From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, leon.hwang@linux.dev,
kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] bpf: Reject bpf_timer for PREEMPT_RT
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 12:40:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250908044025.77519-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
While running './test_progs -t timer' to validate the test case from
"selftests/bpf: Introduce experimental bpf_in_interrupt()"[0] for
PREEMPT_RT, I encountered a kernel panic.
To address this, reject bpf_timer usage in the verifier when
PREEMPT_RT is enabled, and skip the corresponding timer selftests.
Changes:
v1 -> v2:
* Skip test case 'timer_interrupt'.
Links:
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250903140438.59517-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev/
Leon Hwang (2):
bpf: Reject bpf_timer for PREEMPT_RT
selftests/bpf: Skip timer cases when bpf_timer is not supported
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 4 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/free_timer.c | 4 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c | 8 ++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_crash.c | 4 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_lockup.c | 4 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_mim.c | 4 ++++
6 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
--
2.51.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-09-08 4:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-08 4:40 Leon Hwang [this message]
2025-09-08 4:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: Reject bpf_timer for PREEMPT_RT Leon Hwang
2025-09-08 19:20 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-08 19:29 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-08 22:42 ` Peilin Ye
2025-09-08 22:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-09 9:00 ` Peilin Ye
2025-09-09 15:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-09 22:49 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-10 2:02 ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-10 2:06 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-11 16:38 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-12 2:20 ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-08 4:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Skip timer cases when bpf_timer is not supported Leon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250908044025.77519-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox