From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 03/10] bpf: Refactor reporting log_true_size for prog_load
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 23:48:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251002154841.99348-4-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251002154841.99348-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
In the next commit, it will be able to report logs via extended common
attributes, which will report 'log_true_size' via the extended common
attributes meanwhile.
Therefore, refactor the way of 'log_true_size' reporting in order to
report 'log_true_size' via the extended common attributes easily.
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 2 +-
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 12 ++----------
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index a98c833461347..4f595439943d7 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2738,7 +2738,7 @@ int bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero(bpfptr_t uaddr, size_t expected_size,
size_t actual_size);
/* verify correctness of eBPF program */
-int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **fp, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size);
+int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **fp, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr);
#ifndef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
void bpf_patch_call_args(struct bpf_insn *insn, u32 stack_depth);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 8d97d67e6abaa..2bdc0b43ec832 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -2841,7 +2841,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_verify_signature(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr
/* last field in 'union bpf_attr' used by this command */
#define BPF_PROG_LOAD_LAST_FIELD keyring_id
-static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
+static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
{
enum bpf_prog_type type = attr->prog_type;
struct bpf_prog *prog, *dst_prog = NULL;
@@ -3059,7 +3059,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
goto free_prog_sec;
/* run eBPF verifier */
- err = bpf_check(&prog, attr, uattr, uattr_size);
+ err = bpf_check(&prog, attr, uattr);
if (err < 0)
goto free_used_maps;
@@ -6092,12 +6092,25 @@ static int prog_stream_read(union bpf_attr *attr)
return ret;
}
+static int copy_prog_load_log_true_size(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, unsigned int size)
+{
+ if (!attr->log_true_size)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (size >= offsetofend(union bpf_attr, log_true_size) &&
+ copy_to_bpfptr_offset(uattr, offsetof(union bpf_attr, log_true_size),
+ &attr->log_true_size, sizeof(attr->log_true_size)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int __sys_bpf(enum bpf_cmd cmd, bpfptr_t uattr, unsigned int size,
bpfptr_t uattr_common, unsigned int size_common)
{
struct bpf_common_attr common_attrs;
union bpf_attr attr;
- int err;
+ int err, ret;
err = bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero(uattr, sizeof(attr), size);
if (err)
@@ -6145,7 +6158,10 @@ static int __sys_bpf(enum bpf_cmd cmd, bpfptr_t uattr, unsigned int size,
err = map_freeze(&attr);
break;
case BPF_PROG_LOAD:
- err = bpf_prog_load(&attr, uattr, size);
+ attr.log_true_size = 0;
+ err = bpf_prog_load(&attr, uattr);
+ ret = copy_prog_load_log_true_size(&attr, uattr, size);
+ err = ret ? ret : err;
break;
case BPF_OBJ_PIN:
err = bpf_obj_pin(&attr);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index e892df386eed7..d5089f026f578 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -24499,12 +24499,11 @@ static int compute_scc(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
return err;
}
-int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, __u32 uattr_size)
+int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
{
u64 start_time = ktime_get_ns();
struct bpf_verifier_env *env;
int i, len, ret = -EINVAL, err;
- u32 log_true_size;
bool is_priv;
BTF_TYPE_EMIT(enum bpf_features);
@@ -24700,17 +24699,10 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, __u3
env->prog->aux->verified_insns = env->insn_processed;
/* preserve original error even if log finalization is successful */
- err = bpf_vlog_finalize(&env->log, &log_true_size);
+ err = bpf_vlog_finalize(&env->log, &attr->log_true_size);
if (err)
ret = err;
- if (uattr_size >= offsetofend(union bpf_attr, log_true_size) &&
- copy_to_bpfptr_offset(uattr, offsetof(union bpf_attr, log_true_size),
- &log_true_size, sizeof(log_true_size))) {
- ret = -EFAULT;
- goto err_release_maps;
- }
-
if (ret)
goto err_release_maps;
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-02 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-02 15:48 [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 00/10] bpf: Extend bpf syscall with common attributes support Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 01/10] " Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 02/10] libbpf: Add support for extended bpf syscall Leon Hwang
2025-10-06 23:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-09 5:15 ` Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 15:48 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2025-10-02 18:34 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 03/10] bpf: Refactor reporting log_true_size for prog_load Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-03 2:06 ` Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 04/10] bpf: Add common attr support " Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 23:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-03 2:25 ` Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 05/10] bpf: Refactor reporting btf_log_true_size for btf_load Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 06/10] bpf: Add common attr support " Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 07/10] bpf: Add warnings for internal bugs in map_create Leon Hwang
2025-10-03 0:06 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-03 2:31 ` Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 08/10] bpf: Add common attr support for map_create Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 09/10] libbpf: " Leon Hwang
2025-10-06 23:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-09 5:35 ` Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 10/10] selftests/bpf: Add cases to test map create failure log Leon Hwang
2025-10-03 6:38 ` [syzbot ci] Re: bpf: Extend bpf syscall with common attributes support syzbot ci
2025-10-03 6:44 ` Leon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251002154841.99348-4-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox