From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BBDB287268 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2025 10:20:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766571620; cv=none; b=NzI815uSdzB6LiFiNFBAb0/lmAB5++kZrO27OEME0f4cy2TwFComOwJLhkPDckHS5aWj5wSDcveIRMCM2EIQprhlBH/1xTCP5wsOLXaJPyUsbwAO6jTZAFKSmxWbJu2YwbV3OGwhtwbl+yfPbPHb0xaXQpSfj3h9Wc9oSVgzkN0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766571620; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oYrwPO86ZCxudCbsRZuqfzHLWeJAOAoyrphKxk8LHjc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=NnR8zuU0LO9HTRCDQB6eL9OfoYPmuhN06IYUyIKBR+SRc7WyUKNZdZ+FZV+XwC1Z2CFPpqDB3kpm4LUu3eopjoi8EiMTmU/pXrJoeF3htgKfW12Bau5+Yd7vaRY+bBqgXb/a43fXQQeirLt+riPcx4ACch6vOjFsEflCS0V+c/I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=eR4Lb9j+; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=p8gIe8Fk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="eR4Lb9j+"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="p8gIe8Fk" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1766571618; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6O2EtwV8zLDpt91a2UuKYvEZqcHN8Sgzg6sMdCfF3b8=; b=eR4Lb9j+gs3NeiHv8lbAwcKiEBClAeHhnRNWx+bp9AmesBUqcGR/KUbxCMZNwC+JooT6Xh g6rLQksCedxdU3DhdzNHMfAZIj8A00tdI2e8aliOwJLOwzS1dIL2EruTT81FAmpZmv49uW sVHiarvldyaD3Spy54z3hvzefjhcxjQ= Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-580-uXc8k9I1NoyIetdYwqbSiw-1; Wed, 24 Dec 2025 05:20:14 -0500 X-MC-Unique: uXc8k9I1NoyIetdYwqbSiw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: uXc8k9I1NoyIetdYwqbSiw_1766571613 Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-4325ddc5babso1625527f8f.0 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2025 02:20:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=google; t=1766571613; x=1767176413; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6O2EtwV8zLDpt91a2UuKYvEZqcHN8Sgzg6sMdCfF3b8=; b=p8gIe8Fk542Na8IvMjt7FR9THEKInLYVKz7A2BKB+TLh0zlK3le6LT5nRblRxy3xYM NBGs8Gyz+3uGNYVeF6KN0SyZn1VpqTr1mNke9bvSopxGlOjlAotPEE7uCBz4PxSo+R9D uYFjrxGEpIbiqnqKTlIx+0HZ2AjI6lzTg9JaJZVtYxUQ7UEiq98yJi8Q/5U6PCYu0gwq n8k53XgfQmW5S2huII8+ZlesqsUc7BRZnUKv78Io1axlOw+xqsY1LgVQRhhpcqvC1RA8 66emyeZpaIC8qQiDglkB4cssI6IcSRDSLvAHi/b9qFmK8HKdBNb2hT+U+0JsReh3v/cy zvwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1766571613; x=1767176413; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6O2EtwV8zLDpt91a2UuKYvEZqcHN8Sgzg6sMdCfF3b8=; b=tDaCgY5+Clb1DneyWS08Ece6I0Kv+KSmgZzZ97jU1NP/BPUHgLFrJP492rlFwNEB66 E37kGleTBfoe675Ob3ihVjAW5gz7BsI2DWZg6Tr2xlB2veiqPSWjKRWmypZ+4bf5TyO7 2mjYIN8eYV1V+LTRqqpXSHOneOjehKrvhnEikLZVIIPUv85bvYjYoDq1I/dgdwjkg3vT 0kswHTPR8DZociOn1UVuVQjtihtzrgD73K6u+aBgMuY7ORdNHgcq6/qWLeY91DTIsotp NK7BR22KX8FeZAAK1SJOAi8HosXoYxjUBI4IMzHAO6Fu/kyQ9cSUYCW5iMZd3jtPqe07 doog== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVjcNoeNjI9DmFiFEcalGC2HFH+6oeI+dhmH3e6NDBuEdb3uOZPqOY5oUnfyPUh/QrAblE=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YySjFMSAKXLJz4d0QrjuArMP53PJe+HNwwlhpVJ76i50jabhsNB C1nrBwr+Zy4NNu6AX/CaI+0Uhlb4Yc9lZC281VJoUVHtLbkSVMJEgYaG6p9zgAJPk+cmkmBI6Fi Pig3r15u3YgZUi8ECcr0Z91a5QJe93YI6Ues47UnvEUlEytMkDXtn+Q== X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX4N0AprLyT4I9tJoFFXBQmwmAPpBoRcsAmqrxPCTfVG+emEob3mDoySQ/93A+2 yYse7LT5puaTJmgMRk0gRnJF7bgCWx7TYxa9/Xyq+GFu0jvIbL0k4ddU3D8aeGw34nwDO/xYF5B g+Mg3K1BGgjtkTDQaF58qZwXkk8ZCgOkgvqeu0Vyq+N8umzbKRZgF44p9qkAesM1rCrpbuS7Pgh IN/LlkfS9v7MtjpyIh6oWrYEcrl8HfC6G5K0muq76fIuA+hKf2lY7WQVx28NYKxKH6CFclZrprF dqvI29pbISaBbkb6dy3RKutOAUUuP7GPnMIc39HIKTQHgRf7Zb4yLnjf1qo29mS/hLdTvQ6xmzK t X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:350c:b0:477:7658:572a with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-47d19584900mr150239415e9.20.1766571613416; Wed, 24 Dec 2025 02:20:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGmKYK5ou+1W1Pze+hjbzHTs9SfZ3rn+HzocgNknKunmQm1zT8c7gWFoIrC37NzpjjUkVO+xA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:350c:b0:477:7658:572a with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-47d19584900mr150239105e9.20.1766571612873; Wed, 24 Dec 2025 02:20:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from redhat.com ([31.187.78.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-47be3a40a14sm146641555e9.2.2025.12.24.02.20.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Dec 2025 02:20:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 05:20:09 -0500 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Bui Quang Minh Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Wang , Xuan Zhuo , Eugenio =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9rez?= , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , Stanislav Fomichev , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/3] virtio-net: ensure rx NAPI is enabled before enabling refill work Message-ID: <20251224051936-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20251223152533.24364-1-minhquangbui99@gmail.com> <20251223152533.24364-3-minhquangbui99@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251223152533.24364-3-minhquangbui99@gmail.com> On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 10:25:32PM +0700, Bui Quang Minh wrote: > Calling napi_disable() on an already disabled napi can cause the > deadlock. a deadlock? > Because the delayed refill work will call napi_disable(), we > must ensure that refill work is only enabled and scheduled after we have > enabled the rx queue's NAPI. a bugfix so needs a Fixes tag. > > Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh > --- > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > index 63126e490bda..8016d2b378cf 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > @@ -3208,16 +3208,31 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev) > int i, err; > > for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) { > + bool schedule_refill = false; > + > + /* - We must call try_fill_recv before enabling napi of the same > + * receive queue so that it doesn't race with the call in > + * virtnet_receive. > + * - We must enable and schedule delayed refill work only when > + * we have enabled all the receive queue's napi. Otherwise, in > + * refill_work, we have a deadlock when calling napi_disable on > + * an already disabled napi. > + */ > if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs) { > - enable_delayed_refill(&vi->rq[i]); > /* Make sure we have some buffers: if oom use wq. */ > if (!try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL)) > - schedule_delayed_work(&vi->rq[i].refill, 0); > + schedule_refill = true; > } > > err = virtnet_enable_queue_pair(vi, i); > if (err < 0) > goto err_enable_qp; > + > + if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs) { > + enable_delayed_refill(&vi->rq[i]); > + if (schedule_refill) > + schedule_delayed_work(&vi->rq[i].refill, 0); > + } > } > > if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS)) { > @@ -3456,11 +3471,16 @@ static void __virtnet_rx_resume(struct virtnet_info *vi, > bool running = netif_running(vi->dev); > bool schedule_refill = false; > > + /* See the comment in virtnet_open for the ordering rule > + * of try_fill_recv, receive queue napi_enable and delayed > + * refill enable/schedule. > + */ > if (refill && !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL)) > schedule_refill = true; > if (running) > virtnet_napi_enable(rq); > > + enable_delayed_refill(rq); > if (schedule_refill) > schedule_delayed_work(&rq->refill, 0); > } > @@ -3470,18 +3490,15 @@ static void virtnet_rx_resume_all(struct virtnet_info *vi) > int i; > > for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) { > - if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs) { > - enable_delayed_refill(&vi->rq[i]); > + if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs) > __virtnet_rx_resume(vi, &vi->rq[i], true); > - } else { > + else > __virtnet_rx_resume(vi, &vi->rq[i], false); > - } > } > } > > static void virtnet_rx_resume(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq) > { > - enable_delayed_refill(rq); > __virtnet_rx_resume(vi, rq, true); > } > > -- > 2.43.0