BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	martin.lau@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: consistently use bpf_rcu_lock_held() everywhere
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 13:14:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251014201403.4104511-1-andrii@kernel.org> (raw)

We have many places which open-code what's now is bpf_rcu_lock_held()
macro, so replace all those places with a clean and short macro invocation.
For that, move bpf_rcu_lock_held() macro into include/linux/bpf.h.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
v1->v2:
  - move bpf_rcu_lock_held() outside of #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL area (kernel
    test robot).

 include/linux/bpf.h               |  3 +++
 include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h |  3 ---
 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c              | 21 +++++++--------------
 kernel/bpf/helpers.c              | 12 ++++--------
 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index f87fb203aaae..86afd9ac6848 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2381,6 +2381,9 @@ bpf_prog_run_array_uprobe(const struct bpf_prog_array *array,
 bool bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v1(void);
 bool bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v4(void);
 
+#define bpf_rcu_lock_held() \
+	(rcu_read_lock_held() || rcu_read_lock_trace_held() || rcu_read_lock_bh_held())
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_prog_active);
 extern struct mutex bpf_stats_enabled_mutex;
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
index ab7244d8108f..782f58feea35 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
@@ -18,9 +18,6 @@
 
 #define BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_CACHE_SIZE	16
 
-#define bpf_rcu_lock_held()                                                    \
-	(rcu_read_lock_held() || rcu_read_lock_trace_held() ||                 \
-	 rcu_read_lock_bh_held())
 struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket {
 	struct hlist_head list;
 	raw_spinlock_t lock;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
index e7a6ba04dc82..f876f09355f0 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
@@ -657,8 +657,7 @@ static void *__htab_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
 	struct htab_elem *l;
 	u32 hash, key_size;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
-		     !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
 
 	key_size = map->key_size;
 
@@ -1086,8 +1085,7 @@ static long htab_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
 		/* unknown flags */
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
-		     !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
 
 	key_size = map->key_size;
 
@@ -1194,8 +1192,7 @@ static long htab_lru_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value
 		/* unknown flags */
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
-		     !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
 
 	key_size = map->key_size;
 
@@ -1263,8 +1260,7 @@ static long htab_map_update_elem_in_place(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 		/* unknown flags */
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
-		     !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
 
 	key_size = map->key_size;
 
@@ -1326,8 +1322,7 @@ static long __htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 		/* unknown flags */
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
-		     !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
 
 	key_size = map->key_size;
 
@@ -1404,8 +1399,7 @@ static long htab_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
 	u32 hash, key_size;
 	int ret;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
-		     !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
 
 	key_size = map->key_size;
 
@@ -1440,8 +1434,7 @@ static long htab_lru_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
 	u32 hash, key_size;
 	int ret;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
-		     !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
 
 	key_size = map->key_size;
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index dea8443f782c..825280c953be 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -42,8 +42,7 @@
  */
 BPF_CALL_2(bpf_map_lookup_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key)
 {
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
-		     !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
 	return (unsigned long) map->ops->map_lookup_elem(map, key);
 }
 
@@ -59,8 +58,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto = {
 BPF_CALL_4(bpf_map_update_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key,
 	   void *, value, u64, flags)
 {
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
-		     !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
 	return map->ops->map_update_elem(map, key, value, flags);
 }
 
@@ -77,8 +75,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_update_elem_proto = {
 
 BPF_CALL_2(bpf_map_delete_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key)
 {
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
-		     !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
 	return map->ops->map_delete_elem(map, key);
 }
 
@@ -134,8 +131,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_peek_elem_proto = {
 
 BPF_CALL_3(bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key, u32, cpu)
 {
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
-		     !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
 	return (unsigned long) map->ops->map_lookup_percpu_elem(map, key, cpu);
 }
 
-- 
2.47.3


             reply	other threads:[~2025-10-14 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-14 20:14 Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2025-10-15  9:27 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: consistently use bpf_rcu_lock_held() everywhere Jiri Olsa
2025-10-15 10:31 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251014201403.4104511-1-andrii@kernel.org \
    --to=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox