public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com,
	yatsenko@meta.com, ameryhung@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] selftests/bpf: Fix task_local_data data allocation size
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 14:35:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260331213555.1993883-2-ameryhung@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331213555.1993883-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>

Currently, when allocating memory for data, size of tld_data_u->start
is not taken into account. This may cause OOB access. Fixed it by adding
the non-flexible array part of tld_data_u.

Besides, explicitly align tld_data_u->data to 8 bytes in case some
fields are added before data in the future. It could break the
assumption that every data field is 8 byte aligned and
sizeof(tld_data_u) will no longer be equal to
offsetof(struct tld_data_u, data), which we use interchangeably.

Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_data.h       | 12 +++++++-----
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_data.bpf.h        |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_data.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_data.h
index 7819f318b2fb..a52d8b549425 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_data.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_data.h
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ typedef struct {
 
 struct tld_metadata {
 	char name[TLD_NAME_LEN];
-	_Atomic __u16 size;
+	_Atomic __u16 size; /* size of tld_data_u->data */
 };
 
 struct tld_meta_u {
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ struct tld_meta_u {
 
 struct tld_data_u {
 	__u64 start; /* offset of tld_data_u->data in a page */
-	char data[];
+	char data[] __attribute__((aligned(8)));
 };
 
 struct tld_map_value {
@@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ static int __tld_init_data_p(int map_fd)
 	struct tld_data_u *data;
 	void *data_alloc = NULL;
 	int err, tid_fd = -1;
+	size_t size;
 
 	tid_fd = syscall(SYS_pidfd_open, sys_gettid(), O_EXCL);
 	if (tid_fd < 0) {
@@ -173,9 +174,10 @@ static int __tld_init_data_p(int map_fd)
 	 * tld_meta_p->size = TLD_DYN_DATA_SIZE +
 	 *          total size of TLDs defined via TLD_DEFINE_KEY()
 	 */
-	data_alloc = (use_aligned_alloc || tld_meta_p->size * 2 >= TLD_PAGE_SIZE) ?
-		aligned_alloc(TLD_PAGE_SIZE, tld_meta_p->size) :
-		malloc(tld_meta_p->size * 2);
+	size = tld_meta_p->size + sizeof(struct tld_data_u);
+	data_alloc = (use_aligned_alloc || size * 2 >= TLD_PAGE_SIZE) ?
+		aligned_alloc(TLD_PAGE_SIZE, size) :
+		malloc(size * 2);
 	if (!data_alloc) {
 		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_data.bpf.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_data.bpf.h
index 8b6f7af43648..1f396711f487 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_data.bpf.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_data.bpf.h
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ struct tld_meta_u {
 
 struct tld_data_u {
 	__u64 start; /* offset of tld_data_u->data in a page */
-	char data[__PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(__u64)];
+	char data[__PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(__u64)] __attribute__((aligned(8)));
 };
 
 struct tld_map_value {
-- 
2.52.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-31 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-31 21:35 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/5] Task local data bug fixes and improvement Amery Hung
2026-03-31 21:35 ` Amery Hung [this message]
2026-04-01  1:48   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] selftests/bpf: Fix task_local_data data allocation size sun jian
2026-03-31 21:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/5] selftests/bpf: Simplify task_local_data memory allocation Amery Hung
2026-04-01  1:46   ` sun jian
2026-03-31 21:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/5] selftests/bpf: Make sure TLD_DEFINE_KEY runs first Amery Hung
2026-04-01  2:16   ` sun jian
2026-03-31 21:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/5] selftests/bpf: Remove TLD_READ_ONCE() in the user space header Amery Hung
2026-04-01  4:22   ` sun jian
2026-03-31 21:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/5] selftests/bpf: Improve task local data documentation and fix potential memory leak Amery Hung
2026-04-01  4:11   ` sun jian
2026-04-02 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/5] Task local data bug fixes and improvement patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260331213555.1993883-2-ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --to=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=yatsenko@meta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox