BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: 'Alexei Starovoitov ' <ast@kernel.org>,
	'Andrii Nakryiko ' <andrii@kernel.org>,
	'Daniel Borkmann ' <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_skb_check_mtu(BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS) when transport_header is not set
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 15:23:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251112232331.1566074-2-martin.lau@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251112232331.1566074-1-martin.lau@linux.dev>

From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

Add a test to check that bpf_skb_check_mtu(BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS) is
rejected (-EINVAL) if skb->transport_header is not set. The test
needs to lower the MTU of the loopback device. Thus, take this
opportunity to run the test in a netns by adding "ns_" to the test
name. The "serial_" prefix can then be removed.

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c      | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c      | 12 ++++++++++
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c
index 2a9a30650350..65b4512967e7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c
@@ -153,6 +153,26 @@ static void test_check_mtu_run_tc(struct test_check_mtu *skel,
 	ASSERT_EQ(mtu_result, mtu_expect, "MTU-compare-user");
 }
 
+static void test_chk_segs_flag(struct test_check_mtu *skel, __u32 mtu)
+{
+	int err, prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.tc_chk_segs_flag);
+	struct __sk_buff skb = {
+		.gso_size = 10,
+	};
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
+		    .data_in = &pkt_v4,
+		    .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
+		    .ctx_in = &skb,
+		    .ctx_size_in = sizeof(skb),
+	);
+
+	/* Lower the mtu to test the BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS */
+	SYS_NOFAIL("ip link set dev lo mtu 10");
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+	SYS_NOFAIL("ip link set dev lo mtu %u", mtu);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
+	ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, BPF_OK, "retval");
+}
 
 static void test_check_mtu_tc(__u32 mtu, __u32 ifindex)
 {
@@ -177,11 +197,12 @@ static void test_check_mtu_tc(__u32 mtu, __u32 ifindex)
 	test_check_mtu_run_tc(skel, skel->progs.tc_minus_delta, mtu);
 	test_check_mtu_run_tc(skel, skel->progs.tc_input_len, mtu);
 	test_check_mtu_run_tc(skel, skel->progs.tc_input_len_exceed, mtu);
+	test_chk_segs_flag(skel, mtu);
 cleanup:
 	test_check_mtu__destroy(skel);
 }
 
-void serial_test_check_mtu(void)
+void test_ns_check_mtu(void)
 {
 	int mtu_lo;
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c
index 2ec1de11a3ae..7b6b2b342c1d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 
 #include <stddef.h>
 #include <stdint.h>
+#include <errno.h>
 
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
 
@@ -288,3 +289,14 @@ int tc_input_len_exceed(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 	global_bpf_mtu_xdp = mtu_len;
 	return retval;
 }
+
+SEC("tc")
+int tc_chk_segs_flag(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+	__u32 mtu_len = 0;
+	int err;
+
+	err = bpf_check_mtu(ctx, GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX, &mtu_len, 0, BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS);
+
+	return err == -EINVAL ? BPF_OK : BPF_DROP;
+}
-- 
2.47.3


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-12 23:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-12 23:23 [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Check skb->transport_header is set in bpf_skb_check_mtu Martin KaFai Lau
2025-11-12 23:23 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2025-11-15  2:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251112232331.1566074-2-martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox