From: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@oracle.com>,
"Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@gnu.org>,
Beau Belgrave <beaub@linux.microsoft.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
"Carlos O'Donell" <codonell@redhat.com>,
Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>, Dylan Hatch <dylanbhatch@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 03/17] x86/unwind_user: Guard unwind_user_word_size() by UNWIND_USER
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 18:15:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251208171559.2029709-4-jremus@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251208171559.2029709-1-jremus@linux.ibm.com>
The unwind user framework in general requires an architecture-specific
implementation of unwind_user_word_size() to be present for any unwind
method, whether that is fp or a future other method, such as potentially
sframe.
Guard unwind_user_word_size() by the availability of the UNWIND_USER
framework instead of the specific HAVE_UNWIND_USER_FP method.
This facilitates to selectively disable HAVE_UNWIND_USER_FP on x86
(e.g. for test purposes) once a new unwind method is added to unwind
user.
Signed-off-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h
index a528eee80dd6..4d699e4954ed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h
@@ -2,11 +2,27 @@
#ifndef _ASM_X86_UNWIND_USER_H
#define _ASM_X86_UNWIND_USER_H
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_UNWIND_USER_FP
+#ifdef CONFIG_UNWIND_USER
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
#include <asm/uprobes.h>
+static inline int unwind_user_word_size(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ /* We can't unwind VM86 stacks */
+ if (regs->flags & X86_VM_MASK)
+ return 0;
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ if (!user_64bit_mode(regs))
+ return sizeof(int);
+#endif
+ return sizeof(long);
+}
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_UNWIND_USER */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_UNWIND_USER_FP
+
#define ARCH_INIT_USER_FP_FRAME(ws) \
.cfa_off = 2*(ws), \
.ra_off = -1*(ws), \
@@ -21,18 +37,6 @@
.use_fp = false, \
.outermost = false,
-static inline int unwind_user_word_size(struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- /* We can't unwind VM86 stacks */
- if (regs->flags & X86_VM_MASK)
- return 0;
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- if (!user_64bit_mode(regs))
- return sizeof(int);
-#endif
- return sizeof(long);
-}
-
static inline bool unwind_user_at_function_start(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
return is_uprobe_at_func_entry(regs);
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-08 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-08 17:15 [RFC PATCH v3 00/17] s390: SFrame user space unwinding Jens Remus
2025-12-08 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/17] unwind_user: Enhance comments on get CFA, FP, and RA Jens Remus
2025-12-08 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/17] unwind_user/fp: Use dummies instead of ifdef Jens Remus
2025-12-08 17:15 ` Jens Remus [this message]
2025-12-08 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/17] x86/unwind_user: Simplify unwind_user_word_size() Jens Remus
2025-12-08 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/17] s390: asm/dwarf.h should only be included in assembly files Jens Remus
2025-12-10 15:16 ` Heiko Carstens
2025-12-11 9:43 ` Jens Remus
2025-12-08 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/17] s390/vdso: Avoid emitting DWARF CFI for non-vDSO Jens Remus
2025-12-08 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/17] s390/vdso: Keep function symbols in vDSO Jens Remus
2025-12-08 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/17] s390/vdso: Enable SFrame generation " Jens Remus
2025-12-08 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/17] unwind_user: Enable archs that define CFA = SP_callsite + offset Jens Remus
2025-12-08 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/17] unwind_user: Enable archs that pass RA in a register Jens Remus
2025-12-08 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/17] unwind_user: Enable archs that save RA/FP in other registers Jens Remus
2025-12-08 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/17] unwind_user/sframe: Enable archs with encoded SFrame CFA offsets Jens Remus
2025-12-08 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/17] s390/ptrace: Provide frame_pointer() Jens Remus
2025-12-10 15:19 ` Heiko Carstens
2025-12-08 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/17] s390/unwind_user/sframe: Enable HAVE_UNWIND_USER_SFRAME Jens Remus
2025-12-10 15:10 ` Heiko Carstens
2025-12-12 8:13 ` Jens Remus
2025-12-08 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/17] unwind_user: Introduce FP/RA location unknown Jens Remus
2025-12-08 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/17] unwind_user/fp: Use arch-specific helper to initialize FP frame Jens Remus
2025-12-08 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH v3 17/17] s390/unwind_user/fp: Enable back chain unwinding of user space Jens Remus
2025-12-12 9:21 ` Jens Remus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251208171559.2029709-4-jremus@linux.ibm.com \
--to=jremus@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=beaub@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=codonell@redhat.com \
--cc=dylanbhatch@google.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=indu.bhagat@oracle.com \
--cc=jemarch@gnu.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@kernel.org \
--cc=sam@gentoo.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).