* [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/7] bpf: Introduce internal bpf_map_check_op_flags helper function
2025-09-30 15:39 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps Leon Hwang
@ 2025-09-30 15:39 ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags Leon Hwang
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2025-09-30 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87, dxu,
deso, leon.hwang, kernel-patches-bot
It is to unify map flags checking for lookup_elem, update_elem,
lookup_batch and update_batch APIs.
Therefore, it will be convenient to check BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS
flags in it for these APIs in next patch.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 11 +++++++++++
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 34 +++++++++++-----------------------
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index a98c833461347..fb48db5bde472 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -3768,4 +3768,15 @@ int bpf_prog_get_file_line(struct bpf_prog *prog, unsigned long ip, const char *
const char **linep, int *nump);
struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_find_from_stack(void);
+static inline int bpf_map_check_op_flags(struct bpf_map *map, u64 flags, u64 allowed_flags)
+{
+ if (flags & ~allowed_flags)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if ((flags & BPF_F_LOCK) && !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
#endif /* _LINUX_BPF_H */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index a48fa86f82a7f..6c252d3337928 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -1709,9 +1709,6 @@ static int map_lookup_elem(union bpf_attr *attr)
if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_ELEM))
return -EINVAL;
- if (attr->flags & ~BPF_F_LOCK)
- return -EINVAL;
-
CLASS(fd, f)(attr->map_fd);
map = __bpf_map_get(f);
if (IS_ERR(map))
@@ -1719,9 +1716,9 @@ static int map_lookup_elem(union bpf_attr *attr)
if (!(map_get_sys_perms(map, f) & FMODE_CAN_READ))
return -EPERM;
- if ((attr->flags & BPF_F_LOCK) &&
- !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK))
- return -EINVAL;
+ err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->flags, BPF_F_LOCK);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
key = __bpf_copy_key(ukey, map->key_size);
if (IS_ERR(key))
@@ -1784,11 +1781,9 @@ static int map_update_elem(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
goto err_put;
}
- if ((attr->flags & BPF_F_LOCK) &&
- !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK)) {
- err = -EINVAL;
+ err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->flags, ~0);
+ if (err)
goto err_put;
- }
key = ___bpf_copy_key(ukey, map->key_size);
if (IS_ERR(key)) {
@@ -1992,13 +1987,9 @@ int generic_map_update_batch(struct bpf_map *map, struct file *map_file,
void *key, *value;
int err = 0;
- if (attr->batch.elem_flags & ~BPF_F_LOCK)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- if ((attr->batch.elem_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) &&
- !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK)) {
- return -EINVAL;
- }
+ err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->batch.elem_flags, BPF_F_LOCK);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map);
@@ -2055,12 +2046,9 @@ int generic_map_lookup_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
u32 value_size, cp, max_count;
int err;
- if (attr->batch.elem_flags & ~BPF_F_LOCK)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- if ((attr->batch.elem_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) &&
- !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK))
- return -EINVAL;
+ err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->batch.elem_flags, BPF_F_LOCK);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map);
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags
2025-09-30 15:39 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/7] bpf: Introduce internal bpf_map_check_op_flags helper function Leon Hwang
@ 2025-09-30 15:39 ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_array maps Leon Hwang
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2025-09-30 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87, dxu,
deso, leon.hwang, kernel-patches-bot
Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags and check them for
following APIs:
* 'map_lookup_elem()'
* 'map_update_elem()'
* 'generic_map_lookup_batch()'
* 'generic_map_update_batch()'
And, get the correct value size for these APIs.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 ++
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 ++
4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index fb48db5bde472..731de0efdd00e 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -3768,14 +3768,35 @@ int bpf_prog_get_file_line(struct bpf_prog *prog, unsigned long ip, const char *
const char **linep, int *nump);
struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_find_from_stack(void);
+static inline bool bpf_map_supports_cpu_flags(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
static inline int bpf_map_check_op_flags(struct bpf_map *map, u64 flags, u64 allowed_flags)
{
- if (flags & ~allowed_flags)
+ u32 cpu;
+
+ if ((u32)flags & ~allowed_flags)
return -EINVAL;
if ((flags & BPF_F_LOCK) && !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK))
return -EINVAL;
+ if (!(flags & BPF_F_CPU) && flags >> 32)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (flags & (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)) {
+ if (!bpf_map_supports_cpu_flags(map->map_type))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if ((flags & BPF_F_CPU) && (flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ cpu = flags >> 32;
+ if ((flags & BPF_F_CPU) && cpu >= num_possible_cpus())
+ return -ERANGE;
+ }
+
return 0;
}
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index ae83d8649ef1c..f827353424ec5 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1372,6 +1372,8 @@ enum {
BPF_NOEXIST = 1, /* create new element if it didn't exist */
BPF_EXIST = 2, /* update existing element */
BPF_F_LOCK = 4, /* spin_lock-ed map_lookup/map_update */
+ BPF_F_CPU = 8, /* cpu flag for percpu maps, upper 32-bit of flags is a cpu number */
+ BPF_F_ALL_CPUS = 16, /* update value across all CPUs for percpu maps */
};
/* flags for BPF_MAP_CREATE command */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 6c252d3337928..8c206d46de3f5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -133,12 +133,14 @@ bool bpf_map_write_active(const struct bpf_map *map)
return atomic64_read(&map->writecnt) != 0;
}
-static u32 bpf_map_value_size(const struct bpf_map *map)
-{
- if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH ||
- map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH ||
- map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY ||
- map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE)
+static u32 bpf_map_value_size(const struct bpf_map *map, u64 flags)
+{
+ if (flags & (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS))
+ return map->value_size;
+ else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH ||
+ map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH ||
+ map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY ||
+ map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE)
return round_up(map->value_size, 8) * num_possible_cpus();
else if (IS_FD_MAP(map))
return sizeof(u32);
@@ -1716,7 +1718,7 @@ static int map_lookup_elem(union bpf_attr *attr)
if (!(map_get_sys_perms(map, f) & FMODE_CAN_READ))
return -EPERM;
- err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->flags, BPF_F_LOCK);
+ err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->flags, BPF_F_LOCK | BPF_F_CPU);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -1724,7 +1726,7 @@ static int map_lookup_elem(union bpf_attr *attr)
if (IS_ERR(key))
return PTR_ERR(key);
- value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map);
+ value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map, attr->flags);
err = -ENOMEM;
value = kvmalloc(value_size, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
@@ -1791,7 +1793,7 @@ static int map_update_elem(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
goto err_put;
}
- value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map);
+ value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map, attr->flags);
value = kvmemdup_bpfptr(uvalue, value_size);
if (IS_ERR(value)) {
err = PTR_ERR(value);
@@ -1987,11 +1989,12 @@ int generic_map_update_batch(struct bpf_map *map, struct file *map_file,
void *key, *value;
int err = 0;
- err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->batch.elem_flags, BPF_F_LOCK);
+ err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->batch.elem_flags,
+ BPF_F_LOCK | BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS);
if (err)
return err;
- value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map);
+ value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map, attr->batch.elem_flags);
max_count = attr->batch.count;
if (!max_count)
@@ -2046,11 +2049,11 @@ int generic_map_lookup_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
u32 value_size, cp, max_count;
int err;
- err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->batch.elem_flags, BPF_F_LOCK);
+ err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->batch.elem_flags, BPF_F_LOCK | BPF_F_CPU);
if (err)
return err;
- value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map);
+ value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map, attr->batch.elem_flags);
max_count = attr->batch.count;
if (!max_count)
@@ -2172,7 +2175,7 @@ static int map_lookup_and_delete_elem(union bpf_attr *attr)
goto err_put;
}
- value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map);
+ value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map, 0);
err = -ENOMEM;
value = kvmalloc(value_size, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index ae83d8649ef1c..f827353424ec5 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1372,6 +1372,8 @@ enum {
BPF_NOEXIST = 1, /* create new element if it didn't exist */
BPF_EXIST = 2, /* update existing element */
BPF_F_LOCK = 4, /* spin_lock-ed map_lookup/map_update */
+ BPF_F_CPU = 8, /* cpu flag for percpu maps, upper 32-bit of flags is a cpu number */
+ BPF_F_ALL_CPUS = 16, /* update value across all CPUs for percpu maps */
};
/* flags for BPF_MAP_CREATE command */
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_array maps
2025-09-30 15:39 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/7] bpf: Introduce internal bpf_map_check_op_flags helper function Leon Hwang
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags Leon Hwang
@ 2025-09-30 15:39 ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps Leon Hwang
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2025-09-30 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87, dxu,
deso, leon.hwang, kernel-patches-bot
Introduce support for the BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag in percpu_array maps to
allow updating values for all CPUs with a single value for both
update_elem and update_batch APIs.
Introduce support for the BPF_F_CPU flag in percpu_array maps to allow:
* update value for specified CPU for both update_elem and update_batch
APIs.
* lookup value for specified CPU for both lookup_elem and lookup_batch
APIs.
The BPF_F_CPU flag is passed via:
* map_flags of lookup_elem and update_elem APIs along with embedded cpu
info.
* elem_flags of lookup_batch and update_batch APIs along with embedded
cpu info.
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 9 +++++++--
kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 731de0efdd00e..31498b445b447 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2718,7 +2718,7 @@ int map_set_for_each_callback_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
struct bpf_func_state *callee);
int bpf_percpu_hash_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value);
-int bpf_percpu_array_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value);
+int bpf_percpu_array_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 flags);
int bpf_percpu_hash_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
u64 flags);
int bpf_percpu_array_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
@@ -3770,7 +3770,12 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_find_from_stack(void);
static inline bool bpf_map_supports_cpu_flags(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
{
- return false;
+ switch (map_type) {
+ case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY:
+ return true;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
}
static inline int bpf_map_check_op_flags(struct bpf_map *map, u64 flags, u64 allowed_flags)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
index 80b1765a31596..78e590ffd2a62 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ static void *percpu_array_map_lookup_percpu_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
return per_cpu_ptr(array->pptrs[index & array->index_mask], cpu);
}
-int bpf_percpu_array_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value)
+int bpf_percpu_array_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 map_flags)
{
struct bpf_array *array = container_of(map, struct bpf_array, map);
u32 index = *(u32 *)key;
@@ -325,11 +325,18 @@ int bpf_percpu_array_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value)
size = array->elem_size;
rcu_read_lock();
pptr = array->pptrs[index & array->index_mask];
+ if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
+ cpu = map_flags >> 32;
+ copy_map_value(map, value, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
+ check_and_init_map_value(map, value);
+ goto unlock;
+ }
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
copy_map_value_long(map, value + off, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
check_and_init_map_value(map, value + off);
off += size;
}
+unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
}
@@ -399,10 +406,11 @@ int bpf_percpu_array_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
struct bpf_array *array = container_of(map, struct bpf_array, map);
u32 index = *(u32 *)key;
void __percpu *pptr;
- int cpu, off = 0;
+ void *ptr;
u32 size;
+ int cpu;
- if (unlikely(map_flags > BPF_EXIST))
+ if (unlikely((map_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) || (u32)map_flags > BPF_F_ALL_CPUS))
/* unknown flags */
return -EINVAL;
@@ -423,11 +431,18 @@ int bpf_percpu_array_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
size = array->elem_size;
rcu_read_lock();
pptr = array->pptrs[index & array->index_mask];
+ if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
+ cpu = map_flags >> 32;
+ copy_map_value(map, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), value);
+ bpf_obj_free_fields(array->map.record, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
+ goto unlock;
+ }
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- copy_map_value_long(map, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), value + off);
+ ptr = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + size * cpu;
+ copy_map_value(map, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), ptr);
bpf_obj_free_fields(array->map.record, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
- off += size;
}
+unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
}
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 8c206d46de3f5..f8de1433fdffb 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int bpf_map_copy_value(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH) {
err = bpf_percpu_hash_copy(map, key, value);
} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY) {
- err = bpf_percpu_array_copy(map, key, value);
+ err = bpf_percpu_array_copy(map, key, value, flags);
} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE) {
err = bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(map, key, value);
} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK_TRACE) {
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps
2025-09-30 15:39 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps Leon Hwang
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_array maps Leon Hwang
@ 2025-09-30 15:39 ` Leon Hwang
2025-10-06 22:29 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps Leon Hwang
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2025-09-30 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87, dxu,
deso, leon.hwang, kernel-patches-bot
Introduce BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash
maps to allow updating values for all CPUs with a single value for both
update_elem and update_batch APIs.
Introduce BPF_F_CPU flag support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash
maps to allow:
* update value for specified CPU for both update_elem and update_batch
APIs.
* lookup value for specified CPU for both lookup_elem and lookup_batch
APIs.
The BPF_F_CPU flag is passed via:
* map_flags along with embedded cpu info.
* elem_flags along with embedded cpu info.
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 4 ++-
kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 31498b445b447..b3d9a584f34e2 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2717,7 +2717,7 @@ int map_set_for_each_callback_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
struct bpf_func_state *caller,
struct bpf_func_state *callee);
-int bpf_percpu_hash_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value);
+int bpf_percpu_hash_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 flags);
int bpf_percpu_array_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 flags);
int bpf_percpu_hash_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
u64 flags);
@@ -3772,6 +3772,8 @@ static inline bool bpf_map_supports_cpu_flags(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
{
switch (map_type) {
case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY:
+ case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH:
+ case BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH:
return true;
default:
return false;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
index c2fcd0cd51e51..6fb28ba2406c4 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
@@ -945,24 +945,32 @@ static void free_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, struct htab_elem *l)
}
static void pcpu_copy_value(struct bpf_htab *htab, void __percpu *pptr,
- void *value, bool onallcpus)
+ void *value, bool onallcpus, u64 map_flags)
{
if (!onallcpus) {
/* copy true value_size bytes */
copy_map_value(&htab->map, this_cpu_ptr(pptr), value);
} else {
- u32 size = round_up(htab->map.value_size, 8);
- int off = 0, cpu;
+ u32 size = (map_flags & (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)) ?
+ htab->map.value_size : round_up(htab->map.value_size, 8);
+ void *ptr;
+ int cpu;
+
+ if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
+ cpu = map_flags >> 32;
+ memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), value, size);
+ return;
+ }
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- copy_map_value_long(&htab->map, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), value + off);
- off += size;
+ ptr = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + size * cpu;
+ memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), ptr, size);
}
}
}
static void pcpu_init_value(struct bpf_htab *htab, void __percpu *pptr,
- void *value, bool onallcpus)
+ void *value, bool onallcpus, u64 map_flags)
{
/* When not setting the initial value on all cpus, zero-fill element
* values for other cpus. Otherwise, bpf program has no way to ensure
@@ -980,7 +988,7 @@ static void pcpu_init_value(struct bpf_htab *htab, void __percpu *pptr,
zero_map_value(&htab->map, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
}
} else {
- pcpu_copy_value(htab, pptr, value, onallcpus);
+ pcpu_copy_value(htab, pptr, value, onallcpus, map_flags);
}
}
@@ -992,7 +1000,7 @@ static bool fd_htab_map_needs_adjust(const struct bpf_htab *htab)
static struct htab_elem *alloc_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, void *key,
void *value, u32 key_size, u32 hash,
bool percpu, bool onallcpus,
- struct htab_elem *old_elem)
+ struct htab_elem *old_elem, u64 map_flags)
{
u32 size = htab->map.value_size;
bool prealloc = htab_is_prealloc(htab);
@@ -1050,7 +1058,7 @@ static struct htab_elem *alloc_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, void *key,
pptr = *(void __percpu **)ptr;
}
- pcpu_init_value(htab, pptr, value, onallcpus);
+ pcpu_init_value(htab, pptr, value, onallcpus, map_flags);
if (!prealloc)
htab_elem_set_ptr(l_new, key_size, pptr);
@@ -1155,7 +1163,7 @@ static long htab_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
}
l_new = alloc_htab_elem(htab, key, value, key_size, hash, false, false,
- l_old);
+ l_old, map_flags);
if (IS_ERR(l_new)) {
/* all pre-allocated elements are in use or memory exhausted */
ret = PTR_ERR(l_new);
@@ -1271,9 +1279,11 @@ static long htab_map_update_elem_in_place(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
u32 key_size, hash;
int ret;
- if (unlikely(map_flags > BPF_EXIST))
+ if (unlikely(!onallcpus && map_flags > BPF_EXIST))
/* unknown flags */
return -EINVAL;
+ if (unlikely(onallcpus && ((map_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) || (u32)map_flags > BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)))
+ return -EINVAL;
WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
!rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
@@ -1299,7 +1309,7 @@ static long htab_map_update_elem_in_place(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
/* Update value in-place */
if (percpu) {
pcpu_copy_value(htab, htab_elem_get_ptr(l_old, key_size),
- value, onallcpus);
+ value, onallcpus, map_flags);
} else {
void **inner_map_pptr = htab_elem_value(l_old, key_size);
@@ -1308,7 +1318,7 @@ static long htab_map_update_elem_in_place(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
}
} else {
l_new = alloc_htab_elem(htab, key, value, key_size,
- hash, percpu, onallcpus, NULL);
+ hash, percpu, onallcpus, NULL, map_flags);
if (IS_ERR(l_new)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(l_new);
goto err;
@@ -1334,9 +1344,11 @@ static long __htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
u32 key_size, hash;
int ret;
- if (unlikely(map_flags > BPF_EXIST))
+ if (unlikely(!onallcpus && map_flags > BPF_EXIST))
/* unknown flags */
return -EINVAL;
+ if (unlikely(onallcpus && ((map_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) || (u32)map_flags > BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)))
+ return -EINVAL;
WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
!rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
@@ -1374,10 +1386,10 @@ static long __htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
/* per-cpu hash map can update value in-place */
pcpu_copy_value(htab, htab_elem_get_ptr(l_old, key_size),
- value, onallcpus);
+ value, onallcpus, map_flags);
} else {
pcpu_init_value(htab, htab_elem_get_ptr(l_new, key_size),
- value, onallcpus);
+ value, onallcpus, map_flags);
hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(&l_new->hash_node, head);
l_new = NULL;
}
@@ -1689,9 +1701,9 @@ __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
void __user *ukeys = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->batch.keys);
void __user *ubatch = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->batch.in_batch);
u32 batch, max_count, size, bucket_size, map_id;
+ u64 elem_map_flags, map_flags, allowed_flags;
u32 bucket_cnt, total, key_size, value_size;
struct htab_elem *node_to_free = NULL;
- u64 elem_map_flags, map_flags;
struct hlist_nulls_head *head;
struct hlist_nulls_node *n;
unsigned long flags = 0;
@@ -1701,9 +1713,12 @@ __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
int ret = 0;
elem_map_flags = attr->batch.elem_flags;
- if ((elem_map_flags & ~BPF_F_LOCK) ||
- ((elem_map_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) && !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK)))
- return -EINVAL;
+ allowed_flags = BPF_F_LOCK;
+ if (!do_delete && is_percpu)
+ allowed_flags |= BPF_F_CPU;
+ ret = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, elem_map_flags, allowed_flags);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
map_flags = attr->batch.flags;
if (map_flags)
@@ -1726,7 +1741,7 @@ __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
key_size = htab->map.key_size;
value_size = htab->map.value_size;
size = round_up(value_size, 8);
- if (is_percpu)
+ if (is_percpu && !(elem_map_flags & BPF_F_CPU))
value_size = size * num_possible_cpus();
total = 0;
/* while experimenting with hash tables with sizes ranging from 10 to
@@ -1809,10 +1824,17 @@ __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
void __percpu *pptr;
pptr = htab_elem_get_ptr(l, map->key_size);
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- copy_map_value_long(&htab->map, dst_val + off, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
- check_and_init_map_value(&htab->map, dst_val + off);
- off += size;
+ if (elem_map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
+ cpu = elem_map_flags >> 32;
+ copy_map_value(&htab->map, dst_val, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
+ check_and_init_map_value(&htab->map, dst_val);
+ } else {
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ copy_map_value_long(&htab->map, dst_val + off,
+ per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
+ check_and_init_map_value(&htab->map, dst_val + off);
+ off += size;
+ }
}
} else {
value = htab_elem_value(l, key_size);
@@ -2368,7 +2390,7 @@ static void *htab_lru_percpu_map_lookup_percpu_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *k
return NULL;
}
-int bpf_percpu_hash_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value)
+int bpf_percpu_hash_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 map_flags)
{
struct htab_elem *l;
void __percpu *pptr;
@@ -2385,16 +2407,22 @@ int bpf_percpu_hash_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value)
l = __htab_map_lookup_elem(map, key);
if (!l)
goto out;
+ ret = 0;
/* We do not mark LRU map element here in order to not mess up
* eviction heuristics when user space does a map walk.
*/
pptr = htab_elem_get_ptr(l, map->key_size);
+ if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
+ cpu = map_flags >> 32;
+ copy_map_value(map, value, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
+ check_and_init_map_value(map, value);
+ goto out;
+ }
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
copy_map_value_long(map, value + off, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
check_and_init_map_value(map, value + off);
off += size;
}
- ret = 0;
out:
rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index f8de1433fdffb..ce525a474656a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static int bpf_map_copy_value(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
bpf_disable_instrumentation();
if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH ||
map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH) {
- err = bpf_percpu_hash_copy(map, key, value);
+ err = bpf_percpu_hash_copy(map, key, value, flags);
} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY) {
err = bpf_percpu_array_copy(map, key, value, flags);
} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE) {
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps Leon Hwang
@ 2025-10-06 22:29 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-08 4:48 ` Leon Hwang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2025-10-06 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leon Hwang
Cc: bpf, ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87,
dxu, deso, kernel-patches-bot
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 8:40 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> Introduce BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash
> maps to allow updating values for all CPUs with a single value for both
> update_elem and update_batch APIs.
>
> Introduce BPF_F_CPU flag support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash
> maps to allow:
>
> * update value for specified CPU for both update_elem and update_batch
> APIs.
> * lookup value for specified CPU for both lookup_elem and lookup_batch
> APIs.
>
> The BPF_F_CPU flag is passed via:
>
> * map_flags along with embedded cpu info.
> * elem_flags along with embedded cpu info.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf.h | 4 ++-
> kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index 31498b445b447..b3d9a584f34e2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -2717,7 +2717,7 @@ int map_set_for_each_callback_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> struct bpf_func_state *caller,
> struct bpf_func_state *callee);
>
> -int bpf_percpu_hash_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value);
> +int bpf_percpu_hash_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 flags);
> int bpf_percpu_array_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 flags);
> int bpf_percpu_hash_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
> u64 flags);
> @@ -3772,6 +3772,8 @@ static inline bool bpf_map_supports_cpu_flags(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
> {
> switch (map_type) {
> case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY:
> + case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH:
> + case BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH:
> return true;
> default:
> return false;
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> index c2fcd0cd51e51..6fb28ba2406c4 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> @@ -945,24 +945,32 @@ static void free_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, struct htab_elem *l)
> }
>
> static void pcpu_copy_value(struct bpf_htab *htab, void __percpu *pptr,
> - void *value, bool onallcpus)
> + void *value, bool onallcpus, u64 map_flags)
> {
> if (!onallcpus) {
> /* copy true value_size bytes */
> copy_map_value(&htab->map, this_cpu_ptr(pptr), value);
> } else {
> - u32 size = round_up(htab->map.value_size, 8);
> - int off = 0, cpu;
> + u32 size = (map_flags & (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)) ?
> + htab->map.value_size : round_up(htab->map.value_size, 8);
> + void *ptr;
> + int cpu;
> +
> + if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
> + cpu = map_flags >> 32;
> + memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), value, size);
> + return;
> + }
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - copy_map_value_long(&htab->map, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), value + off);
> - off += size;
> + ptr = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + size * cpu;
> + memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), ptr, size);
ok, so you fixed the value_size problem and at the same time
introduced blind memcpy() problem?.. Per-CPU maps are allowed to have
some special fields (see BPF_REFCOUNT and BPF_KPTR_* checks in
map_check_btf()), which have to be handled specially inside
copy_map_value[_long](), we cannot just memcpy() blindly
all the other places use copy_map_value[_long](), why did you decide
to switch to memcpy here?
pw-bot: cr
> }
> }
> }
>
[...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps
2025-10-06 22:29 ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2025-10-08 4:48 ` Leon Hwang
2025-10-13 23:17 ` Andrii Nakryiko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2025-10-08 4:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: bpf, ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87,
dxu, deso, kernel-patches-bot
On 7/10/25 06:29, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 8:40 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> Introduce BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash
>> maps to allow updating values for all CPUs with a single value for both
>> update_elem and update_batch APIs.
>>
>> Introduce BPF_F_CPU flag support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash
>> maps to allow:
>>
>> * update value for specified CPU for both update_elem and update_batch
>> APIs.
>> * lookup value for specified CPU for both lookup_elem and lookup_batch
>> APIs.
>>
>> The BPF_F_CPU flag is passed via:
>>
>> * map_flags along with embedded cpu info.
>> * elem_flags along with embedded cpu info.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
>> ---
[...]
>>
>> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> - copy_map_value_long(&htab->map, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), value + off);
>> - off += size;
>> + ptr = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + size * cpu;
>> + memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), ptr, size);
>
> ok, so you fixed the value_size problem and at the same time
> introduced blind memcpy() problem?.. Per-CPU maps are allowed to have
> some special fields (see BPF_REFCOUNT and BPF_KPTR_* checks in
> map_check_btf()), which have to be handled specially inside
> copy_map_value[_long](), we cannot just memcpy() blindly
>
> all the other places use copy_map_value[_long](), why did you decide
> to switch to memcpy here?
>
You’re right — using memcpy() here is incorrect. I should be using
copy_map_value() instead.
When comparing this path with bpf_percpu_array_update(), I noticed that
bpf_obj_free_fields() is missing here. That was why I initially switched
to memcpy().
To clarify:
1. If those special fields (like BPF_REFCOUNT or BPF_KPTR_*) are
*not* supported here, memcpy() behaves the same as
copy_map_value().
static inline void bpf_obj_memcpy(struct btf_record *rec,
void *dst, void *src, u32 size,
bool long_memcpy)
{
u32 curr_off = 0;
int i;
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rec)) {
if (long_memcpy)
bpf_long_memcpy(dst, src, round_up(size, 8));
else
memcpy(dst, src, size);
return;
}
...
}
static inline void copy_map_value(struct bpf_map *map, void *dst, void *src)
{
bpf_obj_memcpy(map->record, dst, src, map->value_size, false);
}
2. However, if those special fields *are* supported here, then missing
bpf_obj_free_fields() seems like a real issue.
In that case, I’d like to send a separate patch set to add
bpf_obj_free_fields() properly.
Does that sound reasonable?
Thanks,
Leon
[...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps
2025-10-08 4:48 ` Leon Hwang
@ 2025-10-13 23:17 ` Andrii Nakryiko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2025-10-13 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leon Hwang
Cc: bpf, ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87,
dxu, deso, kernel-patches-bot
On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 9:48 PM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/10/25 06:29, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 8:40 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
> >>
> >> Introduce BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash
> >> maps to allow updating values for all CPUs with a single value for both
> >> update_elem and update_batch APIs.
> >>
> >> Introduce BPF_F_CPU flag support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash
> >> maps to allow:
> >>
> >> * update value for specified CPU for both update_elem and update_batch
> >> APIs.
> >> * lookup value for specified CPU for both lookup_elem and lookup_batch
> >> APIs.
> >>
> >> The BPF_F_CPU flag is passed via:
> >>
> >> * map_flags along with embedded cpu info.
> >> * elem_flags along with embedded cpu info.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
> >> ---
>
> [...]
>
> >>
> >> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> >> - copy_map_value_long(&htab->map, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), value + off);
> >> - off += size;
> >> + ptr = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + size * cpu;
> >> + memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), ptr, size);
> >
> > ok, so you fixed the value_size problem and at the same time
> > introduced blind memcpy() problem?.. Per-CPU maps are allowed to have
> > some special fields (see BPF_REFCOUNT and BPF_KPTR_* checks in
> > map_check_btf()), which have to be handled specially inside
> > copy_map_value[_long](), we cannot just memcpy() blindly
> >
> > all the other places use copy_map_value[_long](), why did you decide
> > to switch to memcpy here?
> >
>
> You’re right — using memcpy() here is incorrect. I should be using
> copy_map_value() instead.
>
> When comparing this path with bpf_percpu_array_update(), I noticed that
> bpf_obj_free_fields() is missing here. That was why I initially switched
> to memcpy().
>
> To clarify:
>
> 1. If those special fields (like BPF_REFCOUNT or BPF_KPTR_*) are
> *not* supported here, memcpy() behaves the same as
> copy_map_value().
>
> static inline void bpf_obj_memcpy(struct btf_record *rec,
> void *dst, void *src, u32 size,
> bool long_memcpy)
> {
> u32 curr_off = 0;
> int i;
>
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rec)) {
> if (long_memcpy)
> bpf_long_memcpy(dst, src, round_up(size, 8));
> else
> memcpy(dst, src, size);
> return;
> }
>
> ...
> }
>
> static inline void copy_map_value(struct bpf_map *map, void *dst, void *src)
> {
> bpf_obj_memcpy(map->record, dst, src, map->value_size, false);
> }
>
> 2. However, if those special fields *are* supported here, then missing
> bpf_obj_free_fields() seems like a real issue.
> In that case, I’d like to send a separate patch set to add
> bpf_obj_free_fields() properly.
> Does that sound reasonable?
Add a test and we'll know for sure? But it looks like yes, you can use
*some* special fields for per-CPU maps.
>
> Thanks,
> Leon
>
> [...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps
2025-09-30 15:39 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps Leon Hwang
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps Leon Hwang
@ 2025-09-30 15:39 ` Leon Hwang
2025-10-06 22:33 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 6/7] libbpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add cases to test BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags Leon Hwang
6 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2025-09-30 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87, dxu,
deso, leon.hwang, kernel-patches-bot
Introduce BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps to
allow updating values for all CPUs with a single value for update_elem
API.
Introduce BPF_F_CPU flag support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps to
allow:
* update value for specified CPU for update_elem API.
* lookup value for specified CPU for lookup_elem API.
The BPF_F_CPU flag is passed via map_flags along with embedded cpu info.
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h | 4 ++--
include/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
kernel/bpf/local_storage.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
index aedf573bdb426..013f4db9903fd 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ void bpf_cgroup_storage_link(struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage,
void bpf_cgroup_storage_unlink(struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage);
int bpf_cgroup_storage_assign(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux, struct bpf_map *map);
-int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value);
+int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 flags);
int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
void *value, u64 flags);
@@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static inline struct bpf_cgroup_storage *bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(
static inline void bpf_cgroup_storage_free(
struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage) {}
static inline int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
- void *value) {
+ void *value, u64 flags) {
return 0;
}
static inline int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *map,
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index b3d9a584f34e2..6250804394b53 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -3774,6 +3774,7 @@ static inline bool bpf_map_supports_cpu_flags(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY:
case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH:
case BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH:
+ case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE:
return true;
default:
return false;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
index c93a756e035c0..f5188e0afa478 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static long cgroup_storage_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
}
int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
- void *value)
+ void *value, u64 map_flags)
{
struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map *map = map_to_storage(_map);
struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage;
@@ -198,12 +198,18 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
* access 'value_size' of them, so copying rounded areas
* will not leak any kernel data
*/
+ if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
+ cpu = map_flags >> 32;
+ memcpy(value, per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), _map->value_size);
+ goto unlock;
+ }
size = round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
bpf_long_memcpy(value + off,
per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), size);
off += size;
}
+unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
}
@@ -213,10 +219,11 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
{
struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map *map = map_to_storage(_map);
struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage;
- int cpu, off = 0;
+ void *ptr;
u32 size;
+ int cpu;
- if (map_flags != BPF_ANY && map_flags != BPF_EXIST)
+ if ((u32)map_flags & ~(BPF_ANY | BPF_EXIST | BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS))
return -EINVAL;
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -232,12 +239,18 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
* returned or zeros which were zero-filled by percpu_alloc,
* so no kernel data leaks possible
*/
- size = round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
+ size = (map_flags & (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)) ? _map->value_size :
+ round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
+ if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
+ cpu = map_flags >> 32;
+ memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), value, size);
+ goto unlock;
+ }
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- bpf_long_memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu),
- value + off, size);
- off += size;
+ ptr = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + size * cpu;
+ memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), ptr, size);
}
+unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
}
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index ce525a474656a..b654115c99e01 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static int bpf_map_copy_value(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY) {
err = bpf_percpu_array_copy(map, key, value, flags);
} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE) {
- err = bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(map, key, value);
+ err = bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(map, key, value, flags);
} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK_TRACE) {
err = bpf_stackmap_extract(map, key, value, false);
} else if (IS_FD_ARRAY(map) || IS_FD_PROG_ARRAY(map)) {
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps Leon Hwang
@ 2025-10-06 22:33 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-08 5:31 ` Leon Hwang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2025-10-06 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leon Hwang
Cc: bpf, ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87,
dxu, deso, kernel-patches-bot
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 8:40 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> Introduce BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps to
> allow updating values for all CPUs with a single value for update_elem
> API.
>
> Introduce BPF_F_CPU flag support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps to
> allow:
>
> * update value for specified CPU for update_elem API.
> * lookup value for specified CPU for lookup_elem API.
>
> The BPF_F_CPU flag is passed via map_flags along with embedded cpu info.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h | 4 ++--
> include/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> kernel/bpf/local_storage.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> index aedf573bdb426..013f4db9903fd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ void bpf_cgroup_storage_link(struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage,
> void bpf_cgroup_storage_unlink(struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage);
> int bpf_cgroup_storage_assign(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux, struct bpf_map *map);
>
> -int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value);
> +int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 flags);
> int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
> void *value, u64 flags);
>
> @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static inline struct bpf_cgroup_storage *bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(
> static inline void bpf_cgroup_storage_free(
> struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage) {}
> static inline int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
> - void *value) {
> + void *value, u64 flags) {
> return 0;
> }
> static inline int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *map,
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index b3d9a584f34e2..6250804394b53 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -3774,6 +3774,7 @@ static inline bool bpf_map_supports_cpu_flags(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
> case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY:
> case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH:
> case BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH:
> + case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE:
> return true;
> default:
> return false;
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
> index c93a756e035c0..f5188e0afa478 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static long cgroup_storage_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
> }
>
> int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
> - void *value)
> + void *value, u64 map_flags)
> {
> struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map *map = map_to_storage(_map);
> struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage;
> @@ -198,12 +198,18 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
> * access 'value_size' of them, so copying rounded areas
> * will not leak any kernel data
> */
> + if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
> + cpu = map_flags >> 32;
> + memcpy(value, per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), _map->value_size);
this is so far ok, because we don't seem to allow special fields for
PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE, but it's best to switch this one to
copy_map_value()
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> size = round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> bpf_long_memcpy(value + off,
> per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), size);
and let's switch this to copy_map_value_long() to future-proof this:
copy_map_value[_long]() should work correctly with any type of map and
will take care of all existing and future special fields
(but maybe have it as a separate patch with just that change to make it obvious)
> off += size;
> }
> +unlock:
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -213,10 +219,11 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
> {
> struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map *map = map_to_storage(_map);
> struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage;
> - int cpu, off = 0;
> + void *ptr;
> u32 size;
> + int cpu;
>
> - if (map_flags != BPF_ANY && map_flags != BPF_EXIST)
> + if ((u32)map_flags & ~(BPF_ANY | BPF_EXIST | BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> @@ -232,12 +239,18 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
> * returned or zeros which were zero-filled by percpu_alloc,
> * so no kernel data leaks possible
> */
> - size = round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
> + size = (map_flags & (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)) ? _map->value_size :
> + round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
> + if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
> + cpu = map_flags >> 32;
> + memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), value, size);
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - bpf_long_memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu),
> - value + off, size);
> - off += size;
> + ptr = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + size * cpu;
> + memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), ptr, size);
> }
> +unlock:
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index ce525a474656a..b654115c99e01 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static int bpf_map_copy_value(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
> } else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY) {
> err = bpf_percpu_array_copy(map, key, value, flags);
> } else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE) {
> - err = bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(map, key, value);
> + err = bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(map, key, value, flags);
> } else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK_TRACE) {
> err = bpf_stackmap_extract(map, key, value, false);
> } else if (IS_FD_ARRAY(map) || IS_FD_PROG_ARRAY(map)) {
> --
> 2.51.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps
2025-10-06 22:33 ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2025-10-08 5:31 ` Leon Hwang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2025-10-08 5:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: bpf, ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87,
dxu, deso, kernel-patches-bot
On 7/10/25 06:33, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 8:40 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> Introduce BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps to
>> allow updating values for all CPUs with a single value for update_elem
>> API.
>>
>> Introduce BPF_F_CPU flag support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps to
>> allow:
>>
>> * update value for specified CPU for update_elem API.
>> * lookup value for specified CPU for lookup_elem API.
>>
>> The BPF_F_CPU flag is passed via map_flags along with embedded cpu info.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
>> ---
[...]
>> int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
>> - void *value)
>> + void *value, u64 map_flags)
>> {
>> struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map *map = map_to_storage(_map);
>> struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage;
>> @@ -198,12 +198,18 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
>> * access 'value_size' of them, so copying rounded areas
>> * will not leak any kernel data
>> */
>> + if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
>> + cpu = map_flags >> 32;
>> + memcpy(value, per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), _map->value_size);
>
> this is so far ok, because we don't seem to allow special fields for
> PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE, but it's best to switch this one to
> copy_map_value()
>
Agreed to use copy_map_value() here.
>> + goto unlock;
>> + }
>> size = round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
>> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> bpf_long_memcpy(value + off,
>> per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), size);
>
> and let's switch this to copy_map_value_long() to future-proof this:
> copy_map_value[_long]() should work correctly with any type of map and
> will take care of all existing and future special fields
>
> (but maybe have it as a separate patch with just that change to make it obvious)
>
Ack.
>> off += size;
>> }
>> +unlock:
>> rcu_read_unlock();
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -213,10 +219,11 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
>> {
>> struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map *map = map_to_storage(_map);
>> struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage;
>> - int cpu, off = 0;
>> + void *ptr;
>> u32 size;
>> + int cpu;
>>
>> - if (map_flags != BPF_ANY && map_flags != BPF_EXIST)
>> + if ((u32)map_flags & ~(BPF_ANY | BPF_EXIST | BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS))
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> rcu_read_lock();
>> @@ -232,12 +239,18 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
>> * returned or zeros which were zero-filled by percpu_alloc,
>> * so no kernel data leaks possible
>> */
>> - size = round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
>> + size = (map_flags & (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)) ? _map->value_size :
>> + round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
>> + if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
>> + cpu = map_flags >> 32;
>> + memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), value, size);
>> + goto unlock;
>> + }
>> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> - bpf_long_memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu),
>> - value + off, size);
>> - off += size;
>> + ptr = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + size * cpu;
>> + memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), ptr, size);
Switch memcpy() to copy_map_value[_long](), too.
Thanks,
Leon
[...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf-next v9 6/7] libbpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu maps
2025-09-30 15:39 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps Leon Hwang
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps Leon Hwang
@ 2025-09-30 15:39 ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add cases to test BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags Leon Hwang
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2025-09-30 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87, dxu,
deso, leon.hwang, kernel-patches-bot
Add libbpf support for the BPF_F_CPU flag for percpu maps by embedding the
cpu info into the high 32 bits of:
1. **flags**: bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(), bpf_map__lookup_elem(),
bpf_map_update_elem() and bpf_map__update_elem()
2. **opts->elem_flags**: bpf_map_lookup_batch() and
bpf_map_update_batch()
And the flag can be BPF_F_ALL_CPUS, but cannot be
'BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS'.
Behavior:
* If the flag is BPF_F_ALL_CPUS, the update is applied across all CPUs.
* If the flag is BPF_F_CPU, it updates value only to the specified CPU.
* If the flag is BPF_F_CPU, lookup value only from the specified CPU.
* lookup does not support BPF_F_ALL_CPUS.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h | 8 ++++++++
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 21 ++++++++-------------
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
index e983a3e40d612..ffd93feffd71d 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
@@ -289,6 +289,14 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(int fd, void *in_batch,
* Update spin_lock-ed map elements. This must be
* specified if the map value contains a spinlock.
*
+ * **BPF_F_CPU**
+ * As for percpu maps, update value on the specified CPU. And the cpu
+ * info is embedded into the high 32 bits of **opts->elem_flags**.
+ *
+ * **BPF_F_ALL_CPUS**
+ * As for percpu maps, update value across all CPUs. This flag cannot
+ * be used with BPF_F_CPU at the same time.
+ *
* @param fd BPF map file descriptor
* @param keys pointer to an array of *count* keys
* @param values pointer to an array of *count* values
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index f92083f51bdb3..4f73a54c0a81f 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -10671,7 +10671,7 @@ bpf_object__find_map_fd_by_name(const struct bpf_object *obj, const char *name)
}
static int validate_map_op(const struct bpf_map *map, size_t key_sz,
- size_t value_sz, bool check_value_sz)
+ size_t value_sz, bool check_value_sz, __u64 flags)
{
if (!map_is_created(map)) /* map is not yet created */
return -ENOENT;
@@ -10698,6 +10698,20 @@ static int validate_map_op(const struct bpf_map *map, size_t key_sz,
int num_cpu = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
size_t elem_sz = roundup(map->def.value_size, 8);
+ if (flags & (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)) {
+ if ((flags & BPF_F_CPU) && (flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)) {
+ pr_warn("map '%s': BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS are mutually exclusive\n",
+ map->name);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ if (map->def.value_size != value_sz) {
+ pr_warn("map '%s': unexpected value size %zu provided for either BPF_F_CPU or BPF_F_ALL_CPUS, expected %u\n",
+ map->name, value_sz, map->def.value_size);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+
if (value_sz != num_cpu * elem_sz) {
pr_warn("map '%s': unexpected value size %zu provided for per-CPU map, expected %d * %zu = %zd\n",
map->name, value_sz, num_cpu, elem_sz, num_cpu * elem_sz);
@@ -10722,7 +10736,7 @@ int bpf_map__lookup_elem(const struct bpf_map *map,
{
int err;
- err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, value_sz, true);
+ err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, value_sz, true, flags);
if (err)
return libbpf_err(err);
@@ -10735,7 +10749,7 @@ int bpf_map__update_elem(const struct bpf_map *map,
{
int err;
- err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, value_sz, true);
+ err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, value_sz, true, flags);
if (err)
return libbpf_err(err);
@@ -10747,7 +10761,7 @@ int bpf_map__delete_elem(const struct bpf_map *map,
{
int err;
- err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, 0, false /* check_value_sz */);
+ err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, 0, false /* check_value_sz */, flags);
if (err)
return libbpf_err(err);
@@ -10760,7 +10774,7 @@ int bpf_map__lookup_and_delete_elem(const struct bpf_map *map,
{
int err;
- err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, value_sz, true);
+ err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, value_sz, true, flags);
if (err)
return libbpf_err(err);
@@ -10772,7 +10786,7 @@ int bpf_map__get_next_key(const struct bpf_map *map,
{
int err;
- err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, 0, false /* check_value_sz */);
+ err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, 0, false /* check_value_sz */, 0);
if (err)
return libbpf_err(err);
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
index 5118d0a90e243..7c38b2e546080 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
@@ -1196,12 +1196,13 @@ LIBBPF_API struct bpf_map *bpf_map__inner_map(struct bpf_map *map);
* @param key_sz size in bytes of key data, needs to match BPF map definition's **key_size**
* @param value pointer to memory in which looked up value will be stored
* @param value_sz size in byte of value data memory; it has to match BPF map
- * definition's **value_size**. For per-CPU BPF maps value size has to be
- * a product of BPF map value size and number of possible CPUs in the system
- * (could be fetched with **libbpf_num_possible_cpus()**). Note also that for
- * per-CPU values value size has to be aligned up to closest 8 bytes for
- * alignment reasons, so expected size is: `round_up(value_size, 8)
- * * libbpf_num_possible_cpus()`.
+ * definition's **value_size**. For per-CPU BPF maps, value size can be
+ * `value_size` if either **BPF_F_CPU** or **BPF_F_ALL_CPUS** is specified
+ * in **flags**, otherwise a product of BPF map value size and number of
+ * possible CPUs in the system (could be fetched with
+ * **libbpf_num_possible_cpus()**). Note also that for per-CPU values value
+ * size has to be aligned up to closest 8 bytes, so expected size is:
+ * `round_up(value_size, 8) * libbpf_num_possible_cpus()`.
* @flags extra flags passed to kernel for this operation
* @return 0, on success; negative error, otherwise
*
@@ -1219,13 +1220,7 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_map__lookup_elem(const struct bpf_map *map,
* @param key pointer to memory containing bytes of the key
* @param key_sz size in bytes of key data, needs to match BPF map definition's **key_size**
* @param value pointer to memory containing bytes of the value
- * @param value_sz size in byte of value data memory; it has to match BPF map
- * definition's **value_size**. For per-CPU BPF maps value size has to be
- * a product of BPF map value size and number of possible CPUs in the system
- * (could be fetched with **libbpf_num_possible_cpus()**). Note also that for
- * per-CPU values value size has to be aligned up to closest 8 bytes for
- * alignment reasons, so expected size is: `round_up(value_size, 8)
- * * libbpf_num_possible_cpus()`.
+ * @param value_sz refer to **bpf_map__lookup_elem**'s description.'
* @flags extra flags passed to kernel for this operation
* @return 0, on success; negative error, otherwise
*
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [PATCH bpf-next v9 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add cases to test BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags
2025-09-30 15:39 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps Leon Hwang
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 6/7] libbpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu maps Leon Hwang
@ 2025-09-30 15:39 ` Leon Hwang
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2025-09-30 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87, dxu,
deso, leon.hwang, kernel-patches-bot
Add test coverage for the new BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support
in percpu maps. The following APIs are exercised:
* bpf_map_update_batch()
* bpf_map_lookup_batch()
* bpf_map_update_elem()
* bpf_map__update_elem()
* bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags()
* bpf_map__lookup_elem()
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c | 248 ++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_array.c | 32 +++
2 files changed, 280 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c
index 343da65864d6d..06e16cd646176 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "cgroup_helpers.h"
#include "percpu_alloc_array.skel.h"
#include "percpu_alloc_cgrp_local_storage.skel.h"
#include "percpu_alloc_fail.skel.h"
@@ -115,6 +116,245 @@ static void test_failure(void) {
RUN_TESTS(percpu_alloc_fail);
}
+static void test_percpu_map_op_cpu_flag(struct bpf_map *map, void *keys, size_t key_sz,
+ u32 max_entries, bool test_batch)
+{
+ size_t value_sz = sizeof(u32), value_sz_cpus, value_sz_total;
+ u32 *values = NULL, *values_percpu = NULL;
+ int i, j, cpu, map_fd, nr_cpus, err;
+ const u32 value = 0xDEADC0DE;
+ u32 count = max_entries, v;
+ u64 batch = 0, flags;
+ void *values_row;
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_batch_opts, batch_opts);
+
+ nr_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
+ if (!ASSERT_GT(nr_cpus, 0, "libbpf_num_possible_cpus"))
+ return;
+
+ value_sz_cpus = value_sz * nr_cpus;
+ values = calloc(max_entries, value_sz_cpus);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(values, "calloc values"))
+ return;
+
+ values_percpu = calloc(max_entries, roundup(value_sz, 8) * nr_cpus);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(values_percpu, "calloc values_percpu")) {
+ free(values);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ value_sz_total = value_sz_cpus * max_entries;
+ memset(values, 0, value_sz_total);
+
+ map_fd = bpf_map__fd(map);
+ flags = BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS;
+ err = bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(map_fd, keys, values, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags err"))
+ goto out;
+
+ err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, keys, values, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_map_update_elem err"))
+ goto out;
+
+ flags = (u64)nr_cpus << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;
+ err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, keys, values, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -ERANGE, "bpf_map_update_elem -ERANGE"))
+ goto out;
+
+ err = bpf_map__update_elem(map, keys, key_sz, values, value_sz, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -ERANGE, "bpf_map__update_elem -ERANGE"))
+ goto out;
+
+ err = bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(map_fd, keys, values, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -ERANGE, "bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags -ERANGE"))
+ goto out;
+
+ err = bpf_map__lookup_elem(map, keys, key_sz, values, value_sz, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -ERANGE, "bpf_map__lookup_elem -ERANGE"))
+ goto out;
+
+ for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpus; cpu++) {
+ /* clear value on all cpus */
+ values[0] = 0;
+ flags = BPF_F_ALL_CPUS;
+ for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) {
+ err = bpf_map__update_elem(map, keys + i * key_sz, key_sz, values,
+ value_sz, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__update_elem all_cpus"))
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /* update value on specified cpu */
+ for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) {
+ values[0] = value;
+ flags = (u64)cpu << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;
+ err = bpf_map__update_elem(map, keys + i * key_sz, key_sz, values,
+ value_sz, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__update_elem specified cpu"))
+ goto out;
+
+ /* lookup then check value on CPUs */
+ for (j = 0; j < nr_cpus; j++) {
+ flags = (u64)j << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;
+ err = bpf_map__lookup_elem(map, keys + i * key_sz, key_sz, values,
+ value_sz, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__lookup_elem specified cpu"))
+ goto out;
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(values[0], j != cpu ? 0 : value,
+ "bpf_map__lookup_elem value on specified cpu"))
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!test_batch)
+ goto out;
+
+ batch_opts.elem_flags = (u64)nr_cpus << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;
+ err = bpf_map_update_batch(map_fd, keys, values, &max_entries, &batch_opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -ERANGE, "bpf_map_update_batch -ERANGE"))
+ goto out;
+
+ for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpus; cpu++) {
+ memset(values, 0, value_sz_total);
+
+ /* clear values across all CPUs */
+ batch_opts.elem_flags = BPF_F_ALL_CPUS;
+ err = bpf_map_update_batch(map_fd, keys, values, &max_entries, &batch_opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_batch all_cpus"))
+ goto out;
+
+ /* update values on specified CPU */
+ for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++)
+ values[i] = value;
+
+ batch_opts.elem_flags = (u64)cpu << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;
+ err = bpf_map_update_batch(map_fd, keys, values, &max_entries, &batch_opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_batch specified cpu"))
+ goto out;
+
+ /* lookup values on specified CPU */
+ memset(values, 0, max_entries * value_sz);
+ err = bpf_map_lookup_batch(map_fd, NULL, &batch, keys, values, &count, &batch_opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_TRUE(!err || err == -ENOENT, "bpf_map_lookup_batch specified cpu"))
+ goto out;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++)
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(values[i], value,
+ "bpf_map_lookup_batch value on specified cpu"))
+ goto out;
+
+ /* lookup values from all CPUs */
+ batch_opts.elem_flags = 0;
+ memset(values_percpu, 0, roundup(value_sz, 8) * nr_cpus * max_entries);
+ err = bpf_map_lookup_batch(map_fd, NULL, &batch, keys, values_percpu, &count,
+ &batch_opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_TRUE(!err || err == -ENOENT, "bpf_map_lookup_batch all_cpus"))
+ goto out;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) {
+ values_row = (void *) values_percpu +
+ roundup(value_sz, 8) * i * nr_cpus;
+ for (j = 0; j < nr_cpus; j++) {
+ v = *(u32 *) (values_row + roundup(value_sz, 8) * j);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(v, j != cpu ? 0 : value,
+ "bpf_map_lookup_batch value all_cpus"))
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+out:
+ free(values_percpu);
+ free(values);
+}
+
+static void test_percpu_map_cpu_flag(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
+{
+ struct percpu_alloc_array *skel;
+ size_t key_sz = sizeof(int);
+ int *keys = NULL, i, err;
+ struct bpf_map *map;
+ u32 max_entries;
+
+ skel = percpu_alloc_array__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "percpu_alloc_array__open"))
+ return;
+
+ map = skel->maps.percpu;
+ bpf_map__set_type(map, map_type);
+
+ err = percpu_alloc_array__load(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_percpu_alloc__load"))
+ goto out;
+
+ max_entries = bpf_map__max_entries(map);
+ keys = calloc(max_entries, key_sz);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(keys, "calloc keys"))
+ goto out;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++)
+ keys[i] = i;
+
+ test_percpu_map_op_cpu_flag(map, keys, key_sz, max_entries, true);
+out:
+ if (keys)
+ free(keys);
+ percpu_alloc_array__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_percpu_array_cpu_flag(void)
+{
+ test_percpu_map_cpu_flag(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY);
+}
+
+static void test_percpu_hash_cpu_flag(void)
+{
+ test_percpu_map_cpu_flag(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH);
+}
+
+static void test_lru_percpu_hash_cpu_flag(void)
+{
+ test_percpu_map_cpu_flag(BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH);
+}
+
+static void test_percpu_cgroup_storage_cpu_flag(void)
+{
+ struct bpf_cgroup_storage_key key;
+ struct percpu_alloc_array *skel;
+ int cgroup = -1, prog_fd, err;
+ struct bpf_map *map;
+
+ skel = percpu_alloc_array__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "percpu_alloc_array__open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ cgroup = create_and_get_cgroup("/cg_percpu");
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup, 0, "create_and_get_cgroup"))
+ goto out;
+
+ err = join_cgroup("/cg_percpu");
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "join_cgroup"))
+ goto out;
+
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.cgroup_egress);
+ err = bpf_prog_attach(prog_fd, cgroup, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_attach"))
+ goto out;
+
+ map = skel->maps.percpu_cgroup_storage;
+ err = bpf_map_get_next_key(bpf_map__fd(map), NULL, &key);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_get_next_key"))
+ goto out;
+
+ test_percpu_map_op_cpu_flag(map, &key, sizeof(key), 1, false);
+out:
+ bpf_prog_detach2(-1, cgroup, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS);
+ close(cgroup);
+ cleanup_cgroup_environment();
+ percpu_alloc_array__destroy(skel);
+}
+
void test_percpu_alloc(void)
{
if (test__start_subtest("array"))
@@ -125,4 +365,12 @@ void test_percpu_alloc(void)
test_cgrp_local_storage();
if (test__start_subtest("failure_tests"))
test_failure();
+ if (test__start_subtest("cpu_flag_percpu_array"))
+ test_percpu_array_cpu_flag();
+ if (test__start_subtest("cpu_flag_percpu_hash"))
+ test_percpu_hash_cpu_flag();
+ if (test__start_subtest("cpu_flag_lru_percpu_hash"))
+ test_lru_percpu_hash_cpu_flag();
+ if (test__start_subtest("cpu_flag_percpu_cgroup_storage"))
+ test_percpu_cgroup_storage_cpu_flag();
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_array.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_array.c
index 37c2d2608ec0b..ed6a2a93d5a51 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_array.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_array.c
@@ -187,4 +187,36 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_array_map_10)
return 0;
}
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY);
+ __uint(max_entries, 2);
+ __type(key, int);
+ __type(value, u32);
+} percpu SEC(".maps");
+
+SEC("?fentry/bpf_fentry_test1")
+int BPF_PROG(test_percpu_array, int x)
+{
+ u64 value = 0xDEADC0DE;
+ int key = 0;
+
+ bpf_map_update_elem(&percpu, &key, &value, BPF_ANY);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE);
+ __type(key, struct bpf_cgroup_storage_key);
+ __type(value, u32);
+} percpu_cgroup_storage SEC(".maps");
+
+SEC("cgroup_skb/egress")
+int cgroup_egress(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ u32 *val = bpf_get_local_storage(&percpu_cgroup_storage, 0);
+
+ *val = 1;
+ return 1;
+}
+
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread