From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 110822BAF4; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765379828; cv=none; b=U3+FmnSsbJqz3infXe3mUZjW0cw34Xzv/EOe7y2a6zW5SbKNBZ3vL/Y5+N0nXjVX5Cyr+WEH4vwwtvlzaaHH97lBfQf6tTNu7lRtSARAHh+xmJipFgEFwJyREEEcd5L9Qjc8bOAkXOrdkRkq1TCQ2uQf1WQ4UtTOSW50HkvYw2Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765379828; c=relaxed/simple; bh=StNPX8edmutLaT5NZTi8Panl8ODVbfBBuuPD6j/b/GQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GSBYtRdFsMDCS4E92uPsXkFmmfEu3eyWkmzKoWEbkeiakJF9e6pdJl8U1e3l7dQ3P1Uq2Bt3hD0DeocVAtU3mToiPfiaRnLuieAlurW2ZsWeBP8qfoyL1fSnQdGiAc3O1l1NHQsQc3yWXuG9NnTTrkfODD39tEwFhneJiwXotqw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=cvLXkc72; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="cvLXkc72" Received: from pps.filterd (m0360083.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 5BAE4kR3000613; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:16:46 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=nLGqRfkuXy5fTNpu5pbnPbSlDfSmWm Ow58TN41H+4k4=; b=cvLXkc72bhbx/BSUOzkVrvtooTbVR3rsEzjF3OR+4vXTQy tVv/Vn0K6Q7AeZKaZeVX6aMt9YRL3uT2tSqVmLm5MlF/Hh0o54hculZltdvivzmF udAWy82WTdkYwtR0Y5Gqx2UgWTvIrqpWKoyFxM5WlZKGuPceirEud8EIbeXaB7yo EpxkCkpwrUvNy1okSmIXRFzZpRbRc2/zce3OAJgOmRG12m6yw20nQ5FW+Bej0k/i J6tN3/rC2aSk0qfCv5IYnsEhYeY7UHzQKJZU9NNJE3DAHHgpfS9WrdtipTI8rGFk jBQCiy3AlLGF4v7wlB0/MwDnbY8EId3suf0fcc8g== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4avc0k32dj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:16:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0360083.ppops.net (m0360083.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.1.12/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 5BAF4VeV009838; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:16:45 GMT Received: from ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5c.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.92]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4avc0k32da-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:16:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 5BADPaU2028123; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:16:43 GMT Received: from smtprelay03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.224]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4avy6y1cdn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:16:43 +0000 Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.102]) by smtprelay03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 5BAFGdHQ36635026 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:16:39 GMT Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6CA20043; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:16:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2EF20040; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:16:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.111.15.174]) by smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:16:37 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 16:16:36 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens To: Jens Remus Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Steven Rostedt , Vasily Gorbik , Ilya Leoshkevich , Josh Poimboeuf , Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Namhyung Kim , Thomas Gleixner , Andrii Nakryiko , Indu Bhagat , "Jose E. Marchesi" , Beau Belgrave , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Florian Weimer , Kees Cook , "Carlos O'Donell" , Sam James , Dylan Hatch Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 05/17] s390: asm/dwarf.h should only be included in assembly files Message-ID: <20251210151636.40732C96-hca@linux.ibm.com> References: <20251208171559.2029709-1-jremus@linux.ibm.com> <20251208171559.2029709-6-jremus@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251208171559.2029709-6-jremus@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=Cf8FJbrl c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=69398ede cx=c_pps a=5BHTudwdYE3Te8bg5FgnPg==:117 a=5BHTudwdYE3Te8bg5FgnPg==:17 a=62EC5onNXgn9lpaB:21 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=wP3pNCr1ah4A:10 a=VkNPw1HP01LnGYTKEx00:22 a=VnNF1IyMAAAA:8 a=jgzeNuNnndWrP1aWhNsA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: IzMGYfQcab_wGRB3kfvVhm8a1JSw9nq4 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjUxMjA2MDAxNiBTYWx0ZWRfXz7a0VpZ+qZ6r HGMAJpaZScuifm9deX34oqY/AjankVzvy4F7kLKQV5ivP6gZvMBV96jvBfbqr0a9Ckz+28KSTOF n819AOQryx9JM/4lE6AC0txmmSKtHvItP4cbhFwV6w+kiDHoIHvGGE1oTkKEnzp3y/vxcTVw58l 793v3Fq4DuaopBRkt5KJVEdNgiCjuKYkzJUixfnJHG2zGHxe0uRNxtLb3QooMZ+ePs2psEPjAfZ dO8lmjrOK9Pa2xk+RlVQzBa6QHmfk2LYkA2ji9SivTXv7ytq8SpSKDvRivpovh8M8P+jRN7a8bn nvK/A9jd08MxRmvc3/MZTEZW3Wyq44rbVwMWpmNMaRTmmRvOcV0tTKdUh6+hLcfxjlkQsxAkZAU 7WRa9qmsY8n3i9gTPSLrQLM26sMCgA== X-Proofpoint-GUID: VXt6i1_e8pTA6HDA6kBjlxF1tGWRYeFn X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1121,Hydra:6.1.9,FMLib:17.12.100.49 definitions=2025-12-10_01,2025-12-09_03,2025-10-01_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1011 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2510240000 definitions=main-2512060016 On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 06:15:47PM +0100, Jens Remus wrote: > Align to x86 and add a compile-time check that asm/dwarf.h is only > included in pure assembly files. > > Signed-off-by: Jens Remus > --- > > Notes (jremus): > Changes in RFC v2: > - Adjust to upstream change of __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__. > > arch/s390/include/asm/dwarf.h | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Is there a reason why this and the next two patches couldn't go upstream already now? It looks like they improve things in any case. No dependency to the sframe work.