[PATCH RFC bpf-next 3/7] bpf: fix the usage of BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME

[Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>]

Some places calculate the origin_call by checking if
BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME is set. However, it should use
BPF_TRAMP_F_ORIG_STACK for this propose. Just fix them.

Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
---
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 2 +-
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c     | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 45cbc7c6fe49..21c70ae3296b 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -1131,7 +1131,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 	store_args(nr_arg_slots, args_off, ctx);
 
 	/* skip to actual body of traced function */
-	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME)
+	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_ORIG_STACK)
 		orig_call += RV_FENTRY_NINSNS * 4;
 
 	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index de5083cb1d37..2d300ab37cdd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -3272,7 +3272,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *rw_im
 
 	arg_stack_off = stack_size;
 
-	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME) {
+	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
 		/* skip patched call instruction and point orig_call to actual
 		 * body of the kernel function.
 		 */
-- 
2.51.2