BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] scripts/gen-btf.sh: Disable LTO when generating initial .o file
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 16:46:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260105234605.GB1276749@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff8187bd-0bae-4b49-8844-6c975a2e79c6@linux.dev>

On Mon, Jan 05, 2026 at 02:01:36PM -0800, Ihor Solodrai wrote:
> Hi Nathan, thank you for the patch.
> 
> I'm starting to think it wasn't a good idea to do
> 
> 	echo "" | ${CC} ...
> 
> here, given the number of associated bugs.

Yeah, I was wondering if a lack of KBUILD_CPPFLAGS would also be a
problem since that contains the endianness flag for some targets. I
cannot imagine any more issues than that but I can understand wanting to
back out of it.

> Before gen-btf.sh was introduced, the .btf.o binary was generated with this [1]:
> 
> 	${OBJCOPY} --only-section=.BTF --set-section-flags .BTF=alloc,readonly \
> 		--strip-all ${1} "${btf_data}" 2>/dev/null
> 
> I changed to ${CC} on the assumption it's a quicker operation than
> stripping entire vmlinux. But maybe it's not worth it and we should
> change back to --strip-all? wdyt?

That certainly seems more robust to me. I see the logic but with
'--only-section' and no glob, I would expect that to be a rather quick
operation but I am running out of time today to test and benchmark such
a change. I will try to do it tomorrow unless someone beats me to it.

Cheers,
Nathan

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-05 23:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-05 21:12 [PATCH bpf-next] scripts/gen-btf.sh: Disable LTO when generating initial .o file Nathan Chancellor
2026-01-05 22:01 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-05 23:46   ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2026-01-06  1:06     ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-06 21:53       ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-01-06 22:01         ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260105234605.GB1276749@ax162 \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox