From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
yepeilin@google.com, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, leon.hwang@linux.dev,
kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Skip timer cases when bpf_timer is not supported
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 20:57:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250910125740.52172-3-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250910125740.52172-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
When enable CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT, verifier will reject bpf_timer with
returning -EOPNOTSUPP.
Therefore, skip test cases when errno is EOPNOTSUPP.
cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf
./test_progs -t timer
125 free_timer:SKIP
456 timer:SKIP
457/1 timer_crash/array:SKIP
457/2 timer_crash/hash:SKIP
457 timer_crash:SKIP
458 timer_lockup:SKIP
459 timer_mim:SKIP
Summary: 5/0 PASSED, 6 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/free_timer.c | 4 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c | 4 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_crash.c | 4 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_lockup.c | 4 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_mim.c | 4 ++++
5 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/free_timer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/free_timer.c
index b7b77a6b29799..0de8facca4c5b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/free_timer.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/free_timer.c
@@ -124,6 +124,10 @@ void test_free_timer(void)
int err;
skel = free_timer__open_and_load();
+ if (!skel && errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open_load"))
return;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c
index d66687f1ee6a8..56f660ca567ba 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c
@@ -86,6 +86,10 @@ void serial_test_timer(void)
int err;
timer_skel = timer__open_and_load();
+ if (!timer_skel && errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(timer_skel, "timer_skel_load"))
return;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_crash.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_crash.c
index f74b82305da8c..b841597c8a3a3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_crash.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_crash.c
@@ -12,6 +12,10 @@ static void test_timer_crash_mode(int mode)
struct timer_crash *skel;
skel = timer_crash__open_and_load();
+ if (!skel && errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "timer_crash__open_and_load"))
return;
skel->bss->pid = getpid();
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_lockup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_lockup.c
index 1a2f99596916f..eb303fa1e09af 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_lockup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_lockup.c
@@ -59,6 +59,10 @@ void test_timer_lockup(void)
}
skel = timer_lockup__open_and_load();
+ if (!skel && errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "timer_lockup__open_and_load"))
return;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_mim.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_mim.c
index 9ff7843909e7d..c930c7d7105b9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_mim.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_mim.c
@@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ void serial_test_timer_mim(void)
goto cleanup;
timer_skel = timer_mim__open_and_load();
+ if (!timer_skel && errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(timer_skel, "timer_skel_load"))
goto cleanup;
--
2.50.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-10 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-10 12:57 [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Reject bpf_timer for PREEMPT_RT Leon Hwang
2025-09-10 12:57 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] " Leon Hwang
2025-09-10 12:57 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2025-09-10 19:40 ` [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250910125740.52172-3-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yepeilin@google.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox