From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>,
Pavan Chebbi <pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>, David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk>,
Haiyue Wang <haiyuewa@163.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Vishwanath Seshagiri <vishs@fb.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, dtatulea@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 7/9] eth: bnxt: allow providers to set rx buf size
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 10:58:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251202105820.14d6de99@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <95566e5d1b75abcaefe3dca9a52015c2b5f04933.1764542851.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
On Sun, 30 Nov 2025 23:35:22 +0000 Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> +static ssize_t bnxt_get_rx_buf_size(struct bnxt *bp, int rxq_idx)
> +{
> + struct netdev_rx_queue *rxq = __netif_get_rx_queue(bp->dev, rxq_idx);
> + size_t rx_buf_size;
> +
> + rx_buf_size = rxq->mp_params.rx_buf_len;
> + if (!rx_buf_size)
> + return BNXT_RX_PAGE_SIZE;
I'd like to retain my cfg objects in the queue API, if you don't mind.
I guess we just need the way for drivers to fill in the defaults and
then plumb them into the ops.
When drivers implement the logic to consolidate the configuration from
different APIs into the effective one they inevitably diverge in their
interpretations :/ We should keep it in the core from the start and
present to the driver the final queue config.
> + /* Older chips need MSS calc so rx_buf_len is not supported,
> + * but we don't set queue ops for them so we should never get here.
> + */
> + if (!(bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_CHIP_P5_PLUS))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!is_power_of_2(rx_buf_size))
> + return -ERANGE;
> +
> + if (rx_buf_size < BNXT_RX_PAGE_SIZE ||
> + rx_buf_size > BNXT_MAX_RX_PAGE_SIZE)
> + return -ERANGE;
> +
> + return rx_buf_size;
> +}
> +
> static int bnxt_queue_mem_alloc(struct net_device *dev, void *qmem, int idx)
> {
> struct bnxt_rx_ring_info *rxr, *clone;
> struct bnxt *bp = netdev_priv(dev);
> struct bnxt_ring_struct *ring;
> + ssize_t rx_buf_size;
> int rc;
>
> if (!bp->rx_ring)
> return -ENETDOWN;
>
> + rx_buf_size = bnxt_get_rx_buf_size(bp, idx);
> + if (rx_buf_size < 0)
> + return rx_buf_size;
Does this survive full ring reconfig? IIRC the large changes to the NIC
config (like changing ring sizes) free and reallocate all rings in bnxt,
but due to "historic reasons?" they don't go thru the queue ops.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-02 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-30 23:35 [PATCH net-next v7 0/9] Add support for providers with large rx buffer Pavel Begunkov
2025-11-30 23:35 ` [PATCH net-next v7 1/9] net: page pool: xa init with destroy on pp init Pavel Begunkov
2025-11-30 23:35 ` [PATCH net-next v7 2/9] net: page_pool: sanitise allocation order Pavel Begunkov
2025-11-30 23:35 ` [PATCH net-next v7 3/9] net: memzero mp params when closing a queue Pavel Begunkov
2025-11-30 23:35 ` [PATCH net-next v7 4/9] net: let pp memory provider to specify rx buf len Pavel Begunkov
2025-12-02 19:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-12-11 1:31 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-12-12 23:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-30 23:35 ` [PATCH net-next v7 5/9] eth: bnxt: store rx buffer size per queue Pavel Begunkov
2025-11-30 23:35 ` [PATCH net-next v7 6/9] eth: bnxt: adjust the fill level of agg queues with larger buffers Pavel Begunkov
2025-11-30 23:35 ` [PATCH net-next v7 7/9] eth: bnxt: allow providers to set rx buf size Pavel Begunkov
2025-12-02 18:58 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-12-11 1:39 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-12-13 0:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-30 23:35 ` [PATCH net-next v7 8/9] io_uring/zcrx: document area chunking parameter Pavel Begunkov
2025-11-30 23:35 ` [PATCH net-next v7 9/9] selftests: iou-zcrx: test large chunk sizes Pavel Begunkov
2025-12-02 14:44 ` [PATCH net-next v7 0/9] Add support for providers with large rx buffer Paolo Abeni
2025-12-02 15:36 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-12-02 19:05 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-12-02 19:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251202105820.14d6de99@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haiyuewa@163.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vishs@fb.com \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).