From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>,
kkd@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 1/6] bpf: Support repeat, duration fields for syscall prog runs
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 10:12:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260211181248.3040142-2-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260211181248.3040142-1-memxor@gmail.com>
Currently, BPF syscall programs do not support specifying the repeat
field to repeat the test inside the kernel multiple times. Use the
test_timer infra for other prog run tests and make it with RCU tasks
trace to allow usage for syscall programs. Also make the duration field
available for use.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
net/bpf/test_run.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 178c4738e63b..4e06e516d9f2 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -33,23 +33,27 @@ struct bpf_test_timer {
u64 time_start, time_spent;
};
-static void bpf_test_timer_enter(struct bpf_test_timer *t)
- __acquires(rcu)
+static void __bpf_test_timer_enter(struct bpf_test_timer *t, bool trace)
{
- rcu_read_lock_dont_migrate();
+ if (trace)
+ rcu_read_lock_trace();
+ else
+ rcu_read_lock_dont_migrate();
t->time_start = ktime_get_ns();
}
-static void bpf_test_timer_leave(struct bpf_test_timer *t)
- __releases(rcu)
+static void __bpf_test_timer_leave(struct bpf_test_timer *t, bool trace)
{
t->time_start = 0;
- rcu_read_unlock_migrate();
+ if (trace)
+ rcu_read_unlock_trace();
+ else
+ rcu_read_unlock_migrate();
}
-static bool bpf_test_timer_continue(struct bpf_test_timer *t, int iterations,
- u32 repeat, int *err, u32 *duration)
- __must_hold(rcu)
+static bool __bpf_test_timer_continue(struct bpf_test_timer *t,
+ int iterations, u32 repeat,
+ int *err, u32 *duration, bool trace)
{
t->i += iterations;
if (t->i >= repeat) {
@@ -70,9 +74,9 @@ static bool bpf_test_timer_continue(struct bpf_test_timer *t, int iterations,
if (need_resched()) {
/* During iteration: we need to reschedule between runs. */
t->time_spent += ktime_get_ns() - t->time_start;
- bpf_test_timer_leave(t);
+ __bpf_test_timer_leave(t, trace);
cond_resched();
- bpf_test_timer_enter(t);
+ __bpf_test_timer_enter(t, trace);
}
/* Do another round. */
@@ -83,6 +87,45 @@ static bool bpf_test_timer_continue(struct bpf_test_timer *t, int iterations,
return false;
}
+static void bpf_test_timer_enter(struct bpf_test_timer *t)
+ __acquires(rcu)
+{
+ __bpf_test_timer_enter(t, false);
+}
+
+static void bpf_test_timer_leave(struct bpf_test_timer *t)
+ __releases(rcu)
+{
+ __bpf_test_timer_leave(t, false);
+}
+
+static bool bpf_test_timer_continue(struct bpf_test_timer *t, int iterations,
+ u32 repeat, int *err, u32 *duration)
+ __must_hold(rcu)
+{
+ return __bpf_test_timer_continue(t, iterations, repeat, err, duration, false);
+}
+
+static void bpf_test_timer_enter_trace(struct bpf_test_timer *t)
+ __acquires(rcu_trace)
+{
+ __bpf_test_timer_enter(t, true);
+}
+
+static void bpf_test_timer_leave_trace(struct bpf_test_timer *t)
+ __releases(rcu_trace)
+{
+ __bpf_test_timer_leave(t, true);
+}
+
+static bool bpf_test_timer_continue_trace(struct bpf_test_timer *t,
+ int iterations, u32 repeat,
+ int *err, u32 *duration)
+ __must_hold(rcu_trace)
+{
+ return __bpf_test_timer_continue(t, iterations, repeat, err, duration, true);
+}
+
/* We put this struct at the head of each page with a context and frame
* initialised when the page is allocated, so we don't have to do this on each
* repetition of the test run.
@@ -1615,14 +1658,14 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_syscall(struct bpf_prog *prog,
{
void __user *ctx_in = u64_to_user_ptr(kattr->test.ctx_in);
__u32 ctx_size_in = kattr->test.ctx_size_in;
+ struct bpf_test_timer t = {};
+ u32 retval, duration, repeat;
void *ctx = NULL;
- u32 retval;
int err = 0;
- /* doesn't support data_in/out, ctx_out, duration, or repeat or flags */
+ /* doesn't support data_in/out, ctx_out, or flags */
if (kattr->test.data_in || kattr->test.data_out ||
- kattr->test.ctx_out || kattr->test.duration ||
- kattr->test.repeat || kattr->test.flags ||
+ kattr->test.ctx_out || kattr->test.flags ||
kattr->test.batch_size)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1636,14 +1679,27 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_syscall(struct bpf_prog *prog,
return PTR_ERR(ctx);
}
- rcu_read_lock_trace();
- retval = bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(prog, ctx);
- rcu_read_unlock_trace();
+ repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
+ if (!repeat)
+ repeat = 1;
+
+ bpf_test_timer_enter_trace(&t);
+ do {
+ retval = bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(prog, ctx);
+ } while (bpf_test_timer_continue_trace(&t, 1, repeat, &err, &duration));
+ bpf_test_timer_leave_trace(&t);
+
+ if (err)
+ goto out;
if (copy_to_user(&uattr->test.retval, &retval, sizeof(u32))) {
err = -EFAULT;
goto out;
}
+ if (copy_to_user(&uattr->test.duration, &duration, sizeof(duration))) {
+ err = -EFAULT;
+ goto out;
+ }
if (ctx_size_in)
if (copy_to_user(ctx_in, ctx, ctx_size_in))
err = -EFAULT;
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-11 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-11 18:12 [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 0/6] Concurrency Testing Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-02-11 18:12 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2026-02-11 22:02 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 1/6] bpf: Support repeat, duration fields for syscall prog runs Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-11 18:12 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 2/6] bpf: Allow timing functions in lock critical sections Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-02-11 18:12 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 3/6] bpf: Enable rqspinlock in tracing progs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-02-11 22:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-11 18:12 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 4/6] selftests/bpf: Introduce concurrency testing tool Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-02-11 22:08 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-11 18:12 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 5/6] selftests/bpf: Generate various conctest permutations Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-02-11 22:09 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-11 18:12 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 6/6] selftests/bpf: Extend conctest to wq and task_work Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260211181248.3040142-2-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kkd@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=yatsenko@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox