From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: adubey@linux.ibm.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, hbathini@linux.ibm.com,
sachinpb@linux.ibm.com, venkat88@linux.ibm.com,
andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, mykolal@fb.com,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
naveen@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
npiggin@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com, iii@linux.ibm.com,
shuah@kernel.org, Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] powerpc64/bpf: Tailcall handling with trampolines
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 03:39:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202601150350.ZftaCBVV-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260114114450.30405-4-adubey@linux.ibm.com>
Hi,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
[also build test ERROR on powerpc/fixes linus/master v6.19-rc5 next-20260114]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/adubey-linux-ibm-com/powerpc64-bpf-Move-tail_call_cnt-to-bottom-of-stack-frame/20260114-195044
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260114114450.30405-4-adubey%40linux.ibm.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 3/6] powerpc64/bpf: Tailcall handling with trampolines
config: powerpc-randconfig-002-20260114 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260115/202601150350.ZftaCBVV-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: powerpc-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260115/202601150350.ZftaCBVV-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601150350.ZftaCBVV-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function 'bpf_trampoline_setup_tail_call_info':
>> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:644:43: error: 'BPF_PPC_TAILCALL' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'BPF_TAIL_CALL'?
644 | int tailcallinfo_offset = BPF_PPC_TAILCALL;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| BPF_TAIL_CALL
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:644:43: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function '__arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline':
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:850:41: error: 'BPF_PPC_TAILCALL' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'BPF_TAIL_CALL'?
850 | bpf_frame_size += SZL + BPF_PPC_TAILCALL;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| BPF_TAIL_CALL
vim +644 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
625
626 /*
627 * Refer the label 'Generated stack layout' in this file for actual stack
628 * layout during trampoline invocation.
629 *
630 * Refer __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() for stack component details.
631 *
632 * The tailcall count/reference is present in caller's stack frame. Its required
633 * to copy the content of tail_call_info before calling the actual function
634 * to which the trampoline is attached.
635 *
636 */
637
638 static void bpf_trampoline_setup_tail_call_info(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx,
639 int func_frame_offset,
640 int bpf_dummy_frame_size, int r4_off)
641 {
642 if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64)) {
643 /* See bpf_jit_stack_tailcallinfo_offset() */
> 644 int tailcallinfo_offset = BPF_PPC_TAILCALL;
645 /*
646 * func_frame_offset = ...(1)
647 * bpf_dummy_frame_size + trampoline_frame_size
648 */
649 EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(_R4, _R1, func_frame_offset));
650 EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(_R3, _R4, -tailcallinfo_offset));
651
652 /*
653 * Setting the tail_call_info in trampoline's frame
654 * depending on if previous frame had value or reference.
655 */
656 EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(_R3, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
657 PPC_COND_BRANCH(COND_GT, CTX_NIA(ctx) + 8);
658 EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(_R3, _R4, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallinfo_offset(ctx)));
659 /*
660 * From ...(1) above:
661 * trampoline_frame_bottom = ...(2)
662 * func_frame_offset - bpf_dummy_frame_size
663 *
664 * Using ...(2) derived above:
665 * trampoline_tail_call_info_offset = ...(3)
666 * trampoline_frame_bottom - tailcallinfo_offset
667 *
668 * From ...(3):
669 * Use trampoline_tail_call_info_offset to write reference of main's
670 * tail_call_info in trampoline frame.
671 */
672 EMIT(PPC_RAW_STL(_R3, _R1, (func_frame_offset - bpf_dummy_frame_size)
673 - tailcallinfo_offset));
674
675 } else {
676 /* See bpf_jit_stack_offsetof() and BPF_PPC_TC */
677 EMIT(PPC_RAW_LL(_R4, _R1, r4_off));
678 }
679 }
680
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-14 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-14 11:44 [PATCH v2 0/6] powerpc64/bpf: Support tailcalls with subprogs & BPF exceptions adubey
2026-01-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] powerpc64/bpf: Move tail_call_cnt to bottom of stack frame adubey
2026-01-14 12:25 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-15 8:29 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-01-17 10:11 ` Hari Bathini
[not found] ` <3e1c5930518113f349625cfa80ce82f5@imap.linux.ibm.com>
2026-01-17 10:59 ` Hari Bathini
2026-01-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] powerpc64/bpf: Support tailcalls with subprogs adubey
2026-01-14 12:27 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
[not found] ` <2d242f4476b61373da236d24272b0ec3@imap.linux.ibm.com>
2026-01-16 4:50 ` Hari Bathini
2026-01-16 7:49 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-01-16 13:59 ` Hari Bathini
2026-01-17 10:23 ` Hari Bathini
2026-01-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] powerpc64/bpf: Tailcall handling with trampolines adubey
2026-01-14 12:25 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-14 19:39 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2026-01-17 10:39 ` Hari Bathini
2026-01-17 10:41 ` Hari Bathini
2026-01-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] powerpc64/bpf: Add arch_bpf_stack_walk() for BPF JIT adubey
2026-01-14 12:37 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
[not found] ` <bec1dfbacced0198fa76bc59e73811c6@imap.linux.ibm.com>
2026-01-16 5:38 ` Hari Bathini
2026-01-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] powerpc64/bpf: Support exceptions adubey
2026-01-16 6:27 ` Hari Bathini
[not found] ` <77a6a07add66189fbc9b68a410911e3c@imap.linux.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <cf1aea1601d03d42b3afde367c29d26b@imap.linux.ibm.com>
2026-01-16 7:48 ` Hari Bathini
2026-01-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] powerpc64/bpf: Additional NVR handling for bpf_throw adubey
2026-01-14 12:35 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-17 10:51 ` Hari Bathini
2026-01-14 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] powerpc64/bpf: Support tailcalls with subprogs & BPF exceptions Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202601150350.ZftaCBVV-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=adubey@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=naveen@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sachinpb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox