From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Yazhou Tang <yazhoutang@foxmail.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org,
sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
tangyazhou518@outlook.com, shenghaoyuan0928@163.com,
ziye@zju.edu.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Add interval and tnum analysis for signed and unsigned BPF_DIV
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:00:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202512230626.fsj1GsdX-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_7C98FAECA40C98489ACF4515CE346F031509@qq.com>
Hi Yazhou,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yazhou-Tang/selftests-bpf-Add-tests-for-BPF_DIV-analysis/20251221-174300
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/tencent_7C98FAECA40C98489ACF4515CE346F031509%40qq.com
patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Add interval and tnum analysis for signed and unsigned BPF_DIV
config: i386-randconfig-061-20251222 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251223/202512230626.fsj1GsdX-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251223/202512230626.fsj1GsdX-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512230626.fsj1GsdX-lkp@intel.com/
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> kernel/bpf/tnum.c:16:19: sparse: sparse: symbol 'tnum_bottom' was not declared. Should it be static?
--
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:23659:38: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
>> kernel/bpf/verifier.c:15184:42: sparse: sparse: unsigned value that used to be signed checked against zero?
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:15181:24: sparse: signed value source
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:15191:32: sparse: sparse: unsigned value that used to be signed checked against zero?
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:15180:24: sparse: signed value source
kernel/bpf/verifier.c: note: in included file (through include/linux/bpf.h, include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h):
include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: sparse: sparse: cast to non-scalar
include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: sparse: sparse: cast from non-scalar
include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: sparse: sparse: cast to non-scalar
include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: sparse: sparse: cast from non-scalar
include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: sparse: sparse: cast to non-scalar
include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: sparse: sparse: cast from non-scalar
include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: sparse: sparse: cast to non-scalar
include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: sparse: sparse: cast from non-scalar
vim +/tnum_bottom +16 kernel/bpf/tnum.c
11
12 #define TNUM(_v, _m) (struct tnum){.value = _v, .mask = _m}
13 /* A completely unknown value */
14 const struct tnum tnum_unknown = { .value = 0, .mask = -1 };
15 /* Tnum bottom */
> 16 const struct tnum tnum_bottom = { .value = -1, .mask = -1 };
17
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-22 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20251221093955.109312-1-yazhoutang@foxmail.com>
2025-12-21 9:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Add interval and tnum analysis for signed and unsigned BPF_DIV Yazhou Tang
2025-12-21 10:07 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-12-22 23:00 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-12-23 0:19 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-23 20:14 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-21 9:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add tests for BPF_DIV analysis Yazhou Tang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202512230626.fsj1GsdX-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shenghaoyuan0928@163.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tangyazhou518@outlook.com \
--cc=yazhoutang@foxmail.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=ziye@zju.edu.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox