From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, ameryhung@gmail.com,
menglong8.dong@gmail.com, leon.hwang@linux.dev,
kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add union argument tests using fexit programs
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 11:42:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250918034243.205940-3-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250918034243.205940-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
By referencing
commit 1642a3945e223 ("selftests/bpf: Add struct argument tests with fentry/fexit programs."),
test the following cases for union argument support:
* 8B union argument.
* 16B union argument.
cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf
./test_progs -t tracing_struct/union_args
472/3 tracing_struct/union_args:OK
472 tracing_struct:OK
Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 93 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
index 19e68d4b3532..6f8c0bfb0415 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
@@ -112,10 +112,39 @@ static void test_struct_many_args(void)
tracing_struct_many_args__destroy(skel);
}
+static void test_union_args(void)
+{
+ struct tracing_struct *skel;
+ int err;
+
+ skel = tracing_struct__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "tracing_struct__open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ err = tracing_struct__attach(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "tracing_struct__attach"))
+ goto out;
+
+ ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(256), "trigger_read");
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->ut1_a_a, 1, "ut1:a.arg.a");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->ut1_b, 4, "ut1:b");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->ut1_c, 5, "ut1:c");
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->ut2_a, 6, "ut2:a");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->ut2_b_a, 2, "ut2:b.arg.a");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->ut2_b_b, 3, "ut2:b.arg.b");
+
+out:
+ tracing_struct__destroy(skel);
+}
+
void test_tracing_struct(void)
{
if (test__start_subtest("struct_args"))
test_struct_args();
if (test__start_subtest("struct_many_args"))
test_struct_many_args();
+ if (test__start_subtest("union_args"))
+ test_union_args();
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c
index c435a3a8328a..d460732e2023 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c
@@ -18,6 +18,18 @@ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 {
int b[];
};
+union bpf_testmod_union_arg_1 {
+ char a;
+ short b;
+ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_1 arg;
+};
+
+union bpf_testmod_union_arg_2 {
+ int a;
+ long b;
+ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 arg;
+};
+
long t1_a_a, t1_a_b, t1_b, t1_c, t1_ret, t1_nregs;
__u64 t1_reg0, t1_reg1, t1_reg2, t1_reg3;
long t2_a, t2_b_a, t2_b_b, t2_c, t2_ret;
@@ -26,6 +38,9 @@ long t4_a_a, t4_b, t4_c, t4_d, t4_e_a, t4_e_b, t4_ret;
long t5_ret;
int t6;
+long ut1_a_a, ut1_b, ut1_c;
+long ut2_a, ut2_b_a, ut2_b_b;
+
SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_1")
int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_1, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2, a, int, b, int, c)
{
@@ -130,4 +145,22 @@ int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_11, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *, a)
return 0;
}
+SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_test_union_arg_1")
+int BPF_PROG2(test_union_arg_1, union bpf_testmod_union_arg_1, a, int, b, int, c)
+{
+ ut1_a_a = a.arg.a;
+ ut1_b = b;
+ ut1_c = c;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_test_union_arg_2")
+int BPF_PROG2(test_union_arg_2, int, a, union bpf_testmod_union_arg_2, b)
+{
+ ut2_a = a;
+ ut2_b_a = b.arg.a;
+ ut2_b_b = b.arg.b;
+ return 0;
+}
+
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
index 2beb9b2fcbd8..9cd28de05960 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -62,6 +62,18 @@ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_5 {
long d;
};
+union bpf_testmod_union_arg_1 {
+ char a;
+ short b;
+ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_1 arg;
+};
+
+union bpf_testmod_union_arg_2 {
+ int a;
+ long b;
+ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 arg;
+};
+
__bpf_hook_start();
noinline int
@@ -128,6 +140,20 @@ bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_9(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, char f,
return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
}
+noinline int
+bpf_testmod_test_union_arg_1(union bpf_testmod_union_arg_1 a, int b, int c)
+{
+ bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = a.arg.a + b + c;
+ return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
+}
+
+noinline int
+bpf_testmod_test_union_arg_2(int a, union bpf_testmod_union_arg_2 b)
+{
+ bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = a + b.arg.a + b.arg.b;
+ return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
+}
+
noinline int
bpf_testmod_test_arg_ptr_to_struct(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_1 *a) {
bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = a->a;
@@ -398,6 +424,8 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *struct_arg3;
struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4 struct_arg4 = {21, 22};
struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_5 struct_arg5 = {23, 24, 25, 26};
+ union bpf_testmod_union_arg_1 union_arg1 = { .arg = {1} };
+ union bpf_testmod_union_arg_2 union_arg2 = { .arg = {2, 3} };
int i = 1;
while (bpf_testmod_return_ptr(i))
@@ -415,6 +443,9 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
(void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_9(16, (void *)17, 18, 19, (void *)20,
21, 22, struct_arg5, 27);
+ (void)bpf_testmod_test_union_arg_1(union_arg1, 4, 5);
+ (void)bpf_testmod_test_union_arg_2(6, union_arg2);
+
(void)bpf_testmod_test_arg_ptr_to_struct(&struct_arg1_2);
(void)trace_bpf_testmod_test_raw_tp_null_tp(NULL);
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-18 3:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-18 3:42 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/2] bpf: Allow union argument in trampoline based programs Leon Hwang
2025-09-18 3:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] " Leon Hwang
2025-09-18 3:42 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2025-09-23 19:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/2] " Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250918034243.205940-3-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox