From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
jolsa@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
eddyz87@gmail.com, dxu@dxuuu.xyz, deso@posteo.net,
leon.hwang@linux.dev, kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/9] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_array maps
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 22:36:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250908143644.30993-6-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250908143644.30993-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Introduce support for the BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag in percpu_array maps to
allow updating values for all CPUs with a single value for both
update_elem and update_batch APIs.
Introduce support for the BPF_F_CPU flag in percpu_array maps to allow:
* update value for specified CPU for both update_elem and update_batch
APIs.
* lookup value for specified CPU for both lookup_elem and lookup_batch
APIs.
The BPF_F_CPU flag is passed via:
* map_flags of lookup_elem and update_elem APIs along with embedded cpu
info.
* elem_flags of lookup_batch and update_batch APIs along with embedded
cpu info.
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 7 ++++++-
kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | 12 +++++++++---
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index ef7f7c6a864c2..67122f852f16d 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -3754,7 +3754,12 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_find_from_stack(void);
static inline bool bpf_map_supports_cpu_flags(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
{
- return false;
+ switch (map_type) {
+ case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY:
+ return true;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
}
static inline int bpf_map_check_op_flags(struct bpf_map *map, u64 flags, u64 allowed_flags)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
index d02cce3202840..93acd4c93a3a8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
@@ -301,6 +301,11 @@ int bpf_percpu_array_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 map_f
u32 index = *(u32 *)key;
void __percpu *pptr;
u32 size;
+ int err;
+
+ err = bpf_map_check_cpu_flags(map_flags, false);
+ if (unlikely(err))
+ return err;
if (unlikely(index >= array->map.max_entries))
return -ENOENT;
@@ -383,10 +388,11 @@ int bpf_percpu_array_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
u32 index = *(u32 *)key;
void __percpu *pptr;
u32 size;
+ int err;
- if (unlikely(map_flags > BPF_EXIST))
- /* unknown flags */
- return -EINVAL;
+ err = bpf_map_check_cpu_flags(map_flags, true);
+ if (unlikely(err))
+ return err;
if (unlikely(index >= array->map.max_entries))
/* all elements were pre-allocated, cannot insert a new one */
--
2.50.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-08 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-08 14:36 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/9] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-08 14:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/9] bpf: Generalize data copying " Leon Hwang
2025-09-08 17:35 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-09 2:20 ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-08 14:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/9] bpf: Introduce internal bpf_map_check_op_flags helper function Leon Hwang
2025-09-08 17:36 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-09 2:26 ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-08 14:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/9] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags Leon Hwang
2025-09-08 14:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/9] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu maps data copying Leon Hwang
2025-09-08 14:36 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2025-09-08 14:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/9] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-08 14:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 7/9] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-08 14:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 8/9] libbpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-08 14:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add cases to test BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags Leon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250908143644.30993-6-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=deso@posteo.net \
--cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox