From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60BE437F72F; Wed, 7 Jan 2026 15:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767800649; cv=none; b=Gz3ZqS8pA7S6HDbnuLtwB7lEa7UJ439ecJQViGUWRXA0tsHlTTD5MogaBC2+1jI12hSoPP/pQVsz5oJ8g4SBPkL7e8glP15MdeVCgZDFuLQd2+7aVyTpSBafK2PUCoxFijhpVuwLfG6sBBy2OK/XP0gqJIQRogAs1duUvYeTS8c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767800649; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BbLcyEIrDbOHeU05/snN426eettS5ViJfANxGihHTP4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AKltmgroZGqiIrwGY3V+Mbtb/Le+DrRGZ42ReNcIu6C97mgOHwXeoZgQYZpi9ToFlWSospH7KDbenImue6UrE8+rnwHHT+G/QtVrzcyTI15iMKRYbjxCFAJkCDVlimAx1ATf9FEL2cky6bd9yn+HoNltBpymGRG9dyAHNRxlcNQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=R8/Ls6FN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="R8/Ls6FN" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=z3wIbGTqvKpReucdUbctr3AoGZHR+7Wb1hGUtOYukf0=; b=R8/Ls6FN62kI5tFv2DM5x+yRbN aaEX8Q3gmTXtRX6AYaauk0BYG2nWamV39wcPNwRwqsMBJfMPH5p5L7y1FuRW1sBw7CkaoDH0m/6VI HqeOs0Vx/vH/X6Q+QQ5ozsH0GEY+dZSjVJ0XzVWjggeTrFBnBp9qh3uGZrd28gzmiGQE4EsCgS2lr 5XCDEe57NMqskREqz0BDj48r4lsBBjmFN+CUHCS+f/XeMlDGQc4yU/3K6MeXIUW8Pm1sayAxOOJOj Dv0D+dYLWFV+EQhbKFYS3IybBp/gJOUppQr9Se/KvOcrQB5uEFXvxhuwz79Umttm+SSyZJG6Rg4NE JXzGauaQ==; Received: from 2001-1c00-8d85-5700-266e-96ff-fe07-7dcc.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl ([2001:1c00:8d85:5700:266e:96ff:fe07:7dcc] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vdVhd-0000000Dbhw-24pv; Wed, 07 Jan 2026 15:44:05 +0000 Received: by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E0F2630057E; Wed, 07 Jan 2026 16:44:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 16:44:04 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Rustam Kovhaev Cc: Sami Tolvanen , Alexei Starovoitov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kernel crashes in BPF JIT code with kCFI and clang on x86 Message-ID: <20260107154404.GJ3708021@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20251223034332.GA2008178@nuc10> <20260107093639.GC3707891@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260107093639.GC3707891@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 10:36:39AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 07:43:32PM -0800, Rustam Kovhaev wrote: > > After switching to clang kbuild always generates these huge paddings in my kernel config: > > rusty@nuc10:~/code/kbuild_rust$ grep -e IBT -e PADDING .config > > CONFIG_CC_HAS_IBT=y > > CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT=y > > CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY_PHYSICAL_PADDING=0xa > > CONFIG_CC_HAS_ENTRY_PADDING=y > > CONFIG_FUNCTION_PADDING_CFI=59 > > CONFIG_FUNCTION_PADDING_BYTES=59 > > CONFIG_CALL_PADDING=y > > CONFIG_FINEIBT=y > > Oh gawd, you have FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT_64B. Yeah, I suppose that wasn't > tested very well. > > Let me go check all that code. I replied here: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20260107153603.GI3708021@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net but Gmail is fscking useless and figured that reply is spam. Please consider using a 'real' mail host.