From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, memxor@gmail.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, martin.lau@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, haoluo@google.com,
ameryhung@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 04/11] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink to failable
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 11:25:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250729182550.185356-5-ameryhung@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250729182550.185356-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>
To prepare changing both bpf_local_storage_map_bucket::lock and
bpf_local_storage::lock to rqspinlock, convert bpf_selem_unlink() to
failable. It still always succeeds and returns 0 until the change
happen. No functional change.
For bpf_local_storage_map_free(), since it cannot run recursively,
and the local_storage->lock is always acquired before b->lock,
assert that the lock acquisition always succeeds.
__must_check is added to the function declaration locally to make sure
all the callers are accounted for during the conversion.
Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h | 2 +-
kernel/bpf/bpf_cgrp_storage.c | 3 +--
kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c | 4 +---
kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 6 ++++--
kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c | 4 +---
net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c | 4 +---
6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
index dc56fa459ac9..26b7f53dad33 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ int bpf_local_storage_map_check_btf(const struct bpf_map *map,
void bpf_selem_link_storage_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage,
struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem);
-void bpf_selem_unlink(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem, bool reuse_now);
+int bpf_selem_unlink(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem, bool reuse_now);
int bpf_selem_link_map(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_cgrp_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_cgrp_storage.c
index 148da8f7ff36..68a2ad1fc3d4 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_cgrp_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_cgrp_storage.c
@@ -120,8 +120,7 @@ static int cgroup_storage_delete(struct cgroup *cgroup, struct bpf_map *map)
if (!sdata)
return -ENOENT;
- bpf_selem_unlink(SELEM(sdata), false);
- return 0;
+ return bpf_selem_unlink(SELEM(sdata), false);
}
static long bpf_cgrp_storage_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c
index 15a3eb9b02d9..e55c3e0f5bb9 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c
@@ -112,9 +112,7 @@ static int inode_storage_delete(struct inode *inode, struct bpf_map *map)
if (!sdata)
return -ENOENT;
- bpf_selem_unlink(SELEM(sdata), false);
-
- return 0;
+ return bpf_selem_unlink(SELEM(sdata), false);
}
static long bpf_fd_inode_storage_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
index 7501227c8974..dda106f76491 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
@@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ static void bpf_selem_link_map_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
hlist_add_head_rcu(&selem->map_node, &b->list);
}
-void bpf_selem_unlink(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem, bool reuse_now)
+int bpf_selem_unlink(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem, bool reuse_now)
{
struct bpf_local_storage_map *storage_smap;
struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage = NULL;
@@ -473,6 +473,8 @@ void bpf_selem_unlink(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem, bool reuse_now)
if (free_local_storage)
bpf_local_storage_free(local_storage, storage_smap, bpf_ma, reuse_now);
+
+ return 0;
}
void __bpf_local_storage_insert_cache(struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage,
@@ -937,7 +939,7 @@ void bpf_local_storage_map_free(struct bpf_map *map,
struct bpf_local_storage_elem, map_node))) {
if (busy_counter)
this_cpu_inc(*busy_counter);
- bpf_selem_unlink(selem, true);
+ WARN_ON(bpf_selem_unlink(selem, true));
if (busy_counter)
this_cpu_dec(*busy_counter);
cond_resched_rcu();
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c
index 1109475953c0..c0199baba9a7 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c
@@ -169,9 +169,7 @@ static int task_storage_delete(struct task_struct *task, struct bpf_map *map,
if (!nobusy)
return -EBUSY;
- bpf_selem_unlink(SELEM(sdata), false);
-
- return 0;
+ return bpf_selem_unlink(SELEM(sdata), false);
}
static long bpf_pid_task_storage_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
diff --git a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
index fac5cf385785..7b3d44667cee 100644
--- a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
+++ b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
@@ -40,9 +40,7 @@ static int bpf_sk_storage_del(struct sock *sk, struct bpf_map *map)
if (!sdata)
return -ENOENT;
- bpf_selem_unlink(SELEM(sdata), false);
-
- return 0;
+ return bpf_selem_unlink(SELEM(sdata), false);
}
/* Called by __sk_destruct() & bpf_sk_storage_clone() */
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-29 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-29 18:25 [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 00/11] Remove task and cgroup local Amery Hung
2025-07-29 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 01/11] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink_map to failable Amery Hung
2025-08-01 1:05 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-07-29 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 02/11] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_link_map " Amery Hung
2025-07-29 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 03/11] bpf: Open code bpf_selem_unlink_storage in bpf_selem_unlink Amery Hung
2025-08-02 0:58 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-08-05 16:25 ` Amery Hung
2025-08-05 23:10 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-07-29 18:25 ` Amery Hung [this message]
2025-07-29 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 05/11] bpf: Change local_storage->lock and b->lock to rqspinlock Amery Hung
2025-07-29 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 06/11] bpf: Remove task local storage percpu counter Amery Hung
2025-08-02 1:15 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-07-29 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 07/11] bpf: Remove cgroup " Amery Hung
2025-07-29 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 08/11] bpf: Remove unused percpu counter from bpf_local_storage_map_free Amery Hung
2025-07-29 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 09/11] selftests/bpf: Update task_local_storage/recursion test Amery Hung
2025-07-29 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 10/11] selftests/bpf: Remove test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup Amery Hung
2025-07-29 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 11/11] selftests/bpf: Choose another percpu variable in bpf for btf_dump test Amery Hung
2025-07-29 18:28 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 00/11] Remove task and cgroup local Amery Hung
2025-08-02 1:46 ` Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250729182550.185356-5-ameryhung@gmail.com \
--to=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).