public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: adubey@linux.ibm.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, hbathini@linux.ibm.com,
	sachinpb@linux.ibm.com, venkat88@linux.ibm.com,
	andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, mykolal@fb.com,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
	haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
	naveen@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	npiggin@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com, iii@linux.ibm.com,
	shuah@kernel.org, Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] powerpc64/bpf: Tailcall handling with trampolines
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 03:39:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202601150350.ZftaCBVV-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260114114450.30405-4-adubey@linux.ibm.com>

Hi,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
[also build test ERROR on powerpc/fixes linus/master v6.19-rc5 next-20260114]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/adubey-linux-ibm-com/powerpc64-bpf-Move-tail_call_cnt-to-bottom-of-stack-frame/20260114-195044
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260114114450.30405-4-adubey%40linux.ibm.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 3/6] powerpc64/bpf: Tailcall handling with trampolines
config: powerpc-randconfig-002-20260114 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260115/202601150350.ZftaCBVV-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: powerpc-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260115/202601150350.ZftaCBVV-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601150350.ZftaCBVV-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function 'bpf_trampoline_setup_tail_call_info':
>> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:644:43: error: 'BPF_PPC_TAILCALL' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'BPF_TAIL_CALL'?
     644 |                 int tailcallinfo_offset = BPF_PPC_TAILCALL;
         |                                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                                           BPF_TAIL_CALL
   arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:644:43: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
   arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function '__arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline':
   arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:850:41: error: 'BPF_PPC_TAILCALL' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'BPF_TAIL_CALL'?
     850 |                 bpf_frame_size += SZL + BPF_PPC_TAILCALL;
         |                                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                                         BPF_TAIL_CALL


vim +644 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c

   625	
   626	/*
   627	 * Refer the label 'Generated stack layout' in this file for actual stack
   628	 * layout during trampoline invocation.
   629	 *
   630	 * Refer __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() for stack component details.
   631	 *
   632	 * The tailcall count/reference is present in caller's stack frame. Its required
   633	 * to copy the content of tail_call_info before calling the actual function
   634	 * to which the trampoline is attached.
   635	 *
   636	 */
   637	
   638	static void bpf_trampoline_setup_tail_call_info(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx,
   639						       int func_frame_offset,
   640						       int bpf_dummy_frame_size, int r4_off)
   641	{
   642		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64)) {
   643			/* See bpf_jit_stack_tailcallinfo_offset() */
 > 644			int tailcallinfo_offset = BPF_PPC_TAILCALL;
   645			/*
   646			 * func_frame_offset =                                   ...(1)
   647			 *     bpf_dummy_frame_size + trampoline_frame_size
   648			 */
   649			EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(_R4, _R1, func_frame_offset));
   650			EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(_R3, _R4, -tailcallinfo_offset));
   651	
   652			/*
   653			 * Setting the tail_call_info in trampoline's frame
   654			 * depending on if previous frame had value or reference.
   655			 */
   656			EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(_R3, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
   657			PPC_COND_BRANCH(COND_GT, CTX_NIA(ctx) + 8);
   658			EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(_R3, _R4, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallinfo_offset(ctx)));
   659			/*
   660			 * From ...(1) above:
   661			 * trampoline_frame_bottom =                            ...(2)
   662			 *     func_frame_offset - bpf_dummy_frame_size
   663			 *
   664			 * Using ...(2) derived above:
   665			 *  trampoline_tail_call_info_offset =                  ...(3)
   666			 *      trampoline_frame_bottom - tailcallinfo_offset
   667			 *
   668			 * From ...(3):
   669			 * Use trampoline_tail_call_info_offset to write reference of main's
   670			 * tail_call_info in trampoline frame.
   671			 */
   672			EMIT(PPC_RAW_STL(_R3, _R1, (func_frame_offset - bpf_dummy_frame_size)
   673						- tailcallinfo_offset));
   674	
   675		} else {
   676			/* See bpf_jit_stack_offsetof() and BPF_PPC_TC */
   677			EMIT(PPC_RAW_LL(_R4, _R1, r4_off));
   678		}
   679	}
   680	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-14 19:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-14 11:44 [PATCH v2 0/6] powerpc64/bpf: Support tailcalls with subprogs & BPF exceptions adubey
2026-01-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] powerpc64/bpf: Move tail_call_cnt to bottom of stack frame adubey
2026-01-14 12:25   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-15  8:29   ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-01-17 10:11   ` Hari Bathini
     [not found]     ` <3e1c5930518113f349625cfa80ce82f5@imap.linux.ibm.com>
2026-01-17 10:59       ` Hari Bathini
2026-01-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] powerpc64/bpf: Support tailcalls with subprogs adubey
2026-01-14 12:27   ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
     [not found]     ` <2d242f4476b61373da236d24272b0ec3@imap.linux.ibm.com>
2026-01-16  4:50       ` Hari Bathini
2026-01-16  7:49         ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-01-16 13:59           ` Hari Bathini
2026-01-17 10:23   ` Hari Bathini
2026-01-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] powerpc64/bpf: Tailcall handling with trampolines adubey
2026-01-14 12:25   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-14 19:39   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2026-01-17 10:39   ` Hari Bathini
2026-01-17 10:41     ` Hari Bathini
2026-01-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] powerpc64/bpf: Add arch_bpf_stack_walk() for BPF JIT adubey
2026-01-14 12:37   ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
     [not found]     ` <bec1dfbacced0198fa76bc59e73811c6@imap.linux.ibm.com>
2026-01-16  5:38       ` Hari Bathini
2026-01-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] powerpc64/bpf: Support exceptions adubey
2026-01-16  6:27   ` Hari Bathini
     [not found]     ` <77a6a07add66189fbc9b68a410911e3c@imap.linux.ibm.com>
     [not found]       ` <cf1aea1601d03d42b3afde367c29d26b@imap.linux.ibm.com>
2026-01-16  7:48         ` Hari Bathini
2026-01-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] powerpc64/bpf: Additional NVR handling for bpf_throw adubey
2026-01-14 12:35   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-17 10:51   ` Hari Bathini
2026-01-14 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] powerpc64/bpf: Support tailcalls with subprogs & BPF exceptions Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202601150350.ZftaCBVV-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=adubey@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sachinpb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox