From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
Cc: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Lorenz Bauer <lmb@isovalent.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] selftests/bpf: Initialize operation name before use
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 06:58:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260324065820.GC43072@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31243215-918a-4f03-917b-de869b7b7bf1@linux.dev>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 03:52:38PM -0700, Ihor Solodrai wrote:
> On 3/23/26 8:40 AM, Leo Yan wrote:
> > ASAN reports stack-buffer-overflow due to the uninitialized op_name.
> >
> > Initialize it to fix the issue.
> >
> > Fixes: 054b6c7866c7 ("selftests/bpf: Add verifier log tests for BPF_BTF_LOAD command")
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier_log.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier_log.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier_log.c
> > index aaa2854974c0a91cbbb9fc13ae0f966de1bcc818..dcbe2ef995c5b211c2b86b9555c02144e11ee7d6 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier_log.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier_log.c
> > @@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ static void verif_btf_log_subtest(bool bad_btf)
> > res = load_btf(&opts, true);
> > ASSERT_EQ(res, -ENOSPC, "half_log_fd");
> > ASSERT_EQ(strlen(logs.buf), 24, "log_fixed_25");
> > + snprintf(op_name, sizeof(op_name), "log_fixed");
>
> You should use strscpy() here.
Sure, I will change to :
strscpy(op_name, "log_fixed", sizeof(op_name));
> This patch looks very unrelated.
> Did this surface only after the changes in the makefiles?
Yes. This change fixes ASAN error reported by BPF CI:
https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/23239705647/job/67554431963
Thanks,
Leo
> > ASSERT_STRNEQ(logs.buf, logs.reference, 24, op_name);
> >
> > /* validate rolling verifier log logic: try all variations of log buf
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-23 15:40 [PATCH 0/6] tools build: bpf: Append EXTRA_CFLAGS and HOST_EXTRACFLAGS Leo Yan
2026-03-23 15:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] bpftool: Avoid adding EXTRA_CFLAGS to HOST_CFLAGS Leo Yan
2026-03-31 8:46 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-23 15:40 ` [PATCH 2/6] bpftool: Append extra host flags Leo Yan
2026-03-23 15:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] libbpf: Initialize CFLAGS before including Makefile.include Leo Yan
2026-03-23 22:50 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-03-23 15:40 ` [PATCH 4/6] tools/bpf: build: Append extra cflags Leo Yan
2026-03-23 15:40 ` [PATCH 5/6] selftests/bpf: Initialize operation name before use Leo Yan
2026-03-23 22:52 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-03-24 6:58 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2026-03-24 15:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-03-23 15:40 ` [PATCH 6/6] selftests/bpf: Append extra cflags Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260324065820.GC43072@e132581.arm.com \
--to=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lmb@isovalent.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=qmo@kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox