bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
	andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, memxor@gmail.com,
	kpsingh@kernel.org, martin.lau@kernel.org,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, haoluo@google.com,
	ameryhung@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 08/11] bpf: Remove unused percpu counter from bpf_local_storage_map_free
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 11:25:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250729182550.185356-9-ameryhung@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250729182550.185356-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>

Percpu locks have been removed from cgroup and task local storage. Now
that all local storage no longer use percpu variables as locks preventing
recursion, there is no need to pass them to bpf_local_storage_map_free().
Remove the argument from the function.

Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h | 3 +--
 kernel/bpf/bpf_cgrp_storage.c     | 2 +-
 kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c    | 2 +-
 kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c    | 7 +------
 kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c     | 2 +-
 net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c         | 2 +-
 6 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
index 2a0aae5168fa..5888e012dfe3 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
@@ -170,8 +170,7 @@ bpf_local_storage_lookup(struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage,
 void bpf_local_storage_destroy(struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage);
 
 void bpf_local_storage_map_free(struct bpf_map *map,
-				struct bpf_local_storage_cache *cache,
-				int __percpu *busy_counter);
+				struct bpf_local_storage_cache *cache);
 
 int bpf_local_storage_map_check_btf(const struct bpf_map *map,
 				    const struct btf *btf,
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_cgrp_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_cgrp_storage.c
index 4f9cfa032870..a57abb2956d5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_cgrp_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_cgrp_storage.c
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *cgroup_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 
 static void cgroup_storage_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
 {
-	bpf_local_storage_map_free(map, &cgroup_cache, NULL);
+	bpf_local_storage_map_free(map, &cgroup_cache);
 }
 
 /* *gfp_flags* is a hidden argument provided by the verifier */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c
index e55c3e0f5bb9..46985acff0dd 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *inode_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 
 static void inode_storage_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
 {
-	bpf_local_storage_map_free(map, &inode_cache, NULL);
+	bpf_local_storage_map_free(map, &inode_cache);
 }
 
 const struct bpf_map_ops inode_storage_map_ops = {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
index 5faa1df4fc50..94d7e7f88572 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
@@ -935,8 +935,7 @@ bpf_local_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr,
 }
 
 void bpf_local_storage_map_free(struct bpf_map *map,
-				struct bpf_local_storage_cache *cache,
-				int __percpu *busy_counter)
+				struct bpf_local_storage_cache *cache)
 {
 	struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b;
 	struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem;
@@ -969,11 +968,7 @@ void bpf_local_storage_map_free(struct bpf_map *map,
 		while ((selem = hlist_entry_safe(
 				rcu_dereference_raw(hlist_first_rcu(&b->list)),
 				struct bpf_local_storage_elem, map_node))) {
-			if (busy_counter)
-				this_cpu_inc(*busy_counter);
 			WARN_ON(bpf_selem_unlink(selem, true));
-			if (busy_counter)
-				this_cpu_dec(*busy_counter);
 			cond_resched_rcu();
 		}
 		rcu_read_unlock();
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c
index ff1e2e4cc5b5..b9d8c029c0e5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *task_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 
 static void task_storage_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
 {
-	bpf_local_storage_map_free(map, &task_cache, NULL);
+	bpf_local_storage_map_free(map, &task_cache);
 }
 
 BTF_ID_LIST_GLOBAL_SINGLE(bpf_local_storage_map_btf_id, struct, bpf_local_storage_map)
diff --git a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
index 7b3d44667cee..7037b841cf11 100644
--- a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
+++ b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ void bpf_sk_storage_free(struct sock *sk)
 
 static void bpf_sk_storage_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
 {
-	bpf_local_storage_map_free(map, &sk_cache, NULL);
+	bpf_local_storage_map_free(map, &sk_cache);
 }
 
 static struct bpf_map *bpf_sk_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
-- 
2.47.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-29 18:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-29 18:25 [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 00/11] Remove task and cgroup local Amery Hung
2025-07-29 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 01/11] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink_map to failable Amery Hung
2025-08-01  1:05   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-07-29 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 02/11] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_link_map " Amery Hung
2025-07-29 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 03/11] bpf: Open code bpf_selem_unlink_storage in bpf_selem_unlink Amery Hung
2025-08-02  0:58   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-08-05 16:25     ` Amery Hung
2025-08-05 23:10       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-07-29 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 04/11] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink to failable Amery Hung
2025-07-29 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 05/11] bpf: Change local_storage->lock and b->lock to rqspinlock Amery Hung
2025-07-29 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 06/11] bpf: Remove task local storage percpu counter Amery Hung
2025-08-02  1:15   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-07-29 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 07/11] bpf: Remove cgroup " Amery Hung
2025-07-29 18:25 ` Amery Hung [this message]
2025-07-29 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 09/11] selftests/bpf: Update task_local_storage/recursion test Amery Hung
2025-07-29 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 10/11] selftests/bpf: Remove test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup Amery Hung
2025-07-29 18:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 11/11] selftests/bpf: Choose another percpu variable in bpf for btf_dump test Amery Hung
2025-07-29 18:28 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 00/11] Remove task and cgroup local Amery Hung
2025-08-02  1:46 ` Martin KaFai Lau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250729182550.185356-9-ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --to=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).