From: Samuel Wu <wusamuel@google.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Samuel Wu <wusamuel@google.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] PM: wakeup: Add kfuncs to traverse over wakeup_sources
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:34:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260331153413.2469218-2-wusamuel@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331153413.2469218-1-wusamuel@google.com>
Iterating through wakeup sources via sysfs or debugfs can be inefficient
or restricted. Introduce BPF kfuncs to allow high-performance and safe
in-kernel traversal of the wakeup_sources list.
The new kfuncs include:
- bpf_wakeup_sources_get_head() to obtain the list head.
- bpf_wakeup_sources_read_lock/unlock() to manage the SRCU lock.
For verifier safety, the underlying SRCU index is wrapped in an opaque
'struct bpf_ws_lock' pointer. This enables the use of KF_ACQUIRE and
KF_RELEASE flags, allowing the BPF verifier to strictly enforce paired
lock/unlock cycles and prevent resource leaks.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Wu <wusamuel@google.com>
---
drivers/base/power/power.h | 7 ++++
drivers/base/power/wakeup.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/power.h b/drivers/base/power/power.h
index 922ed457db19..8823aceeac8b 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/power.h
+++ b/drivers/base/power/power.h
@@ -168,3 +168,10 @@ static inline void device_pm_init(struct device *dev)
device_pm_sleep_init(dev);
pm_runtime_init(dev);
}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
+struct bpf_ws_lock { };
+struct bpf_ws_lock *bpf_wakeup_sources_read_lock(void);
+void bpf_wakeup_sources_read_unlock(struct bpf_ws_lock *lock);
+void *bpf_wakeup_sources_get_head(void);
+#endif
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
index b8e48a023bf0..8eda7d35d9cc 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
@@ -1168,11 +1168,79 @@ static const struct file_operations wakeup_sources_stats_fops = {
.release = seq_release_private,
};
-static int __init wakeup_sources_debugfs_init(void)
+#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
+#include <linux/btf.h>
+
+__bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
+
+/**
+ * bpf_wakeup_sources_read_lock - Acquire the SRCU lock for wakeup sources
+ *
+ * The underlying SRCU lock returns an integer index. However, the BPF verifier
+ * requires a pointer (PTR_TO_BTF_ID) to strictly track the state of acquired
+ * resources using KF_ACQUIRE and KF_RELEASE semantics. We use an opaque
+ * structure pointer (struct bpf_ws_lock *) to satisfy the verifier while
+ * safely encoding the integer index within the pointer address itself.
+ *
+ * Return: An opaque pointer encoding the SRCU lock index + 1 (to avoid NULL).
+ */
+__bpf_kfunc struct bpf_ws_lock *bpf_wakeup_sources_read_lock(void)
+{
+ return (struct bpf_ws_lock *)(long)(wakeup_sources_read_lock() + 1);
+}
+
+/**
+ * bpf_wakeup_sources_read_unlock - Release the SRCU lock for wakeup sources
+ * @lock: The opaque pointer returned by bpf_wakeup_sources_read_lock()
+ *
+ * The BPF verifier guarantees that @lock is a valid, unreleased pointer from
+ * the acquire function. We decode the pointer back into the integer SRCU index
+ * by subtracting 1 and release the lock.
+ */
+__bpf_kfunc void bpf_wakeup_sources_read_unlock(struct bpf_ws_lock *lock)
+{
+ wakeup_sources_read_unlock((int)(long)lock - 1);
+}
+
+/**
+ * bpf_wakeup_sources_get_head - Get the head of the wakeup sources list
+ *
+ * Return: The head of the wakeup sources list.
+ */
+__bpf_kfunc void *bpf_wakeup_sources_get_head(void)
+{
+ return &wakeup_sources;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
+
+BTF_KFUNCS_START(wakeup_source_kfunc_ids)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_wakeup_sources_read_lock, KF_ACQUIRE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_wakeup_sources_read_unlock, KF_RELEASE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_wakeup_sources_get_head)
+BTF_KFUNCS_END(wakeup_source_kfunc_ids)
+
+static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set wakeup_source_kfunc_set = {
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .set = &wakeup_source_kfunc_ids,
+};
+
+static void __init wakeup_sources_bpf_init(void)
+{
+ if (register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL, &wakeup_source_kfunc_set))
+ pm_pr_dbg("Wakeup: failed to register BTF kfuncs\n");
+}
+#else
+static inline void wakeup_sources_bpf_init(void) {}
+#endif /* CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */
+
+static int __init wakeup_sources_init(void)
{
debugfs_create_file("wakeup_sources", 0444, NULL, NULL,
&wakeup_sources_stats_fops);
+ wakeup_sources_bpf_init();
+
return 0;
}
-postcore_initcall(wakeup_sources_debugfs_init);
+postcore_initcall(wakeup_sources_init);
--
2.53.0.1018.g2bb0e51243-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-31 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-31 15:34 [PATCH v3 0/2] Support BPF traversal of wakeup sources Samuel Wu
2026-03-31 15:34 ` Samuel Wu [this message]
2026-04-01 9:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] PM: wakeup: Add kfuncs to traverse over wakeup_sources Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-04-01 14:22 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-31 15:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add tests for wakeup_sources kfuncs Samuel Wu
2026-04-01 9:15 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Support BPF traversal of wakeup sources Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-04-01 19:07 ` Samuel Wu
2026-04-02 4:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-04-02 19:37 ` Samuel Wu
2026-04-03 10:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-04-03 16:28 ` Samuel Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260331153413.2469218-2-wusamuel@google.com \
--to=wusamuel@google.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox