From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qv1-f53.google.com (mail-qv1-f53.google.com [209.85.219.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 650DE13B5B3 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2026 22:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.53 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773699284; cv=none; b=KWQAepn3i9TTlyxMwA8NvaQBGl+NNRk5Q789/xKozD1Rm+F0UUpOePOsPXLjVJ4KkrSB5I456FW/3y3iF6eeHlOEvqq+Tv09qBEUHOz/xMMD9VLuBstOiljFRFL3bSJTseN7bDFTQmLM7R5gJbLIFRMuflX1iAtwLJOZcoTqGgE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773699284; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HGj5yiUG7iKWATjOzUz8OSk7F9PspHcBFX+MhNveJts=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=kaUOodzq5YLBCy12vxsrcBva0/WSlyOeTBMSdbRVf9XKFT7ZpAaQnOuoWZPu3CrNP9uXgrIAME+BStZjwKMLRELYCZQHkiu+P4YIUhZMQ4yXyQYkZhhW8vYGwcLV6BWErTo/75MzZOZ8ZDhJ7hZDvLswImW6kBrFR1xtyZHO+lk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=gTH+pELL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.53 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="gTH+pELL" Received: by mail-qv1-f53.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-89c4b4ece7bso2159616d6.0 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2026 15:14:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1773699282; x=1774304082; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=1xVo0DvHLvdFL5zFcyTS5pi/B+LyIVJQdufAwf30Klo=; b=gTH+pELLcKYJsiNcJvWi2+XVvonHdHeESyISqkJ/8XBdU31sJZU54Dafsf+tOfcO7S LZzyi6Q27OscB9DBKM9PSCFNq3bIKRKI8AzHzvgxAHOFdvk69VUkYpszBl0bMrG4o+qm CwmF7fOYP9iFPaXJtuSJY6C3P99CZv0dmNHpssHaizJu4v8p7xTVxvu8E+VKDP9XyYbh bsCGmdfxFVAydBEnEm8d5FNfbjZhIDOlfDb/GdiFjs729HlD/PyygvwmB898d4lbFH77 chh4j6zq4JEDejcZCjtpD+Tj/P4lZ76LcXgXMzYv+feMt9RPGjhgVGCYOHqugQ2mI7VP EKaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1773699282; x=1774304082; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1xVo0DvHLvdFL5zFcyTS5pi/B+LyIVJQdufAwf30Klo=; b=a6tI8XswoyDE/OTzi2sX1fvZy8QmuLhv5tHlFk2OyYgf7NMh18MhP3NS5B5oAZ1xPR eXiDxWxae2PxmFkjVeBQkbmwsVb6wnm+NLobhp9j811CJ04ByfqJE+8eQFyoe9guH7wB DshWtu6ilb+0pN0L9dEST9biYo5o7GXElJ+mwDz4miYtdyv7YimF9J6sAd8upDspiUd9 WObC4SSC0Qww8WekGR01rYi4JkBKUgg/NlbuDsSGqR0qVEMyHQ0JrUS8PecYZx0xpZGB 7+caNNHDeI6bgKkMyBK7hm1N0GiEeLkRCBw560h6Dw9exO0QV8ykNPDk3fOz7yVHORU8 5fkA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUyjC2yLTJ9ziJc9WkWIOy2JBOZzDmpWGA3A1VPcOvXvDAndkjt3FZ3BMc4Hfy20kdr+Ws=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YysOlBR/hKWiMsz8t4VWyoP5+aBExlR3HJjtUiY7NNwqR/GPUTL EXiNLKjrbsf9nPfNdMg2vMLFspuDhhHi7UlHgPXvDlbdbYCIn2jkMQzf X-Gm-Gg: ATEYQzwOo5aRX1LEJ1shhc0yeWq/eM3anxBQbp3/b2nvy7tmo8vcQDrmw2vLBQcDFa6 wDlcHMgD4bV0VI/u7cNUu7dcRmzBiQfxRx784thnx21Hf2Mc+XWl7NnM/yphFHP1Lz1iCO5Zr11 jGS6rvsBk1sxqrfN0df4ng6SSNFE8nbjZQPT4lVmGr3r840HbZrYI9vK7vVlm5s/U08vIl+0Bi5 cNJ14UJ+8S/gmSOY2efzKudY89HaP80OR/fuu4CjZOLrxuCV+JBCMUnkk2Is7Om5cHp1S7/x0Eh NHP/4VdzczFay0BYQCtbfJ4fPJ96T7uY/G9ooGxNDXaVdmvRMxMf2Di6E2m/dJYGUDAWLAqBeBB Yk5DmaQJXYQ1A+GsIJmm8tRvuTPrthFM+R175dV6AJc6/Vvrj4O6O9xIUBCPI0yCie388Cyh6qV nA8GCl3ct7O4xavU348/A+IsEybubXoEO3/Nepa6xzkX+LXY6e9YxAwLzOF9b4uDqFerTfK6RR3 cNSff0+xje5VDLqycXtCNL7B5ZD491UT2q2D7bDGA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:252a:b0:89a:424:984b with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-89c5e3c81ffmr17623666d6.31.1773699282359; Mon, 16 Mar 2026 15:14:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kerndev.lan (pool-100-15-227-251.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [100.15.227.251]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-89a65beeb7dsm145596556d6.19.2026.03.16.15.14.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 16 Mar 2026 15:14:42 -0700 (PDT) From: David Windsor To: fred@cloudflare.com Cc: paul@paul-moore.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, audit@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] audit: Implement bpf_audit_log_*() wrappers Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 18:14:40 -0400 Message-ID: <20260316221440.2043299-1-dwindsor@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20260311-bpf-auditd-send-message-v1-1-10a62db5c92f@cloudflare.com> References: <20260311-bpf-auditd-send-message-v1-1-10a62db5c92f@cloudflare.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Frederick, On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 04:31:17PM -0500, Frederick Lawler wrote: > +__bpf_kfunc int bpf_audit_log_cause(struct bpf_audit_context *ac, > + const char *cause__str) > +{ > + if (log_once(ac, BIT_ULL(LSM_AUDIT_DATA_CAUSE))) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + audit_log_format(ac->ab, " cause="); > + audit_log_untrustedstring(ac->ab, cause__str); > + return 0; > +} Rather than putting everything in the cause field, could we perhaps have a separate kfunc here that appends normal stringpairs (not format strings) to the audit record: bpf_audit_log_str(ac, "result", "denied"); bpf_audit_log_str(ac, "op", "read"); bpf_audit_log_str(ac, "scontext", ctx_str); I know you didn't want to wrap audit_log_format(), which makes sense, this would be a midway point between that and stuffing everything in one field. > +__bpf_kfunc int bpf_audit_log_net_sock(struct bpf_audit_context *ac, int netif, > + const struct socket *sock) > +{ > + struct lsm_network_audit net = { .sk = sock->sk, .netif = netif }; > + struct common_audit_data ad; > + > + ad.type = LSM_AUDIT_DATA_NET; > + ad.u.net = &net; > + return __audit_log_lsm_data(ac, &ad); > +} Should we also wrap ipv4_skb_to_auditdata() / ipv6_skb_to_auditdata()? Smack uses it in smack_socket_sock_rcv_skb. Thanks, David