From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F216C2C178E; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 23:19:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752621554; cv=none; b=FUuJH470nVw6VuX/iZNSwQc4i6xFgmt5nHEjdiZ1+ugf4FFASNtXLPWlRcjBsXmNII9lbPqoXpj+HH27dtXigUl40VobmuQ9Xz7GAR/9l69bi1DoRyxAUqTvaPWYw4QtqQqdqL6G0fz5MXfOpgdkiwgG+bdcieg/KS+MXBcjnuc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752621554; c=relaxed/simple; bh=K820+iBNMoJZqAsuKkgRQGrNMefBkmNasJMHvGIYUSM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KFKYbfReX4j08BfNKAeAN0FLBX0zIsCm9Uo0GmGW/SaIO31WG6uFWTGfej08lCw7g1JzJqXWcx0lLM8djM9eHDr9erJ9qFnVZ5zZ9F/B9GTFZYdbNJFdekXWiOYiPPVipfP8XntFno/ze45KhO+bIQ3OfgLqw7bBHhIP9IR9Y2s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=bsUg21HO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="bsUg21HO" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2BFCC4CEE3; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 23:19:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1752621553; bh=K820+iBNMoJZqAsuKkgRQGrNMefBkmNasJMHvGIYUSM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=bsUg21HO0ipbwsHClRFaSe7FkUUAlpRr6ie30rbiUIbGwWTXq618tuOSpQlYLrXC4 AhPeCSd45wRX+6qvyGW6rM4/6HINkJWTxuR1cyjFGJBKrVsQPDOtc7v/TFHg/DHAGv YJsuSul5gQVenP6NpqhEss7mqFSrzyT4c6i2KEtpr71mD0KfY6E3ArpzMLzvz4a0Y1 lF5zhJbTVfl7OEmTB7Y/4Zo1zEREsifd3ob3cy8l8KHn8GSqGvpiD0bUTEoXrxeTI8 gKjvSLNPT6yaQENQ/hzB4YXq1fMDkCB0uJhfnWHya2xNjSplVw9rnE1P+/15D4wFaa NynEORywD96Mg== Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 16:19:11 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jason Xing Cc: Stanislav Fomichev , davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, bjorn@kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com, maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, joe@dama.to, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Xing Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xsk: skip validating skb list in xmit path Message-ID: <20250715161911.32272364@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250713025756.24601-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 07:53:19 +0800 Jason Xing wrote: > > Although, again, if you care about performance, why not use zerocopy > > mode? > > I attached the performance impact because I'm working on the different > modes in xsk to see how it really behaves. You can take it as a kind > of investigation :) How does the copy mode compare to a normal packet socket?