From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Mykyta Yatsenko <mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com>,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf v5 0/3] bpf: fix and improve open-coded task_vma iterator
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 04:22:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260326112242.2260320-1-puranjay@kernel.org> (raw)
Changelog:
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260316185736.649940-1-puranjay@kernel.org/
Changes in v5:
- Use get_task_mm() instead of a lockless task->mm read followed by
mmget_not_zero() to fix a use-after-free: mm_struct is not
SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, so the lockless pointer can go stale (AI)
- Add a local bpf_iter_mmput_async() wrapper with #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
to avoid modifying fork.c and sched/mm.h outside the BPF tree
- Drop the fork.c and sched/mm.h changes that widened the
mmput_async() #if guard
- Disable IRQs around get_task_mm() to prevent raw tracepoint
re-entrancy from deadlocking on task_lock()
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260311225726.808332-1-puranjay@kernel.org/
Changes in v4:
- Disable task_vma iterator in irq_disabled() contexts to mitigate deadlocks (Alexei)
- Use a helper function to reset the snapshot (Andrii)
- Remove the redundant snap->vm_mm = kit->data->mm; (Andrii)
- Remove all irq_work deferral as the iterator will not work in
irq_disabled() sections anymore and _new() will return -EBUSY early.
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260309155506.23490-1-puranjay@kernel.org/
Changes in v3:
- Remove the rename patch 1 (Andrii)
- Put the irq_work in the iter data, per-cpu slot is not needed (Andrii)
- Remove the unnecessary !in_hardirq() in the deferral path (Alexei)
- Use PAGE_SIZE advancement in case vma shrinks back to maintain the
forward progress guarantee (AI)
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260304142026.1443666-1-puranjay@kernel.org/
Changes in v2:
- Add a preparatory patch to rename mmap_unlock_irq_work to
bpf_iter_mm_irq_work (Mykyta)
- Fix bpf_iter_mmput() to also defer for IRQ disabled regions (Alexei)
- Fix a build issue where mmpu_async() is not available without
CONFIG_MMU (kernel test robot)
- Reuse mmap_unlock_irq_work (after rename) for mmput (Mykyta)
- Move vma lookup (retry block) to a separate function (Mykyta)
This series fixes the mm lifecycle handling in the open-coded task_vma
BPF iterator and switches it from mmap_lock to per-VMA locking to reduce
contention. It then fixes a deadlock that is caused by holding locks
accross the body of the iterator where faulting is allowed.
Patch 1 fixes a use-after-free where task->mm was read locklessly and
could be freed before the iterator used it. It uses get_task_mm() to
safely acquire the mm reference under task_lock() and disables the
iterator in irq_disabled() contexts by returning -EBUSY from _new().
Patch 2 switches from holding mmap_lock for the entire iteration to
per-VMA locking via lock_vma_under_rcu(). This still doesn't fix the
deadlock problem because holding the per-vma lock for the whole
iteration can still cause lock ordering issues when a faultable helper
is called in the body of the iterator.
Patch 3 resolves the lock ordering problems caused by holding the
per-VMA lock or the mmap_lock (not applicable after patch 2) across BPF
program execution. It snapshots VMA fields under the lock, then drops
the lock before returning to the BPF program. File references are
managed via get_file()/fput() across iterations.
Puranjay Mohan (3):
bpf: fix mm lifecycle in open-coded task_vma iterator
bpf: switch task_vma iterator from mmap_lock to per-VMA locks
bpf: return VMA snapshot from task_vma iterator
kernel/bpf/task_iter.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 125 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
base-commit: c369299895a591d96745d6492d4888259b004a9e
--
2.52.0
reply other threads:[~2026-03-26 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260326112242.2260320-1-puranjay@kernel.org \
--to=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com \
--cc=puranjay12@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox