From: Nimrod Oren <noren@nvidia.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Mohsin Bashir <mohsin.bashr@gmail.com>
Cc: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Nimrod Oren <noren@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC net-next 2/5] selftests: drv-net: Test XDP tail adjustment with bpf_dynptr
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 11:52:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250909085236.2234306-3-noren@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250909085236.2234306-1-noren@nvidia.com>
Update xdp_adjst_tail_shrnk_data to use bpf_dynptr_slice to read the
data at the end of the packet, instead of bpf_xdp_load_bytes.
This may avoid a copy by returning a direct pointer to the dynptr data.
Note: since bpf_dynptr_slice() does not support variable lengths, we use
MAX_ADJST_OFFSET as the slice size, and update both the size check and the
UDP checksum calculation accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Nimrod Oren <noren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
---
.../selftests/net/lib/xdp_native.bpf.c | 20 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/xdp_native.bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/xdp_native.bpf.c
index 346cbba9afec..ff768fbc8606 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/xdp_native.bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/xdp_native.bpf.c
@@ -272,10 +272,11 @@ static __u16 csum_fold_helper(__u32 csum)
static int xdp_adjst_tail_shrnk_data(struct xdp_md *ctx, __u16 offset,
__u32 hdr_len)
{
- char tmp_buff[MAX_ADJST_OFFSET];
- __u32 buff_pos, udp_csum = 0;
+ char tmp_buff[MAX_ADJST_OFFSET] = {0};
+ __u32 buff_len, udp_csum = 0;
struct udphdr *udph = NULL;
- __u32 buff_len;
+ struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
+ void *data = NULL;
udph = update_pkt(ctx, 0 - offset, &udp_csum);
if (!udph)
@@ -285,18 +286,19 @@ static int xdp_adjst_tail_shrnk_data(struct xdp_md *ctx, __u16 offset,
offset = (offset & 0x1ff) >= MAX_ADJST_OFFSET ? MAX_ADJST_OFFSET :
offset & 0xff;
- if (offset == 0)
- return -1;
/* Make sure we have enough data to avoid eating the header */
- if (buff_len - offset < hdr_len)
+ if (buff_len - sizeof(tmp_buff) < hdr_len)
return -1;
- buff_pos = buff_len - offset;
- if (bpf_xdp_load_bytes(ctx, buff_pos, tmp_buff, offset) < 0)
+ bpf_dynptr_from_xdp(ctx, 0, &ptr);
+ data = bpf_dynptr_slice(&ptr, buff_len - sizeof(tmp_buff), tmp_buff,
+ sizeof(tmp_buff));
+ if (!data)
return -1;
- udp_csum = bpf_csum_diff((__be32 *)tmp_buff, offset, 0, 0, udp_csum);
+ udp_csum = bpf_csum_diff(data, sizeof(tmp_buff), data,
+ sizeof(tmp_buff) - offset, udp_csum);
udph->check = (__u16)csum_fold_helper(udp_csum);
if (bpf_xdp_adjust_tail(ctx, 0 - offset) < 0)
--
2.45.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-09 8:52 [PATCH RFC net-next 0/5] selftests: drv-net: Convert XDP program to bpf_dynptr Nimrod Oren
2025-09-09 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 1/5] selftests: drv-net: Test XDP_TX with bpf_dynptr Nimrod Oren
2025-09-09 8:52 ` Nimrod Oren [this message]
2025-09-09 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 3/5] selftests: drv-net: Test XDP head adjustment " Nimrod Oren
2025-09-09 17:26 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-09-09 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 4/5] selftests: drv-net: Adjust XDP header data " Nimrod Oren
2025-09-09 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 5/5] selftests: drv-net: Check " Nimrod Oren
2025-09-09 21:12 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 0/5] selftests: drv-net: Convert XDP program to bpf_dynptr Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250909085236.2234306-3-noren@nvidia.com \
--to=noren@nvidia.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cjubran@nvidia.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mohsin.bashr@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox