public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Jose E . Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 00/10] bpf: Support stack arguments for BPF functions and kfuncs
Date: Wed,  1 Apr 2026 18:27:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260402012727.3916819-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)

Currently, bpf function calls and kfunc's are limited by 5 reg-level
parameters. For function calls with more than 5 parameters,
developers can use always inlining or pass a struct pointer
after packing more parameters in that struct. But there is
no workaround for kfunc if more than 5 parameters is needed.

This patch set lifts the 5-argument limit by introducing stack-based
argument passing for BPF functions and kfunc's, coordinated with
compiler support in LLVM [1]. The compiler emits stores/loads through
a new bpf register r12 (BPF_REG_STACK_ARG_BASE) to pass arguments beyond
the 5th, keeping the stack arg area separate from the r10-based program
stack. The maximum number of arguments is capped at MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS
(12), which is sufficient for the vast majority of use cases.

The x86_64 JIT translates r12-relative accesses to RBP-relative
native instructions. Each function's stack allocation is extended
by (incoming + max_outgoing) bytes to hold the stack arg area below
the program stack. This makes implementation easier as the r10 can
be reused for stack argument access. At BPF-to-BPF call sites, outgoing
args are pushed onto the native stack before CALL and popped after
return. For kfunc calls, args are marshaled per the x86_64 C calling
convention (arg 6 in R9, args 7+ on the native stack).

Global subprogs with >5 args are not yet supported. Only x86_64
is supported for now.

For the rest of patches, patches 1-5 added verifier support of
stack arguments for bpf-to-bpf functions and kfunc's. Patch 6
enables x86_64 for stack arguments. Patch 7 implemented JIT for
x86_64. Patches 8-10 are some selftests.

  [1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/189060 

Yonghong Song (10):
  bpf: Introduce bpf register BPF_REG_STACK_ARG_BASE
  bpf: Reuse MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS for maximum number of arguments
  bpf: Support stack arguments for bpf functions
  bpf: Support stack arguments for kfunc calls
  bpf: Reject stack arguments in non-JITed programs
  bpf: Enable stack argument support for x86_64
  bpf,x86: Implement JIT support for stack arguments
  selftests/bpf: Add tests for BPF function stack arguments
  selftests/bpf: Add negative test for oversized kfunc stack argument
  selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for stack argument validation

 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c                   | 150 +++++++-
 include/linux/bpf.h                           |   6 +
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h                  |  15 +-
 include/linux/filter.h                        |   4 +-
 kernel/bpf/btf.c                              |  21 +-
 kernel/bpf/core.c                             |  12 +-
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c                         | 351 ++++++++++++++++--
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stack_arg.c      | 143 +++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stack_arg_fail.c |  24 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c       |   2 +
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/stack_arg.c | 111 ++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/stack_arg_fail.c      |  32 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/stack_arg_kfunc.c     |  59 +++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_stack_arg.c  | 122 ++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c    |  29 ++
 .../bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h        |  14 +
 16 files changed, 1045 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stack_arg.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stack_arg_fail.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/stack_arg.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/stack_arg_fail.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/stack_arg_kfunc.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_stack_arg.c

-- 
2.52.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-04-02  1:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-02  1:27 Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-04-02  1:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/10] bpf: Introduce bpf register BPF_REG_STACK_ARG_BASE Yonghong Song
2026-04-02  1:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/10] bpf: Reuse MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS for maximum number of arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-02  1:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/10] bpf: Support stack arguments for bpf functions Yonghong Song
2026-04-02  3:18   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-02 14:42     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-02 18:55   ` Amery Hung
2026-04-02 20:45     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-02 23:38   ` Amery Hung
2026-04-03  4:05     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-02 23:38   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-03  4:10     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-05 21:07       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-06  4:29         ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-06  4:51           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-06  6:03             ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-06 15:17               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-06 16:19                 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-06 17:24                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-02  1:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/10] bpf: Support stack arguments for kfunc calls Yonghong Song
2026-04-02  3:18   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-02 14:45     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-02 21:02   ` Amery Hung
2026-04-02  1:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/10] bpf: Reject stack arguments in non-JITed programs Yonghong Song
2026-04-02  1:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/10] bpf: Enable stack argument support for x86_64 Yonghong Song
2026-04-02  1:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/10] bpf,x86: Implement JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-02 22:26   ` Amery Hung
2026-04-02 23:26     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-02 23:51   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-03  4:13     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-02  1:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/10] selftests/bpf: Add tests for BPF function " Yonghong Song
2026-04-02  1:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/10] selftests/bpf: Add negative test for oversized kfunc stack argument Yonghong Song
2026-04-02  1:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/10] selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for stack argument validation Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260402012727.3916819-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox