From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>,
Pavan Chebbi <pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>, David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk>,
Haiyue Wang <haiyuewa@163.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Vishwanath Seshagiri <vishs@fb.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, dtatulea@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 7/9] eth: bnxt: allow providers to set rx buf size
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2025 09:04:07 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251213090407.3de8dd86@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c97d2c95-31c5-4bf6-b58f-552e85314056@gmail.com>
On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 01:39:25 +0000 Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 12/2/25 18:58, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Nov 2025 23:35:22 +0000 Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> >> +static ssize_t bnxt_get_rx_buf_size(struct bnxt *bp, int rxq_idx)
> >> +{
> >> + struct netdev_rx_queue *rxq = __netif_get_rx_queue(bp->dev, rxq_idx);
> >> + size_t rx_buf_size;
> >> +
> >> + rx_buf_size = rxq->mp_params.rx_buf_len;
> >> + if (!rx_buf_size)
> >> + return BNXT_RX_PAGE_SIZE;
> >
> > I'd like to retain my cfg objects in the queue API, if you don't mind.
> > I guess we just need the way for drivers to fill in the defaults and
> > then plumb them into the ops.
>
> It was problematic, I wanted to split it into more digestible chunks.
> My main problem is that it was not really optional and could break
> drivers that don't even care about this qcfg len option but allow
> setting it device-wise via ethtool, and I won't even have a way to
> test them.
>
> Maybe there is a way to strip down qcfg and only apply it to marked
> queue api enabled drivers for now, and then extend the idea it in
> the future. E.g.
Yes, I mean a stripped down version, since we're not shadowing the
ethtool knob any more the full set of changes I had will be too much.
Off the top of my head I think we'd need to retain:
- the qcfg struct passed as an argument to the queue callbacks
(drivers other than bnxt won't use it which is okay since they don't
set .supported_params)
- the ability to conjure the qcfg struct for any given queue by the
driver at any time (netdev_queue_config())
- probably the callback to fill in the defaults so that the driver
doesn't have to check "is the value set by the user" explicitly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-13 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-30 23:35 [PATCH net-next v7 0/9] Add support for providers with large rx buffer Pavel Begunkov
2025-11-30 23:35 ` [PATCH net-next v7 1/9] net: page pool: xa init with destroy on pp init Pavel Begunkov
2025-11-30 23:35 ` [PATCH net-next v7 2/9] net: page_pool: sanitise allocation order Pavel Begunkov
2025-11-30 23:35 ` [PATCH net-next v7 3/9] net: memzero mp params when closing a queue Pavel Begunkov
2025-11-30 23:35 ` [PATCH net-next v7 4/9] net: let pp memory provider to specify rx buf len Pavel Begunkov
2025-12-02 19:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-12-11 1:31 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-12-12 23:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-30 23:35 ` [PATCH net-next v7 5/9] eth: bnxt: store rx buffer size per queue Pavel Begunkov
2025-11-30 23:35 ` [PATCH net-next v7 6/9] eth: bnxt: adjust the fill level of agg queues with larger buffers Pavel Begunkov
2025-11-30 23:35 ` [PATCH net-next v7 7/9] eth: bnxt: allow providers to set rx buf size Pavel Begunkov
2025-12-02 18:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-12-11 1:39 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-12-13 0:04 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-11-30 23:35 ` [PATCH net-next v7 8/9] io_uring/zcrx: document area chunking parameter Pavel Begunkov
2025-11-30 23:35 ` [PATCH net-next v7 9/9] selftests: iou-zcrx: test large chunk sizes Pavel Begunkov
2025-12-02 14:44 ` [PATCH net-next v7 0/9] Add support for providers with large rx buffer Paolo Abeni
2025-12-02 15:36 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-12-02 19:05 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-12-02 19:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251213090407.3de8dd86@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haiyuewa@163.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vishs@fb.com \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).