From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, arm64: JIT support for private stack
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 17:32:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250722173254.3879-1-puranjay@kernel.org> (raw)
The private stack is allocated in bpf_int_jit_compile() with 16-byte
alignment. It includes additional guard regions to detect stack
overflows and underflows at runtime.
Memory layout:
+------------------------------------------------------+
| |
| 16 bytes padding (overflow guard - stack top) |
| [ detects writes beyond top of stack ] |
BPF FP ->+------------------------------------------------------+
| |
| BPF private stack (sized by verifier) |
| [ 16-byte aligned ] |
| |
BPF PRIV SP ->+------------------------------------------------------+
| |
| 16 bytes padding (underflow guard - stack bottom) |
| [ detects accesses before start of stack ] |
| |
+------------------------------------------------------+
On detection of an overflow or underflow, the kernel emits messages
like:
BPF private stack overflow/underflow detected for prog <prog_name>
After commit bd737fcb6485 ("bpf, arm64: Get rid of fpb"), Jited BPF
programs use the stack in two ways:
1. Via the BPF frame pointer (top of stack), using negative offsets.
2. Via the stack pointer (bottom of stack), using positive offsets in
LDR/STR instructions.
When a private stack is used, ARM64 callee-saved register x27 replaces
the stack pointer. The BPF frame pointer usage remains unchanged; but it
now points to the top of the private stack.
Relevant tests:
#415/1 struct_ops_private_stack/private_stack:OK
#415/2 struct_ops_private_stack/private_stack_fail:OK
#415/3 struct_ops_private_stack/private_stack_recur:OK
#415 struct_ops_private_stack:OK
#549/1 verifier_private_stack/Private stack, single prog:OK
#549/2 verifier_private_stack/Private stack, subtree > MAX_BPF_STACK:OK
#549/3 verifier_private_stack/No private stack:OK
#549/4 verifier_private_stack/Private stack, callback:OK
#549/5 verifier_private_stack/Private stack, exception in main prog:OK
#549/6 verifier_private_stack/Private stack, exception in subprog:OK
#549/7 verifier_private_stack/Private stack, async callback, not nested:OK
#549/8 verifier_private_stack/Private stack, async callback, potential nesting:OK
#549 verifier_private_stack:OK
Summary: 2/11 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
---
Note: This needs the fix in [1] to work properly.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250722133410.54161-2-puranjay@kernel.org/
---
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++--
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 9 +-
include/linux/filter.h | 2 +
kernel/bpf/core.c | 7 +
.../bpf/progs/struct_ops_private_stack.c | 2 +-
.../bpf/progs/struct_ops_private_stack_fail.c | 2 +-
.../progs/struct_ops_private_stack_recur.c | 2 +-
.../bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c | 89 +++++++++++-
8 files changed, 221 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 89b1b8c248c62..5a0170536c8d4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
#define TMP_REG_2 (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 1)
#define TCCNT_PTR (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 2)
#define TMP_REG_3 (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 3)
+#define PRIVATE_SP (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 4)
#define ARENA_VM_START (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 5)
#define check_imm(bits, imm) do { \
@@ -68,6 +69,8 @@ static const int bpf2a64[] = {
[TCCNT_PTR] = A64_R(26),
/* temporary register for blinding constants */
[BPF_REG_AX] = A64_R(9),
+ /* callee saved register for private stack pointer */
+ [PRIVATE_SP] = A64_R(27),
/* callee saved register for kern_vm_start address */
[ARENA_VM_START] = A64_R(28),
};
@@ -86,6 +89,7 @@ struct jit_ctx {
u64 user_vm_start;
u64 arena_vm_start;
bool fp_used;
+ bool priv_sp_used;
bool write;
};
@@ -98,6 +102,10 @@ struct bpf_plt {
#define PLT_TARGET_SIZE sizeof_field(struct bpf_plt, target)
#define PLT_TARGET_OFFSET offsetof(struct bpf_plt, target)
+/* Memory size/value to protect private stack overflow/underflow */
+#define PRIV_STACK_GUARD_SZ 16
+#define PRIV_STACK_GUARD_VAL 0xEB9F12345678eb9fULL
+
static inline void emit(const u32 insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
{
if (ctx->image != NULL && ctx->write)
@@ -387,8 +395,11 @@ static void find_used_callee_regs(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
if (reg_used & 8)
ctx->used_callee_reg[i++] = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_9];
- if (reg_used & 16)
+ if (reg_used & 16) {
ctx->used_callee_reg[i++] = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_FP];
+ if (ctx->priv_sp_used)
+ ctx->used_callee_reg[i++] = bpf2a64[PRIVATE_SP];
+ }
if (ctx->arena_vm_start)
ctx->used_callee_reg[i++] = bpf2a64[ARENA_VM_START];
@@ -461,6 +472,19 @@ static void pop_callee_regs(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
}
}
+static void emit_percpu_ptr(const u8 dst_reg, void __percpu *ptr,
+ struct jit_ctx *ctx)
+{
+ const u8 tmp = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_1];
+
+ emit_a64_mov_i64(dst_reg, (__force const u64)ptr, ctx);
+ if (cpus_have_cap(ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN))
+ emit(A64_MRS_TPIDR_EL2(tmp), ctx);
+ else
+ emit(A64_MRS_TPIDR_EL1(tmp), ctx);
+ emit(A64_ADD(1, dst_reg, dst_reg, tmp), ctx);
+}
+
#define BTI_INSNS (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL) ? 1 : 0)
#define PAC_INSNS (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL) ? 1 : 0)
@@ -476,6 +500,8 @@ static int build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool ebpf_from_cbpf)
const bool is_main_prog = !bpf_is_subprog(prog);
const u8 fp = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_FP];
const u8 arena_vm_base = bpf2a64[ARENA_VM_START];
+ const u8 priv_sp = bpf2a64[PRIVATE_SP];
+ void __percpu *priv_stack_ptr;
const int idx0 = ctx->idx;
int cur_offset;
@@ -551,15 +577,23 @@ static int build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool ebpf_from_cbpf)
emit(A64_SUB_I(1, A64_SP, A64_FP, 96), ctx);
}
- if (ctx->fp_used)
- /* Set up BPF prog stack base register */
- emit(A64_MOV(1, fp, A64_SP), ctx);
-
/* Stack must be multiples of 16B */
ctx->stack_size = round_up(prog->aux->stack_depth, 16);
+ if (ctx->fp_used) {
+ if (ctx->priv_sp_used) {
+ /* Set up private stack pointer */
+ priv_stack_ptr = prog->aux->priv_stack_ptr + PRIV_STACK_GUARD_SZ;
+ emit_percpu_ptr(priv_sp, priv_stack_ptr, ctx);
+ emit(A64_ADD_I(1, fp, priv_sp, ctx->stack_size), ctx);
+ } else {
+ /* Set up BPF prog stack base register */
+ emit(A64_MOV(1, fp, A64_SP), ctx);
+ }
+ }
+
/* Set up function call stack */
- if (ctx->stack_size)
+ if (ctx->stack_size && !ctx->priv_sp_used)
emit(A64_SUB_I(1, A64_SP, A64_SP, ctx->stack_size), ctx);
if (ctx->arena_vm_start)
@@ -623,7 +657,7 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
emit(A64_STR64I(tcc, ptr, 0), ctx);
/* restore SP */
- if (ctx->stack_size)
+ if (ctx->stack_size && !ctx->priv_sp_used)
emit(A64_ADD_I(1, A64_SP, A64_SP, ctx->stack_size), ctx);
pop_callee_regs(ctx);
@@ -991,7 +1025,7 @@ static void build_epilogue(struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool was_classic)
const u8 ptr = bpf2a64[TCCNT_PTR];
/* We're done with BPF stack */
- if (ctx->stack_size)
+ if (ctx->stack_size && !ctx->priv_sp_used)
emit(A64_ADD_I(1, A64_SP, A64_SP, ctx->stack_size), ctx);
pop_callee_regs(ctx);
@@ -1120,6 +1154,7 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx,
const u8 tmp2 = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_2];
const u8 fp = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_FP];
const u8 arena_vm_base = bpf2a64[ARENA_VM_START];
+ const u8 priv_sp = bpf2a64[PRIVATE_SP];
const s16 off = insn->off;
const s32 imm = insn->imm;
const int i = insn - ctx->prog->insnsi;
@@ -1564,7 +1599,7 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx,
src = tmp2;
}
if (src == fp) {
- src_adj = A64_SP;
+ src_adj = ctx->priv_sp_used ? priv_sp : A64_SP;
off_adj = off + ctx->stack_size;
} else {
src_adj = src;
@@ -1654,7 +1689,7 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx,
dst = tmp2;
}
if (dst == fp) {
- dst_adj = A64_SP;
+ dst_adj = ctx->priv_sp_used ? priv_sp : A64_SP;
off_adj = off + ctx->stack_size;
} else {
dst_adj = dst;
@@ -1716,7 +1751,7 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx,
dst = tmp2;
}
if (dst == fp) {
- dst_adj = A64_SP;
+ dst_adj = ctx->priv_sp_used ? priv_sp : A64_SP;
off_adj = off + ctx->stack_size;
} else {
dst_adj = dst;
@@ -1859,6 +1894,39 @@ static inline void bpf_flush_icache(void *start, void *end)
flush_icache_range((unsigned long)start, (unsigned long)end);
}
+static void priv_stack_init_guard(void __percpu *priv_stack_ptr, int alloc_size)
+{
+ int cpu, underflow_idx = (alloc_size - PRIV_STACK_GUARD_SZ) >> 3;
+ u64 *stack_ptr;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ stack_ptr = per_cpu_ptr(priv_stack_ptr, cpu);
+ stack_ptr[0] = PRIV_STACK_GUARD_VAL;
+ stack_ptr[1] = PRIV_STACK_GUARD_VAL;
+ stack_ptr[underflow_idx] = PRIV_STACK_GUARD_VAL;
+ stack_ptr[underflow_idx + 1] = PRIV_STACK_GUARD_VAL;
+ }
+}
+
+static void priv_stack_check_guard(void __percpu *priv_stack_ptr, int alloc_size,
+ struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+ int cpu, underflow_idx = (alloc_size - PRIV_STACK_GUARD_SZ) >> 3;
+ u64 *stack_ptr;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ stack_ptr = per_cpu_ptr(priv_stack_ptr, cpu);
+ if (stack_ptr[0] != PRIV_STACK_GUARD_VAL ||
+ stack_ptr[1] != PRIV_STACK_GUARD_VAL ||
+ stack_ptr[underflow_idx] != PRIV_STACK_GUARD_VAL ||
+ stack_ptr[underflow_idx + 1] != PRIV_STACK_GUARD_VAL) {
+ pr_err("BPF private stack overflow/underflow detected for prog %sx\n",
+ bpf_jit_get_prog_name(prog));
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
struct arm64_jit_data {
struct bpf_binary_header *header;
u8 *ro_image;
@@ -1873,7 +1941,9 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
struct bpf_binary_header *header;
struct bpf_binary_header *ro_header;
struct arm64_jit_data *jit_data;
+ void __percpu *priv_stack_ptr = NULL;
bool was_classic = bpf_prog_was_classic(prog);
+ int priv_stack_alloc_sz;
bool tmp_blinded = false;
bool extra_pass = false;
struct jit_ctx ctx;
@@ -1905,6 +1975,23 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
}
prog->aux->jit_data = jit_data;
}
+ priv_stack_ptr = prog->aux->priv_stack_ptr;
+ if (!priv_stack_ptr && prog->aux->jits_use_priv_stack) {
+ /* Allocate actual private stack size with verifier-calculated
+ * stack size plus two memory guards to protect overflow and
+ * underflow.
+ */
+ priv_stack_alloc_sz = round_up(prog->aux->stack_depth, 16) +
+ 2 * PRIV_STACK_GUARD_SZ;
+ priv_stack_ptr = __alloc_percpu_gfp(priv_stack_alloc_sz, 16, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!priv_stack_ptr) {
+ prog = orig_prog;
+ goto out_priv_stack;
+ }
+
+ priv_stack_init_guard(priv_stack_ptr, priv_stack_alloc_sz);
+ prog->aux->priv_stack_ptr = priv_stack_ptr;
+ }
if (jit_data->ctx.offset) {
ctx = jit_data->ctx;
ro_image_ptr = jit_data->ro_image;
@@ -1928,6 +2015,9 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
ctx.user_vm_start = bpf_arena_get_user_vm_start(prog->aux->arena);
ctx.arena_vm_start = bpf_arena_get_kern_vm_start(prog->aux->arena);
+ if (priv_stack_ptr)
+ ctx.priv_sp_used = true;
+
/* Pass 1: Estimate the maximum image size.
*
* BPF line info needs ctx->offset[i] to be the offset of
@@ -2067,7 +2157,12 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
ctx.offset[i] *= AARCH64_INSN_SIZE;
bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo(prog, ctx.offset + 1);
out_off:
+ if (!ro_header && priv_stack_ptr) {
+ free_percpu(priv_stack_ptr);
+ prog->aux->priv_stack_ptr = NULL;
+ }
kvfree(ctx.offset);
+out_priv_stack:
kfree(jit_data);
prog->aux->jit_data = NULL;
}
@@ -2086,6 +2181,11 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
goto out_off;
}
+bool bpf_jit_supports_private_stack(void)
+{
+ return true;
+}
+
bool bpf_jit_supports_kfunc_call(void)
{
return true;
@@ -2931,6 +3031,8 @@ void bpf_jit_free(struct bpf_prog *prog)
if (prog->jited) {
struct arm64_jit_data *jit_data = prog->aux->jit_data;
struct bpf_binary_header *hdr;
+ void __percpu *priv_stack_ptr;
+ int priv_stack_alloc_sz;
/*
* If we fail the final pass of JIT (from jit_subprogs),
@@ -2944,6 +3046,13 @@ void bpf_jit_free(struct bpf_prog *prog)
}
hdr = bpf_jit_binary_pack_hdr(prog);
bpf_jit_binary_pack_free(hdr, NULL);
+ priv_stack_ptr = prog->aux->priv_stack_ptr;
+ if (priv_stack_ptr) {
+ priv_stack_alloc_sz = round_up(prog->aux->stack_depth, 16) +
+ 2 * PRIV_STACK_GUARD_SZ;
+ priv_stack_check_guard(priv_stack_ptr, priv_stack_alloc_sz, prog);
+ free_percpu(prog->aux->priv_stack_ptr);
+ }
WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_prog_kallsyms_verify_off(prog));
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 40e1b3b9634fe..7e3fca1646203 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -3501,13 +3501,6 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_dispatcher(void *image, void *buf, s64 *funcs, int num_func
return emit_bpf_dispatcher(&prog, 0, num_funcs - 1, funcs, image, buf);
}
-static const char *bpf_get_prog_name(struct bpf_prog *prog)
-{
- if (prog->aux->ksym.prog)
- return prog->aux->ksym.name;
- return prog->aux->name;
-}
-
static void priv_stack_init_guard(void __percpu *priv_stack_ptr, int alloc_size)
{
int cpu, underflow_idx = (alloc_size - PRIV_STACK_GUARD_SZ) >> 3;
@@ -3531,7 +3524,7 @@ static void priv_stack_check_guard(void __percpu *priv_stack_ptr, int alloc_size
if (stack_ptr[0] != PRIV_STACK_GUARD_VAL ||
stack_ptr[underflow_idx] != PRIV_STACK_GUARD_VAL) {
pr_err("BPF private stack overflow/underflow detected for prog %sx\n",
- bpf_get_prog_name(prog));
+ bpf_jit_get_prog_name(prog));
break;
}
}
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index eca229752cbef..5cc7a82ec8322 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -1278,6 +1278,8 @@ int bpf_jit_get_func_addr(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
const struct bpf_insn *insn, bool extra_pass,
u64 *func_addr, bool *func_addr_fixed);
+const char *bpf_jit_get_prog_name(struct bpf_prog *prog);
+
struct bpf_prog *bpf_jit_blind_constants(struct bpf_prog *fp);
void bpf_jit_prog_release_other(struct bpf_prog *fp, struct bpf_prog *fp_other);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 61613785bdd0f..29c0225c14aa9 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -1297,6 +1297,13 @@ int bpf_jit_get_func_addr(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
return 0;
}
+const char *bpf_jit_get_prog_name(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+ if (prog->aux->ksym.prog)
+ return prog->aux->ksym.name;
+ return prog->aux->name;
+}
+
static int bpf_jit_blind_insn(const struct bpf_insn *from,
const struct bpf_insn *aux,
struct bpf_insn *to_buff,
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_private_stack.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_private_stack.c
index 0e4d2ff63ab81..dbe646013811a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_private_stack.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_private_stack.c
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-#if defined(__TARGET_ARCH_x86)
+#if defined(__TARGET_ARCH_x86) || defined(__TARGET_ARCH_arm64)
bool skip __attribute((__section__(".data"))) = false;
#else
bool skip = true;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_private_stack_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_private_stack_fail.c
index 58d5d8dc22352..3d89ad7cbe2a9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_private_stack_fail.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_private_stack_fail.c
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-#if defined(__TARGET_ARCH_x86)
+#if defined(__TARGET_ARCH_x86) || defined(__TARGET_ARCH_arm64)
bool skip __attribute((__section__(".data"))) = false;
#else
bool skip = true;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_private_stack_recur.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_private_stack_recur.c
index 31e58389bb8b0..b1f6d7e5a8e50 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_private_stack_recur.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_private_stack_recur.c
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-#if defined(__TARGET_ARCH_x86)
+#if defined(__TARGET_ARCH_x86) || defined(__TARGET_ARCH_arm64)
bool skip __attribute((__section__(".data"))) = false;
#else
bool skip = true;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c
index fc91b414364e0..1ecd34ebde196 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
/* From include/linux/filter.h */
#define MAX_BPF_STACK 512
-#if defined(__TARGET_ARCH_x86)
+#if defined(__TARGET_ARCH_x86) || defined(__TARGET_ARCH_arm64)
struct elem {
struct bpf_timer t;
@@ -30,6 +30,18 @@ __jited(" movabsq $0x{{.*}}, %r9")
__jited(" addq %gs:{{.*}}, %r9")
__jited(" movl $0x2a, %edi")
__jited(" movq %rdi, -0x100(%r9)")
+__arch_arm64
+__jited(" stp x25, x27, [sp, {{.*}}]!")
+__jited(" mov x27, {{.*}}")
+__jited(" movk x27, {{.*}}, lsl #16")
+__jited(" movk x27, {{.*}}")
+__jited(" mrs x10, TPIDR_EL{{[0-1]}}")
+__jited(" add x27, x27, x10")
+__jited(" add x25, x27, {{.*}}")
+__jited(" mov x0, #0x2a")
+__jited(" str x0, [x27]")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" ldp x25, x27, [sp], {{.*}}")
__naked void private_stack_single_prog(void)
{
asm volatile (" \
@@ -45,6 +57,9 @@ __description("No private stack")
__success
__arch_x86_64
__jited(" subq $0x8, %rsp")
+__arch_arm64
+__jited(" mov x25, sp")
+__jited(" sub sp, sp, #0x10")
__naked void no_private_stack_nested(void)
{
asm volatile (" \
@@ -81,6 +96,19 @@ __jited(" pushq %r9")
__jited(" callq 0x{{.*}}")
__jited(" popq %r9")
__jited(" xorl %eax, %eax")
+__arch_arm64
+__jited(" stp x25, x27, [sp, {{.*}}]!")
+__jited(" mov x27, {{.*}}")
+__jited(" movk x27, {{.*}}, lsl #16")
+__jited(" movk x27, {{.*}}")
+__jited(" mrs x10, TPIDR_EL{{[0-1]}}")
+__jited(" add x27, x27, x10")
+__jited(" add x25, x27, {{.*}}")
+__jited(" mov x0, #0x2a")
+__jited(" str x0, [x27]")
+__jited(" bl {{.*}}")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" ldp x25, x27, [sp], {{.*}}")
__naked void private_stack_nested_1(void)
{
asm volatile (" \
@@ -131,6 +159,24 @@ __jited(" movq %rdi, -0x200(%r9)")
__jited(" pushq %r9")
__jited(" callq")
__jited(" popq %r9")
+__arch_arm64
+__jited("func #1")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" stp x25, x27, [sp, {{.*}}]!")
+__jited(" mov x27, {{.*}}")
+__jited(" movk x27, {{.*}}, lsl #16")
+__jited(" movk x27, {{.*}}")
+__jited(" mrs x10, TPIDR_EL{{[0-1]}}")
+__jited(" add x27, x27, x10")
+__jited(" add x25, x27, {{.*}}")
+__jited(" bl 0x{{.*}}")
+__jited(" add x7, x0, #0x0")
+__jited(" mov x0, #0x2a")
+__jited(" str x0, [x27]")
+__jited(" bl 0x{{.*}}")
+__jited(" add x7, x0, #0x0")
+__jited(" mov x7, #0x0")
+__jited(" ldp x25, x27, [sp], {{.*}}")
__naked void private_stack_callback(void)
{
asm volatile (" \
@@ -154,6 +200,28 @@ __arch_x86_64
__jited(" pushq %r9")
__jited(" callq")
__jited(" popq %r9")
+__arch_arm64
+__jited(" stp x29, x30, [sp, #-0x10]!")
+__jited(" mov x29, sp")
+__jited(" stp xzr, x26, [sp, #-0x10]!")
+__jited(" mov x26, sp")
+__jited(" stp x19, x20, [sp, #-0x10]!")
+__jited(" stp x21, x22, [sp, #-0x10]!")
+__jited(" stp x23, x24, [sp, #-0x10]!")
+__jited(" stp x25, x26, [sp, #-0x10]!")
+__jited(" stp x27, x28, [sp, #-0x10]!")
+__jited(" mov x27, {{.*}}")
+__jited(" movk x27, {{.*}}, lsl #16")
+__jited(" movk x27, {{.*}}")
+__jited(" mrs x10, TPIDR_EL{{[0-1]}}")
+__jited(" add x27, x27, x10")
+__jited(" add x25, x27, {{.*}}")
+__jited(" mov x0, #0x2a")
+__jited(" str x0, [x27]")
+__jited(" mov x0, #0x0")
+__jited(" bl 0x{{.*}}")
+__jited(" add x7, x0, #0x0")
+__jited(" ldp x27, x28, [sp], #0x10")
int private_stack_exception_main_prog(void)
{
asm volatile (" \
@@ -179,6 +247,19 @@ __jited(" movq %rdi, -0x200(%r9)")
__jited(" pushq %r9")
__jited(" callq")
__jited(" popq %r9")
+__arch_arm64
+__jited(" stp x27, x28, [sp, #-0x10]!")
+__jited(" mov x27, {{.*}}")
+__jited(" movk x27, {{.*}}, lsl #16")
+__jited(" movk x27, {{.*}}")
+__jited(" mrs x10, TPIDR_EL{{[0-1]}}")
+__jited(" add x27, x27, x10")
+__jited(" add x25, x27, {{.*}}")
+__jited(" mov x0, #0x2a")
+__jited(" str x0, [x27]")
+__jited(" bl 0x{{.*}}")
+__jited(" add x7, x0, #0x0")
+__jited(" ldp x27, x28, [sp], #0x10")
int private_stack_exception_sub_prog(void)
{
asm volatile (" \
@@ -220,6 +301,10 @@ __description("Private stack, async callback, not nested")
__success __retval(0)
__arch_x86_64
__jited(" movabsq $0x{{.*}}, %r9")
+__arch_arm64
+__jited(" mrs x10, TPIDR_EL{{[0-1]}}")
+__jited(" add x27, x27, x10")
+__jited(" add x25, x27, {{.*}}")
int private_stack_async_callback_1(void)
{
struct bpf_timer *arr_timer;
@@ -241,6 +326,8 @@ __description("Private stack, async callback, potential nesting")
__success __retval(0)
__arch_x86_64
__jited(" subq $0x100, %rsp")
+__arch_arm64
+__jited(" sub sp, sp, #0x100")
int private_stack_async_callback_2(void)
{
struct bpf_timer *arr_timer;
--
2.47.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-07-22 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-22 17:32 Puranjay Mohan [this message]
2025-07-23 15:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, arm64: JIT support for private stack kernel test robot
2025-07-23 22:01 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250722173254.3879-1-puranjay@kernel.org \
--to=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox