From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F70335CBB2; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 22:22:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762986134; cv=none; b=dk3WF3HmGw/871SKYyYS3QXMAUS6sHfLQIJgrDpIs0us7eaj8NVj0r05mk9aSTJAi9m0wym6h0lcxy8AmeRPA5jFDkJRrgtwA23SjAks28Ey9YkAl+LMeG6nlnkzGKxJi32g3S+FjD+tFV+/14SBedsSfAKyEbB55EWiy5Yrw/M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762986134; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Xnq1zlhUzQlq4w7pNhD9+285Oip5KNSnZLZFH1CTK7A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=Exs3JmWVEHsgtdahoJHTkY+HW/0ToqIhIxty2vepBJqQTWMyfp2MBV3sw2laUH5nagGj7DvLwHJxSmFVjv6aA3PDlR9e6huaj3P1vr3iKNyQiK6VoxVTkdOt+i3uBk0P4BjJqV2KtmtmLvwp+fvPHF3FYB810dBxiGf7eMDz3O4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b=scZ7fIIA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b="scZ7fIIA" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3D1FC4CEF1; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 22:22:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1762986134; bh=Xnq1zlhUzQlq4w7pNhD9+285Oip5KNSnZLZFH1CTK7A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=scZ7fIIAjmpG3n3F9Q5lLUk8HbQXHeXjOTMhm7EB1qihhQhQZ2psy2l53qUs1yeeC HmsQQGjCw9+09migWcXEzPLTShaS2/ATeGIkPJFwZSUpg6VbeZhvlYhb9lD0wbSDE7 G5c1uJGoMLmLbPNsWkAs5qP8EX7OvZJ5nxzjk9rQ= Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 14:22:13 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Uladzislau Rezki , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] make vmalloc gfp flags usage more apparent Message-Id: <20251112142213.bc01a3abe37de98f9d40e392@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20251112185834.32487-1-vishal.moola@gmail.com> References: <20251112185834.32487-1-vishal.moola@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 10:58:29 -0800 "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" wrote: > v2: > - Add __GFP_HARDWALL[3] for bpf and drm users. > - cc BPF mailing list v1->v2 diff: --- a/mm/vmalloc.c~b +++ a/mm/vmalloc.c @@ -3922,10 +3922,12 @@ fail: /* * See __vmalloc_node_range() for a clear list of supported vmalloc flags. * This gfp lists all flags currently passed through vmalloc. Currently, - * __GFP_ZERO is used by BFP and __GFP_NORETRY is used by percpu. + * __GFP_ZERO is used by BPF and __GFP_NORETRY is used by percpu. Both drm + * and BPF also use GFP_USER, which is GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_HARDWALL. */ #define GFP_VMALLOC_SUPPORTED (GFP_KERNEL | GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_NOWAIT |\ - __GFP_NOFAIL | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_NORETRY) + __GFP_NOFAIL | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_NORETRY |\ + __GFP_HARDWALL) static gfp_t vmalloc_fix_flags(gfp_t flags) { _