public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	jolsa@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
	eddyz87@gmail.com, dxu@dxuuu.xyz, deso@posteo.net,
	leon.hwang@linux.dev, kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 23:39:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250930153942.41781-6-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250930153942.41781-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>

Introduce BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps to
allow updating values for all CPUs with a single value for update_elem
API.

Introduce BPF_F_CPU flag support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps to
allow:

* update value for specified CPU for update_elem API.
* lookup value for specified CPU for lookup_elem API.

The BPF_F_CPU flag is passed via map_flags along with embedded cpu info.

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h |  4 ++--
 include/linux/bpf.h        |  1 +
 kernel/bpf/local_storage.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c       |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
index aedf573bdb426..013f4db9903fd 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ void bpf_cgroup_storage_link(struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage,
 void bpf_cgroup_storage_unlink(struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage);
 int bpf_cgroup_storage_assign(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux, struct bpf_map *map);
 
-int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value);
+int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 flags);
 int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 				     void *value, u64 flags);
 
@@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static inline struct bpf_cgroup_storage *bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(
 static inline void bpf_cgroup_storage_free(
 	struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage) {}
 static inline int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
-						 void *value) {
+						 void *value, u64 flags) {
 	return 0;
 }
 static inline int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *map,
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index b3d9a584f34e2..6250804394b53 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -3774,6 +3774,7 @@ static inline bool bpf_map_supports_cpu_flags(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
 	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY:
 	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH:
 	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH:
+	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE:
 		return true;
 	default:
 		return false;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
index c93a756e035c0..f5188e0afa478 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static long cgroup_storage_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 }
 
 int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
-				   void *value)
+				   void *value, u64 map_flags)
 {
 	struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map *map = map_to_storage(_map);
 	struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage;
@@ -198,12 +198,18 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
 	 * access 'value_size' of them, so copying rounded areas
 	 * will not leak any kernel data
 	 */
+	if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
+		cpu = map_flags >> 32;
+		memcpy(value, per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), _map->value_size);
+		goto unlock;
+	}
 	size = round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		bpf_long_memcpy(value + off,
 				per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), size);
 		off += size;
 	}
+unlock:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -213,10 +219,11 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
 {
 	struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map *map = map_to_storage(_map);
 	struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage;
-	int cpu, off = 0;
+	void *ptr;
 	u32 size;
+	int cpu;
 
-	if (map_flags != BPF_ANY && map_flags != BPF_EXIST)
+	if ((u32)map_flags & ~(BPF_ANY | BPF_EXIST | BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
@@ -232,12 +239,18 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
 	 * returned or zeros which were zero-filled by percpu_alloc,
 	 * so no kernel data leaks possible
 	 */
-	size = round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
+	size = (map_flags & (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)) ? _map->value_size :
+		round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
+	if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
+		cpu = map_flags >> 32;
+		memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), value, size);
+		goto unlock;
+	}
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-		bpf_long_memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu),
-				value + off, size);
-		off += size;
+		ptr = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + size * cpu;
+		memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), ptr, size);
 	}
+unlock:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index ce525a474656a..b654115c99e01 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static int bpf_map_copy_value(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
 	} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY) {
 		err = bpf_percpu_array_copy(map, key, value, flags);
 	} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE) {
-		err = bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(map, key, value);
+		err = bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(map, key, value, flags);
 	} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK_TRACE) {
 		err = bpf_stackmap_extract(map, key, value, false);
 	} else if (IS_FD_ARRAY(map) || IS_FD_PROG_ARRAY(map)) {
-- 
2.51.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-30 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-30 15:39 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/7] bpf: Introduce internal bpf_map_check_op_flags helper function Leon Hwang
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags Leon Hwang
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_array maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps Leon Hwang
2025-10-06 22:29   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-08  4:48     ` Leon Hwang
2025-10-13 23:17       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-30 15:39 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2025-10-06 22:33   ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-08  5:31     ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 6/7] libbpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add cases to test BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags Leon Hwang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250930153942.41781-6-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=deso@posteo.net \
    --cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox