalent of 'void *', effectively replacing
`bpf_probe_read_kernel()` calls in situations where access to
individual bytes or integers is necessary.
The mechanism was suggested and explored by Andrii Nakryiko in [1].
To help with detecting support for this feature, an
`enum bpf_features` is added with intended usage as follows:
if (bpf_core_enum_value_exists(enum bpf_features,
BPF_FEAT_RDONLY_CAST_TO_VOID))
...
[1] https://github.com/anakryiko/linux/tree/bpf-mem-cast
Changelog:
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250625000520.2700423-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
v2 -> v3:
- dropped direct numbering for __MAX_BPF_FEAT.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250624191009.902874-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
v1 -> v2:
- renamed BPF_FEAT_TOTAL to __MAX_BPF_FEAT and moved patch introducing
bpf_features enum to the start of the series (Alexei);
- dropped patch #3 allowing optout from CAP_SYS_ADMIN drop in
prog_tests/verifier.c, use a separate runner in prog_tests/*
instead.
Eduard Zingerman (3):
bpf: add bpf_features enum
bpf: allow void* cast using bpf_rdonly_cast()
selftests/bpf: check operations on untrusted ro pointers to mem
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 79 ++++++++--
.../bpf/prog_tests/mem_rdonly_untrusted.c | 9 ++
.../bpf/progs/mem_rdonly_untrusted.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mem_rdonly_untrusted.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mem_rdonly_untrusted.c
--
2.47.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-06-25 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-25 18:24 Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2025-06-25 18:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/3] bpf: add bpf_features enum Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-25 18:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/3] bpf: allow void* cast using bpf_rdonly_cast() Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-25 18:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/3] selftests/bpf: check operations on untrusted ro pointers to mem Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-25 19:38 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-06-25 19:46 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-25 22:14 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-25 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] bpf: allow void* cast using bpf_rdonly_cast() Andrii Nakryiko
2025-06-25 22:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250625182414.30659-1-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox