From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
Cc: kernel-ci@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
martin.lau@linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] net: Introduce struct sockaddr_unspec
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 16:56:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202510141649.D0DDA6A57@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2095031a79fdd5a7765b9e7a0a052fb2b48895c8794a170e567273d2614da9fd@mail.kernel.org>
On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 11:06:58PM +0000, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
> Dear patch submitter,
>
> CI has tested the following submission:
> Status: FAILURE
> Name: [v2,00/10] net: Introduce struct sockaddr_unspec
> Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1011557&state=*
> Matrix: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/18512305054
Hrm, there's something in here that wasn't caught with my "allmodconfig"
tests. I'll take a closer look...
Ah, yes. I missed these:
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_addr.c:static int kernel_bind(int fd, struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t addrlen)
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_addr.c: if (kernel_bind(0, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, addrlen) < 0)
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c: err = kernel_bind(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&args->addr, args->addrlen);
etc...
I will get those fixed.
--
Kees Cook
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-14 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-14 22:43 [PATCH v2 00/10] net: Introduce struct sockaddr_unspec Kees Cook
2025-10-14 22:43 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] net: Add struct sockaddr_unspec for sockaddr of unknown length Kees Cook
2025-10-14 22:43 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] net/l2tp: Add missing sa_family validation in pppol2tp_sockaddr_get_info Kees Cook
2025-10-14 22:43 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] net: Convert proto_ops bind() callbacks to use sockaddr_unspec Kees Cook
2025-10-15 12:15 ` Simon Horman
2025-10-20 18:12 ` Kees Cook
2025-10-14 22:43 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] net: Convert proto_ops connect() " Kees Cook
2025-10-14 22:43 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] net: Remove struct sockaddr from net.h Kees Cook
2025-10-14 22:43 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] net: Convert proto callbacks from sockaddr to sockaddr_unspec Kees Cook
2025-10-14 22:43 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] bpf: Convert cgroup sockaddr filters to use sockaddr_unspec consistently Kees Cook
2025-10-14 22:43 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] bpf: Convert bpf_sock_addr_kern "uaddr" to sockaddr_unspec Kees Cook
2025-10-14 22:43 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] bpf: Add size validation to bpf_sock_addr_set_sun_path() Kees Cook
2025-10-14 22:43 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] net: Convert struct sockaddr to fixed-size "sa_data[14]" Kees Cook
[not found] ` <2095031a79fdd5a7765b9e7a0a052fb2b48895c8794a170e567273d2614da9fd@mail.kernel.org>
2025-10-14 23:56 ` Kees Cook [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202510141649.D0DDA6A57@keescook \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-ci@meta.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox