public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Jose E . Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/11] bpf: Refactor process_iter_arg() to have proper argument index
Date: Sun,  5 Apr 2026 10:26:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260405172606.1335686-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260405172505.1329392-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

In the next patch for kfunc stack arguments, a faked register is
used to do proper verification checking. For process_iter_arg(),
the regno is passed in and the iterator assumes 'regno - 1' as
the argument index. This is wrong as regno is fake. So refactor
process_iter_arg() by adding actual argument index which is used
inside the function.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 52a61021613b..183a4108fd4d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -9259,14 +9259,14 @@ static bool is_kfunc_arg_iter(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta, int arg_idx,
 }
 
 static int process_iter_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, int insn_idx,
-			    struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta)
+			    int argno, struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta)
 {
 	struct bpf_reg_state *reg = reg_state(env, regno);
 	const struct btf_type *t;
 	int spi, err, i, nr_slots, btf_id;
 
 	if (reg->type != PTR_TO_STACK) {
-		verbose(env, "arg#%d expected pointer to an iterator on stack\n", regno - 1);
+		verbose(env, "arg#%d expected pointer to an iterator on stack\n", argno);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
@@ -9276,9 +9276,9 @@ static int process_iter_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, int insn_id
 	 * to any kfunc, if arg has "__iter" suffix, we need to be a bit more
 	 * conservative here.
 	 */
-	btf_id = btf_check_iter_arg(meta->btf, meta->func_proto, regno - 1);
+	btf_id = btf_check_iter_arg(meta->btf, meta->func_proto, argno);
 	if (btf_id < 0) {
-		verbose(env, "expected valid iter pointer as arg #%d\n", regno - 1);
+		verbose(env, "expected valid iter pointer as arg #%d\n", argno);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	t = btf_type_by_id(meta->btf, btf_id);
@@ -9288,7 +9288,7 @@ static int process_iter_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, int insn_id
 		/* bpf_iter_<type>_new() expects pointer to uninit iter state */
 		if (!is_iter_reg_valid_uninit(env, reg, nr_slots)) {
 			verbose(env, "expected uninitialized iter_%s as arg #%d\n",
-				iter_type_str(meta->btf, btf_id), regno - 1);
+				iter_type_str(meta->btf, btf_id), argno);
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
@@ -9312,7 +9312,7 @@ static int process_iter_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, int insn_id
 			break;
 		case -EINVAL:
 			verbose(env, "expected an initialized iter_%s as arg #%d\n",
-				iter_type_str(meta->btf, btf_id), regno - 1);
+				iter_type_str(meta->btf, btf_id), argno);
 			return err;
 		case -EPROTO:
 			verbose(env, "expected an RCU CS when using %s\n", meta->func_name);
@@ -14063,7 +14063,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_
 					return -EINVAL;
 				}
 			}
-			ret = process_iter_arg(env, regno, insn_idx, meta);
+			ret = process_iter_arg(env, regno, insn_idx, i, meta);
 			if (ret < 0)
 				return ret;
 			break;
-- 
2.52.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-05 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-05 17:25 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/11] bpf: Support stack arguments for BPF functions and kfuncs Yonghong Song
2026-04-05 17:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/11] bpf: Introduce bpf register BPF_REG_STACK_ARG_BASE Yonghong Song
2026-04-05 17:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/11] bpf: Reuse MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS for maximum number of arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-05 17:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/11] bpf: Support stack arguments for bpf functions Yonghong Song
2026-04-05 18:20   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-08  4:38     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-05 17:26 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-04-05 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/11] bpf: Support stack arguments for kfunc calls Yonghong Song
2026-04-05 18:20   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-08  4:53     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-05 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/11] bpf: Reject stack arguments in non-JITed programs Yonghong Song
2026-04-05 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/11] bpf: Enable stack argument support for x86_64 Yonghong Song
2026-04-05 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/11] bpf,x86: Implement JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-05 18:20   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-08  4:40     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-08  4:42     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-05 20:36   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-06  4:14     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-06  4:54       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-06  4:59         ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-05 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/11] selftests/bpf: Add tests for BPF function " Yonghong Song
2026-04-05 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/11] selftests/bpf: Add negative test for greater-than-8-byte kfunc stack argument Yonghong Song
2026-04-05 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/11] selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for stack argument validation Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260405172606.1335686-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox