From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Dan Schatzberg <dschatzberg@meta.com>,
kkd@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/7] bpf: Enable unaligned accesses for syscall ctx
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2026 21:43:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260406194403.1649608-3-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260406194403.1649608-1-memxor@gmail.com>
Don't reject usage of fixed unaligned offsets for syscall ctx. Tests
will be added in later commits. Unaligned offsets already work for
variable offsets.
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 810991709da7..f1044ab9b03b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -6386,8 +6386,7 @@ static bool syscall_prog_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
{
if (off < 0 || off >= U16_MAX)
return false;
- if (off % size != 0)
- return false;
+ /* No alignment requirements for syscall ctx accesses. */
return true;
}
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-06 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-06 19:43 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/7] Allow variable offsets for syscall PTR_TO_CTX Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-04-06 19:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/7] bpf: Support " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-04-06 19:43 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2026-04-06 19:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/7] selftests/bpf: Convert ctx tests from ASM to C Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-04-06 19:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/7] selftests/bpf: Add syscall ctx variable offset tests Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-04-06 19:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/7] selftests/bpf: Test modified syscall ctx for ARG_PTR_TO_CTX Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-04-06 19:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/7] selftests/bpf: Add tests for unaligned syscall ctx accesses Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-04-06 19:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add tests for syscall ctx accesses beyond U16_MAX Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-04-06 22:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-06 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/7] Allow variable offsets for syscall PTR_TO_CTX patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260406194403.1649608-3-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dschatzberg@meta.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kkd@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox