public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Jose E . Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 01/10] bpf: Introduce bpf register BPF_REG_STACK_ARG_BASE
Date: Wed,  1 Apr 2026 18:27:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260402012732.3917048-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260402012727.3916819-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

The newly-added register BPF_REG_STACK_ARG_BASE corresponds to bpf
register R12 added by [1]. R12 is used as the base for stack arguments
so it won't mess out R10 based stacks.

  [1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/189060

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 include/linux/filter.h | 3 ++-
 kernel/bpf/core.c      | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index e40d4071a345..68f018dd4b9c 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -59,7 +59,8 @@ struct ctl_table_header;
 
 /* Kernel hidden auxiliary/helper register. */
 #define BPF_REG_AX		MAX_BPF_REG
-#define MAX_BPF_EXT_REG		(MAX_BPF_REG + 1)
+#define BPF_REG_STACK_ARG_BASE	(MAX_BPF_REG + 1)
+#define MAX_BPF_EXT_REG		(MAX_BPF_REG + 2)
 #define MAX_BPF_JIT_REG		MAX_BPF_EXT_REG
 
 /* unused opcode to mark special call to bpf_tail_call() helper */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 1af5fb3f21d9..3520337a1c0e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -1299,8 +1299,8 @@ static int bpf_jit_blind_insn(const struct bpf_insn *from,
 	u32 imm_rnd = get_random_u32();
 	s16 off;
 
-	BUILD_BUG_ON(BPF_REG_AX  + 1 != MAX_BPF_JIT_REG);
-	BUILD_BUG_ON(MAX_BPF_REG + 1 != MAX_BPF_JIT_REG);
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(BPF_REG_AX + 2 != MAX_BPF_JIT_REG);
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(BPF_REG_STACK_ARG_BASE + 1 != MAX_BPF_JIT_REG);
 
 	/* Constraints on AX register:
 	 *
-- 
2.52.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-02  1:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-02  1:27 [PATCH bpf-next 00/10] bpf: Support stack arguments for BPF functions and kfuncs Yonghong Song
2026-04-02  1:27 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-04-02  1:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/10] bpf: Reuse MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS for maximum number of arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-02  1:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/10] bpf: Support stack arguments for bpf functions Yonghong Song
2026-04-02  3:18   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-02 14:42     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-02 18:55   ` Amery Hung
2026-04-02 20:45     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-02 23:38   ` Amery Hung
2026-04-03  4:05     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-02 23:38   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-03  4:10     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-05 21:07       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-06  4:29         ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-06  4:51           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-06  6:03             ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-06 15:17               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-06 16:19                 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-06 17:24                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-02  1:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/10] bpf: Support stack arguments for kfunc calls Yonghong Song
2026-04-02  3:18   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-02 14:45     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-02 21:02   ` Amery Hung
2026-04-02  1:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/10] bpf: Reject stack arguments in non-JITed programs Yonghong Song
2026-04-02  1:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/10] bpf: Enable stack argument support for x86_64 Yonghong Song
2026-04-02  1:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/10] bpf,x86: Implement JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-02 22:26   ` Amery Hung
2026-04-02 23:26     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-02 23:51   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-03  4:13     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-02  1:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/10] selftests/bpf: Add tests for BPF function " Yonghong Song
2026-04-02  1:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/10] selftests/bpf: Add negative test for oversized kfunc stack argument Yonghong Song
2026-04-02  1:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/10] selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for stack argument validation Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260402012732.3917048-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox