public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: patches@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jiawei Zhao <phoenix500526@163.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	eddyz87@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.17-6.12] libbpf: Fix USDT SIB argument handling causing unrecognized register error
Date: Thu,  9 Oct 2025 11:55:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251009155752.773732-61-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251009155752.773732-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Jiawei Zhao <phoenix500526@163.com>

[ Upstream commit 758acb9ccfdbf854b55abaceaf1f3f229cde3d19 ]

On x86-64, USDT arguments can be specified using Scale-Index-Base (SIB)
addressing, e.g. "1@-96(%rbp,%rax,8)". The current USDT implementation
in libbpf cannot parse this format, causing `bpf_program__attach_usdt()`
to fail with -ENOENT (unrecognized register).

This patch fixes this by implementing the necessary changes:
- add correct handling for SIB-addressed arguments in `bpf_usdt_arg`.
- add adaptive support to `__bpf_usdt_arg_type` and
  `__bpf_usdt_arg_spec` to represent SIB addressing parameters.

Signed-off-by: Jiawei Zhao <phoenix500526@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250827053128.1301287-2-phoenix500526@163.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---

LLM Generated explanations, may be completely bogus:

Based on my comprehensive analysis of this commit, here is my
assessment:

## **Backport Status: YES**

### **Analysis Summary:**

**1. Nature of the Fix:**
This commit fixes a **longstanding bug** in libbpf's USDT (User
Statically-Defined Tracing) implementation. The bug has existed since
the original x86 USDT support was added in April 2022 (commit
4c59e584d1581).

**2. User Impact:**
- **High Impact:** When GCC compiles USDT programs with `-O1` or higher
  optimization, it generates SIB (Scale-Index-Base) addressing mode for
  global array access, e.g., `"1@-96(%rbp,%rax,8)"`
- **Failure Mode:** `bpf_program__attach_usdt()` fails with `-ENOENT`
  (unrecognized register) when encountering SIB addressing
- **Common Scenario:** This affects any optimized build using USDT
  probes with array access, which is a standard use case

**3. Fix Quality:**
- **Well-designed:** The struct changes are explicitly designed for
  backward/forward compatibility
- **Tested:** Includes comprehensive test coverage (commit 69424097ee106
  / 080e6de1c87ef)
- **Contained:** Changes are confined to USDT subsystem in libbpf
  (tools/lib/bpf/)
- **No regression risk:** Only affects USDT argument parsing; existing
  functionality preserved

**4. Technical Details of Fix:**
```
tools/lib/bpf/usdt.bpf.h:17-38 - Adds BPF_USDT_ARG_SIB enum value
tools/lib/bpf/usdt.bpf.h:42-66 - Modifies struct with bitfields for
idx_reg_off and scale_bitshift
tools/lib/bpf/usdt.bpf.h:204-244 - Implements SIB calculation: base +
(index << scale) + offset
tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c:1277-1326 - Adds sscanf patterns to parse SIB
formats
```

**5. Stable Kernel Criteria:**
✅ **Fixes important bug affecting users** - Yes, prevents USDT
attachment failures
✅ **Small and contained** - Changes isolated to USDT subsystem
✅ **Minimal regression risk** - Compatibility designed in, well-tested
✅ **No architectural changes** - Follows existing ARG_REG_DEREF pattern
✅ **Not a new feature** - Fixes missing support for standard x86
addressing mode

**6. Compatibility Considerations:**
- The comment states: "ARG_SIB requires libbpf v1.7+"
- Struct layout uses bitfields with conditional compilation for
  endianness
- Designed to maintain offset stability for `reg_off` field
- Old code reading old specs continues to work
- New spec type only used when SIB addressing is detected

**Note:** This commit has already been backported to this tree as
**b70c5bb3cd541**, confirming its suitability for stable kernels.

 tools/lib/bpf/usdt.bpf.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c     | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.bpf.h
index 2a7865c8e3fe3..43deb05a51970 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.bpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.bpf.h
@@ -34,13 +34,32 @@ enum __bpf_usdt_arg_type {
 	BPF_USDT_ARG_CONST,
 	BPF_USDT_ARG_REG,
 	BPF_USDT_ARG_REG_DEREF,
+	BPF_USDT_ARG_SIB,
 };
 
+/*
+ * This struct layout is designed specifically to be backwards/forward
+ * compatible between libbpf versions for ARG_CONST, ARG_REG, and
+ * ARG_REG_DEREF modes. ARG_SIB requires libbpf v1.7+.
+ */
 struct __bpf_usdt_arg_spec {
 	/* u64 scalar interpreted depending on arg_type, see below */
 	__u64 val_off;
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
 	/* arg location case, see bpf_usdt_arg() for details */
-	enum __bpf_usdt_arg_type arg_type;
+	enum __bpf_usdt_arg_type arg_type: 8;
+	/* index register offset within struct pt_regs */
+	__u16 idx_reg_off: 12;
+	/* scale factor for index register (1, 2, 4, or 8) */
+	__u16 scale_bitshift: 4;
+	/* reserved for future use, keeps reg_off offset stable */
+	__u8 __reserved: 8;
+#else
+	__u8 __reserved: 8;
+	__u16 idx_reg_off: 12;
+	__u16 scale_bitshift: 4;
+	enum __bpf_usdt_arg_type arg_type: 8;
+#endif
 	/* offset of referenced register within struct pt_regs */
 	short reg_off;
 	/* whether arg should be interpreted as signed value */
@@ -149,7 +168,7 @@ int bpf_usdt_arg(struct pt_regs *ctx, __u64 arg_num, long *res)
 {
 	struct __bpf_usdt_spec *spec;
 	struct __bpf_usdt_arg_spec *arg_spec;
-	unsigned long val;
+	unsigned long val, idx;
 	int err, spec_id;
 
 	*res = 0;
@@ -202,6 +221,27 @@ int bpf_usdt_arg(struct pt_regs *ctx, __u64 arg_num, long *res)
 			return err;
 #if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
 		val >>= arg_spec->arg_bitshift;
+#endif
+		break;
+	case BPF_USDT_ARG_SIB:
+		/* Arg is in memory addressed by SIB (Scale-Index-Base) mode
+		 * (e.g., "-1@-96(%rbp,%rax,8)" in USDT arg spec). We first
+		 * fetch the base register contents and the index register
+		 * contents from pt_regs. Then we calculate the final address
+		 * as base + (index * scale) + offset, and do a user-space
+		 * probe read to fetch the argument value.
+		 */
+		err = bpf_probe_read_kernel(&val, sizeof(val), (void *)ctx + arg_spec->reg_off);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+		err = bpf_probe_read_kernel(&idx, sizeof(idx), (void *)ctx + arg_spec->idx_reg_off);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+		err = bpf_probe_read_user(&val, sizeof(val), (void *)(val + (idx << arg_spec->scale_bitshift) + arg_spec->val_off));
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
+		val >>= arg_spec->arg_bitshift;
 #endif
 		break;
 	default:
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c b/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c
index 3373b9d45ac44..867bff6b06990 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c
@@ -200,12 +200,23 @@ enum usdt_arg_type {
 	USDT_ARG_CONST,
 	USDT_ARG_REG,
 	USDT_ARG_REG_DEREF,
+	USDT_ARG_SIB,
 };
 
 /* should match exactly struct __bpf_usdt_arg_spec from usdt.bpf.h */
 struct usdt_arg_spec {
 	__u64 val_off;
-	enum usdt_arg_type arg_type;
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
+	enum usdt_arg_type arg_type: 8;
+	__u16	idx_reg_off: 12;
+	__u16	scale_bitshift: 4;
+	__u8 __reserved: 8;     /* keep reg_off offset stable */
+#else
+	__u8 __reserved: 8;     /* keep reg_off offset stable */
+	__u16	idx_reg_off: 12;
+	__u16	scale_bitshift: 4;
+	enum usdt_arg_type arg_type: 8;
+#endif
 	short reg_off;
 	bool arg_signed;
 	char arg_bitshift;
@@ -1283,11 +1294,51 @@ static int calc_pt_regs_off(const char *reg_name)
 
 static int parse_usdt_arg(const char *arg_str, int arg_num, struct usdt_arg_spec *arg, int *arg_sz)
 {
-	char reg_name[16];
-	int len, reg_off;
-	long off;
+	char reg_name[16] = {0}, idx_reg_name[16] = {0};
+	int len, reg_off, idx_reg_off, scale = 1;
+	long off = 0;
+
+	if (sscanf(arg_str, " %d @ %ld ( %%%15[^,] , %%%15[^,] , %d ) %n",
+		   arg_sz, &off, reg_name, idx_reg_name, &scale, &len) == 5 ||
+		sscanf(arg_str, " %d @ ( %%%15[^,] , %%%15[^,] , %d ) %n",
+		       arg_sz, reg_name, idx_reg_name, &scale, &len) == 4 ||
+		sscanf(arg_str, " %d @ %ld ( %%%15[^,] , %%%15[^)] ) %n",
+		       arg_sz, &off, reg_name, idx_reg_name, &len) == 4 ||
+		sscanf(arg_str, " %d @ ( %%%15[^,] , %%%15[^)] ) %n",
+		       arg_sz, reg_name, idx_reg_name, &len) == 3
+		) {
+		/*
+		 * Scale Index Base case:
+		 * 1@-96(%rbp,%rax,8)
+		 * 1@(%rbp,%rax,8)
+		 * 1@-96(%rbp,%rax)
+		 * 1@(%rbp,%rax)
+		 */
+		arg->arg_type = USDT_ARG_SIB;
+		arg->val_off = off;
 
-	if (sscanf(arg_str, " %d @ %ld ( %%%15[^)] ) %n", arg_sz, &off, reg_name, &len) == 3) {
+		reg_off = calc_pt_regs_off(reg_name);
+		if (reg_off < 0)
+			return reg_off;
+		arg->reg_off = reg_off;
+
+		idx_reg_off = calc_pt_regs_off(idx_reg_name);
+		if (idx_reg_off < 0)
+			return idx_reg_off;
+		arg->idx_reg_off = idx_reg_off;
+
+		/* validate scale factor and set fields directly */
+		switch (scale) {
+		case 1: arg->scale_bitshift = 0; break;
+		case 2: arg->scale_bitshift = 1; break;
+		case 4: arg->scale_bitshift = 2; break;
+		case 8: arg->scale_bitshift = 3; break;
+		default:
+			pr_warn("usdt: invalid SIB scale %d, expected 1, 2, 4, 8\n", scale);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	} else if (sscanf(arg_str, " %d @ %ld ( %%%15[^)] ) %n",
+				arg_sz, &off, reg_name, &len) == 3) {
 		/* Memory dereference case, e.g., -4@-20(%rbp) */
 		arg->arg_type = USDT_ARG_REG_DEREF;
 		arg->val_off = off;
@@ -1306,6 +1357,7 @@ static int parse_usdt_arg(const char *arg_str, int arg_num, struct usdt_arg_spec
 	} else if (sscanf(arg_str, " %d @ %%%15s %n", arg_sz, reg_name, &len) == 2) {
 		/* Register read case, e.g., -4@%eax */
 		arg->arg_type = USDT_ARG_REG;
+		/* register read has no memory offset */
 		arg->val_off = 0;
 
 		reg_off = calc_pt_regs_off(reg_name);
-- 
2.51.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-09 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20251009155752.773732-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2025-10-09 15:54 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.17-5.4] bpf: Don't use %pK through printk Sasha Levin
2025-10-09 15:54 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.17-6.1] bpftool: Fix -Wuninitialized-const-pointer warnings with clang >= 21 Sasha Levin
2025-10-09 15:54 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.17-6.12] bpf: Use tnums for JEQ/JNE is_branch_taken logic Sasha Levin
2025-10-09 15:54 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.17-6.16] selftests/bpf: Fix incorrect array size calculation Sasha Levin
2025-10-09 15:54 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.17-6.12] selftests/bpf: Fix selftest verifier_arena_large failure Sasha Levin
2025-10-09 15:55 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.17-6.1] bpf: Clear pfmemalloc flag when freeing all fragments Sasha Levin
2025-10-09 15:55 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.17-5.4] selftests/bpf: Fix bpf_prog_detach2 usage in test_lirc_mode2 Sasha Levin
2025-10-09 15:55 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.17-6.12] selftests/bpf: Fix flaky bpf_cookie selftest Sasha Levin
2025-10-09 15:55 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.17] selftests: drv-net: Pull data before parsing headers Sasha Levin
2025-10-09 15:55 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-10-09 15:55 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.17-6.12] bpftool: Add CET-aware symbol matching for x86_64 architectures Sasha Levin
2025-10-09 15:55 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.17-6.6] bpf: Do not limit bpf_cgroup_from_id to current's namespace Sasha Levin
2025-10-09 15:55 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.17-6.1] selftests/bpf: Upon failures, exit with code 1 in test_xsk.sh Sasha Levin
2025-10-09 15:55 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.17-6.16] selftests/bpf: Fix arena_spin_lock selftest failure Sasha Levin
2025-10-09 15:56 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.17-6.6] riscv: bpf: Fix uninitialized symbol 'retval_off' Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251009155752.773732-61-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=phoenix500526@163.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox