* [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Avoid RCU context warning when unpinning htab with internal structs
@ 2025-10-08 10:26 KaFai Wan
2025-10-08 10:26 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] " KaFai Wan
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: KaFai Wan @ 2025-10-08 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song, yonghong.song,
john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, shuah, kafai.wan,
toke, linux-kernel, bpf, linux-kselftest
This small patchset is about avoid RCU context warning when unpinning
htab with internal structs (timer, workqueue, or task_work).
v3:
- fix nit (Yonghong Song)
- add Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
v2:
- rename bpf_free_inode() to bpf_destroy_inode() (Andrii)
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251007012235.755853-1-kafai.wan@linux.dev/
v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251003084528.502518-1-kafai.wan@linux.dev/
---
KaFai Wan (2):
bpf: Avoid RCU context warning when unpinning htab with internal
structs
selftests/bpf: Add test for unpinning htab with internal timer struct
kernel/bpf/inode.c | 4 +--
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/pinning_htab.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/test_pinning_htab.c | 25 +++++++++++++
3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/pinning_htab.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pinning_htab.c
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] bpf: Avoid RCU context warning when unpinning htab with internal structs
2025-10-08 10:26 [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Avoid RCU context warning when unpinning htab with internal structs KaFai Wan
@ 2025-10-08 10:26 ` KaFai Wan
2025-10-08 10:26 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for unpinning htab with internal timer struct KaFai Wan
2025-10-10 17:30 ` [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Avoid RCU context warning when unpinning htab with internal structs patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: KaFai Wan @ 2025-10-08 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song, yonghong.song,
john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, shuah, kafai.wan,
toke, linux-kernel, bpf, linux-kselftest
Cc: Le Chen
When unpinning a BPF hash table (htab or htab_lru) that contains internal
structures (timer, workqueue, or task_work) in its values, a BUG warning
is triggered:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:244
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 14, name: ksoftirqd/0
...
The issue arises from the interaction between BPF object unpinning and
RCU callback mechanisms:
1. BPF object unpinning uses ->free_inode() which schedules cleanup via
call_rcu(), deferring the actual freeing to an RCU callback that
executes within the RCU_SOFTIRQ context.
2. During cleanup of hash tables containing internal structures,
htab_map_free_internal_structs() is invoked, which includes
cond_resched() or cond_resched_rcu() calls to yield the CPU during
potentially long operations.
However, cond_resched() or cond_resched_rcu() cannot be safely called from
atomic RCU softirq context, leading to the BUG warning when attempting
to reschedule.
Fix this by changing from ->free_inode() to ->destroy_inode() and rename
bpf_free_inode() to bpf_destroy_inode() for BPF objects (prog, map, link).
This allows direct inode freeing without RCU callback scheduling,
avoiding the invalid context warning.
Reported-by: Le Chen <tom2cat@sjtu.edu.cn>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1444123482.1827743.1750996347470.JavaMail.zimbra@sjtu.edu.cn/
Fixes: 68134668c17f ("bpf: Add map side support for bpf timers.")
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
kernel/bpf/inode.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/inode.c b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
index f90bdcc0a047..81780bcf8d25 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/inode.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
@@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ static int bpf_show_options(struct seq_file *m, struct dentry *root)
return 0;
}
-static void bpf_free_inode(struct inode *inode)
+static void bpf_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
{
enum bpf_type type;
@@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ const struct super_operations bpf_super_ops = {
.statfs = simple_statfs,
.drop_inode = inode_just_drop,
.show_options = bpf_show_options,
- .free_inode = bpf_free_inode,
+ .destroy_inode = bpf_destroy_inode,
};
enum {
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for unpinning htab with internal timer struct
2025-10-08 10:26 [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Avoid RCU context warning when unpinning htab with internal structs KaFai Wan
2025-10-08 10:26 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] " KaFai Wan
@ 2025-10-08 10:26 ` KaFai Wan
2025-10-10 17:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-10 17:30 ` [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Avoid RCU context warning when unpinning htab with internal structs patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: KaFai Wan @ 2025-10-08 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song, yonghong.song,
john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, shuah, kafai.wan,
toke, linux-kernel, bpf, linux-kselftest
Add test to verify that unpinning hash tables containing internal timer
structures does not trigger context warnings.
Each subtest (timer_prealloc and timer_no_prealloc) can trigger the
context warning when unpinning, but the warning cannot be triggered
twice within a short time interval (a HZ), which is expected behavior.
Signed-off-by: KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/pinning_htab.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/test_pinning_htab.c | 25 +++++++++++++
2 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/pinning_htab.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pinning_htab.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/pinning_htab.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/pinning_htab.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..16bd74be3dbe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/pinning_htab.c
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "test_pinning_htab.skel.h"
+
+static void unpin_map(const char *map_name, const char *pin_path)
+{
+ struct test_pinning_htab *skel;
+ struct bpf_map *map;
+ int err;
+
+ skel = test_pinning_htab__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(skel->obj, map_name);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(map, "bpf_object__find_map_by_name"))
+ goto out;
+
+ err = bpf_map__pin(map, pin_path);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__pin"))
+ goto out;
+
+ err = bpf_map__unpin(map, pin_path);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__unpin");
+out:
+ test_pinning_htab__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+void test_pinning_htab(void)
+{
+ if (test__start_subtest("timer_prealloc"))
+ unpin_map("timer_prealloc", "/sys/fs/bpf/timer_prealloc");
+ if (test__start_subtest("timer_no_prealloc"))
+ unpin_map("timer_no_prealloc", "/sys/fs/bpf/timer_no_prealloc");
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pinning_htab.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pinning_htab.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ae227930c73c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pinning_htab.c
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+struct timer_val {
+ struct bpf_timer timer;
+};
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+ __type(key, __u32);
+ __type(value, struct timer_val);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+} timer_prealloc SEC(".maps");
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+ __type(key, __u32);
+ __type(value, struct timer_val);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
+} timer_no_prealloc SEC(".maps");
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for unpinning htab with internal timer struct
2025-10-08 10:26 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for unpinning htab with internal timer struct KaFai Wan
@ 2025-10-10 17:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-11 15:09 ` KaFai Wan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2025-10-10 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KaFai Wan
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko,
Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa, Shuah Khan,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen, LKML, bpf,
open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK
On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 3:27 AM KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> Add test to verify that unpinning hash tables containing internal timer
> structures does not trigger context warnings.
>
> Each subtest (timer_prealloc and timer_no_prealloc) can trigger the
> context warning when unpinning, but the warning cannot be triggered
> twice within a short time interval (a HZ), which is expected behavior.
It was difficult to decipher the above paragraph.
I think you're referring to throttling logic in __might_resched().
I kept it as-is while applying, but in the future either skip
such low level implementation detail or expand it.
Here you could have said that the error is printed by __might_resched()
which prints it once a HZ.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Avoid RCU context warning when unpinning htab with internal structs
2025-10-08 10:26 [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Avoid RCU context warning when unpinning htab with internal structs KaFai Wan
2025-10-08 10:26 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] " KaFai Wan
2025-10-08 10:26 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for unpinning htab with internal timer struct KaFai Wan
@ 2025-10-10 17:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2025-10-10 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KaFai Wan
Cc: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song, yonghong.song,
john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, shuah, toke,
linux-kernel, bpf, linux-kselftest
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2025 18:26:25 +0800 you wrote:
> This small patchset is about avoid RCU context warning when unpinning
> htab with internal structs (timer, workqueue, or task_work).
>
> v3:
> - fix nit (Yonghong Song)
> - add Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf,v3,1/2] bpf: Avoid RCU context warning when unpinning htab with internal structs
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/4f375ade6aa9
- [bpf,v3,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for unpinning htab with internal timer struct
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/accb9a7e87f0
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for unpinning htab with internal timer struct
2025-10-10 17:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
@ 2025-10-11 15:09 ` KaFai Wan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: KaFai Wan @ 2025-10-11 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexei Starovoitov
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko,
Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa, Shuah Khan,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen, LKML, bpf,
open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK
On Fri, 2025-10-10 at 10:28 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 3:27 AM KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@linux.dev> wrote:
> >
> > Add test to verify that unpinning hash tables containing internal timer
> > structures does not trigger context warnings.
> >
> > Each subtest (timer_prealloc and timer_no_prealloc) can trigger the
> > context warning when unpinning, but the warning cannot be triggered
> > twice within a short time interval (a HZ), which is expected behavior.
>
> It was difficult to decipher the above paragraph.
> I think you're referring to throttling logic in __might_resched().
>
> I kept it as-is while applying, but in the future either skip
> such low level implementation detail or expand it.
> Here you could have said that the error is printed by __might_resched()
> which prints it once a HZ.
OK, I understand. Thanks for your feedback and guidance.
--
Thanks,
KaFai
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-11 15:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-08 10:26 [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Avoid RCU context warning when unpinning htab with internal structs KaFai Wan
2025-10-08 10:26 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] " KaFai Wan
2025-10-08 10:26 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for unpinning htab with internal timer struct KaFai Wan
2025-10-10 17:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-11 15:09 ` KaFai Wan
2025-10-10 17:30 ` [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Avoid RCU context warning when unpinning htab with internal structs patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox