From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com,
qmo@kernel.org, dxu@dxuuu.xyz, leon.hwang@linux.dev,
kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 7/8] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify global percpu data
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 21:24:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260414132421.63409-8-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260414132421.63409-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
If the arch, like s390x, does not support percpu insn, these cases won't
test global percpu data by checking -EOPNOTSUPP after loading prog.
The following APIs have been tested for global percpu data:
1. bpf_map__set_initial_value()
2. bpf_map__initial_value()
3. generated percpu struct pointer pointing to internal map's mmaped data
4. bpf_map__lookup_elem() for global percpu data map
At the same time, the case is also tested with 'bpftool gen skeleton -L'.
The verifier log is also tested.
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 2 +-
.../bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c | 223 ++++++++++++++++++
.../bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c | 66 ++++++
3 files changed, 290 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index f75c4f52c028..39ae3583983b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ LSKELS_SIGNED := fentry_test.c fexit_test.c atomics.c
# Generate both light skeleton and libbpf skeleton for these
LSKELS_EXTRA := test_ksyms_module.c test_ksyms_weak.c kfunc_call_test.c \
- kfunc_call_test_subprog.c
+ kfunc_call_test_subprog.c test_global_percpu_data.c
SKEL_BLACKLIST += $$(LSKELS) $$(LSKELS_SIGNED)
test_static_linked.skel.h-deps := test_static_linked1.bpf.o test_static_linked2.bpf.o
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c
index 8466332d7406..0b0384b6515e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "bpf/libbpf_internal.h"
+#include "test_global_percpu_data.skel.h"
+#include "test_global_percpu_data.lskel.h"
void test_global_data_init(void)
{
@@ -60,3 +63,223 @@ void test_global_data_init(void)
free(newval);
bpf_object__close(obj);
}
+
+static void test_global_percpu_data_init(void)
+{
+ struct test_global_percpu_data__percpu *percpu_data = NULL;
+ struct test_global_percpu_data__percpu *init_data, *data;
+ struct test_global_percpu_data__percpu init_value = {};
+ int key, prog_fd, err, num_cpus, num_online, i;
+ struct test_global_percpu_data *skel = NULL;
+ __u64 args[2] = {0x1234ULL, 0x5678ULL};
+ size_t elem_sz, init_data_sz;
+ struct bpf_map *map;
+ bool *online;
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
+ .ctx_in = args,
+ .ctx_size_in = sizeof(args),
+ .flags = BPF_F_TEST_RUN_ON_CPU,
+ );
+
+ num_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
+ if (!ASSERT_GT(num_cpus, 0, "libbpf_num_possible_cpus"))
+ return;
+
+ err = parse_cpu_mask_file("/sys/devices/system/cpu/online",
+ &online, &num_online);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "parse_cpu_mask_file"))
+ return;
+
+ elem_sz = roundup(sizeof(*percpu_data), 8);
+ percpu_data = calloc(num_cpus, elem_sz);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(percpu_data, "calloc percpu_data"))
+ goto out;
+
+ skel = test_global_percpu_data__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_global_percpu_data__open"))
+ goto out;
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->percpu, "skel->percpu"))
+ goto out;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->data, -1, "skel->percpu->data");
+ ASSERT_FALSE(skel->percpu->run, "skel->percpu->run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->nums[6], 0, "skel->percpu->nums[6]");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->struct_data.i, -1, "struct_data.i");
+ ASSERT_FALSE(skel->percpu->struct_data.set, "struct_data.set");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->struct_data.nums[6], 0, "struct_data.nums[6]");
+
+ map = skel->maps.percpu;
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map__type(map), BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY, "bpf_map__type"))
+ goto out;
+
+ init_value.data = 2;
+ init_value.nums[6] = -1;
+ init_value.struct_data.i = 2;
+ init_value.struct_data.nums[6] = -1;
+ err = bpf_map__set_initial_value(map, &init_value, sizeof(init_value));
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__set_initial_value"))
+ goto out;
+
+ init_data = bpf_map__initial_value(map, &init_data_sz);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(init_data, "bpf_map__initial_value"))
+ goto out;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(init_data->data, init_value.data, "init_value data");
+ ASSERT_EQ(init_data->run, init_value.run, "init_value run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(init_data->struct_data.i, init_value.struct_data.i,
+ "init_value struct_data.i");
+ ASSERT_EQ(init_data->struct_data.nums[6],
+ init_value.struct_data.nums[6],
+ "init_value struct_data.nums[6]");
+ ASSERT_EQ(init_data_sz, sizeof(init_value), "init_value size");
+ ASSERT_EQ((void *) init_data, (void *) skel->percpu,
+ "skel->percpu eq init_data");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->data, init_value.data,
+ "skel->percpu->data");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->run, init_value.run,
+ "skel->percpu->run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->struct_data.i, init_value.struct_data.i,
+ "skel->percpu->struct_data.i");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->struct_data.nums[6],
+ init_value.struct_data.nums[6],
+ "skel->percpu->struct_data.nums[6]");
+
+ err = test_global_percpu_data__load(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_global_percpu_data__load"))
+ goto out;
+
+ ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->percpu, "skel->percpu");
+
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.update_percpu_data);
+
+ /* run on every CPU */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_online; i++) {
+ if (!online[i])
+ continue;
+
+ topts.cpu = i;
+ topts.retval = 0;
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts");
+ ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts retval");
+ }
+
+ key = 0;
+ err = bpf_map__lookup_elem(map, &key, sizeof(key), percpu_data,
+ elem_sz * num_cpus, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__lookup_elem"))
+ goto out;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_online; i++) {
+ if (!online[i])
+ continue;
+
+ data = (void *)percpu_data + elem_sz * i;
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->data, 1, "percpu_data->data");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(data->run, "percpu_data->run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->nums[6], 0xc0de, "percpu_data->nums[6]");
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->struct_data.i, 1, "struct_data.i");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(data->struct_data.set, "struct_data.set");
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->struct_data.nums[6], 0xc0de, "struct_data.nums[6]");
+ }
+
+out:
+ test_global_percpu_data__destroy(skel);
+ free(percpu_data);
+ free(online);
+}
+
+static void test_global_percpu_data_lskel(void)
+{
+ struct test_global_percpu_data__percpu *data, *percpu_data = NULL;
+ int key, prog_fd, map_fd, err, num_cpus, num_online, i;
+ struct test_global_percpu_data_lskel *lskel = NULL;
+ __u64 args[2] = {0x1234ULL, 0x5678ULL};
+ size_t elem_sz;
+ bool *online;
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
+ .ctx_in = args,
+ .ctx_size_in = sizeof(args),
+ .flags = BPF_F_TEST_RUN_ON_CPU,
+ );
+
+ num_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
+ if (!ASSERT_GT(num_cpus, 0, "libbpf_num_possible_cpus"))
+ return;
+
+ err = parse_cpu_mask_file("/sys/devices/system/cpu/online",
+ &online, &num_online);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "parse_cpu_mask_file"))
+ return;
+
+ elem_sz = roundup(sizeof(*percpu_data), 8);
+ percpu_data = calloc(num_cpus, elem_sz);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(percpu_data, "calloc percpu_data"))
+ goto out;
+
+ lskel = test_global_percpu_data_lskel__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(lskel, "test_global_percpu_data_lskel__open"))
+ goto out;
+
+ err = test_global_percpu_data_lskel__load(lskel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_global_percpu_data_lskel__load"))
+ goto out;
+
+ prog_fd = lskel->progs.update_percpu_data.prog_fd;
+
+ /* run on every CPU */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_online; i++) {
+ if (!online[i])
+ continue;
+
+ topts.cpu = i;
+ topts.retval = 0;
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts");
+ ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts retval");
+ }
+
+ key = 0;
+ map_fd = lskel->maps.percpu.map_fd;
+ err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &key, percpu_data);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))
+ goto out;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_online; i++) {
+ if (!online[i])
+ continue;
+
+ data = (void *)percpu_data + elem_sz * i;
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->data, 1, "percpu_data->data");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(data->run, "percpu_data->run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->nums[6], 0xc0de, "percpu_data->nums[6]");
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->struct_data.i, 1, "struct_data.i");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(data->struct_data.set, "struct_data.set");
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->struct_data.nums[6], 0xc0de, "struct_data.nums[6]");
+ }
+
+out:
+ test_global_percpu_data_lskel__destroy(lskel);
+ free(percpu_data);
+ free(online);
+}
+
+static void test_global_percpu_data_verifier_failure(void)
+{
+ RUN_TESTS(test_global_percpu_data);
+}
+
+void test_global_percpu_data(void)
+{
+ if (!feat_supported(NULL, FEAT_PERCPU_DATA)) {
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("init"))
+ test_global_percpu_data_init();
+ if (test__start_subtest("lskel"))
+ test_global_percpu_data_lskel();
+ if (test__start_subtest("verifier_failure"))
+ test_global_percpu_data_verifier_failure();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..947721c21f30
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+int data SEC(".percpu") = -1;
+int nums[7] SEC(".percpu");
+char run SEC(".percpu") = 0;
+struct {
+ char set;
+ int i;
+ int nums[7];
+} struct_data SEC(".percpu") = {
+ .set = 0,
+ .i = -1,
+};
+
+SEC("raw_tp/task_rename")
+__auxiliary
+int update_percpu_data(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct_data.nums[6] = 0xc0de;
+ struct_data.set = 1;
+ struct_data.i = 1;
+ nums[6] = 0xc0de;
+ data = 1;
+ run = 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const char fmt[] SEC(".percpu.fmt") = "data %d\n";
+
+SEC("?kprobe")
+__failure __msg("R{{[0-9]+}} points to percpu_array map which cannot be used as const string")
+int verifier_strncmp(void *ctx)
+{
+ return bpf_strncmp("test", 5, fmt);
+}
+
+SEC("?kprobe")
+__failure __msg("R{{[0-9]+}} points to percpu_array map which cannot be used as const string")
+int verifier_snprintf(void *ctx)
+{
+ u64 args[] = { data };
+ char buf[128];
+ int len;
+
+ len = bpf_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), fmt, args, 1);
+ if (len > 0)
+ bpf_printk("snprintf: %s\n", buf);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static volatile const char fmt2[] SEC(".percpu.fmt") = "data %d\n";
+
+SEC("?kprobe")
+__success
+__xlated("r{{[0-9]+}} = &(void __percpu *)(r{{[0-9]+}})")
+int verifier_percpu_read(void *ctx)
+{
+ char c = fmt2[0];
+
+ return c == 'd';
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-14 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-14 13:24 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/8] bpf: Introduce global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-04-14 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/8] bpf: Drop duplicate blank lines in verifier Leon Hwang
2026-04-14 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/8] bpf: Introduce global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-04-14 14:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-14 14:19 ` Leon Hwang
2026-04-15 2:19 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-17 1:30 ` Leon Hwang
2026-04-17 15:48 ` Leon Hwang
2026-04-17 17:03 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-14 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/8] libbpf: Probe percpu data feature Leon Hwang
2026-04-14 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/8] libbpf: Add support for global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-04-14 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/8] bpf: Update per-CPU maps using BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag Leon Hwang
2026-04-14 21:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-17 1:54 ` Leon Hwang
2026-04-15 2:21 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-17 1:33 ` Leon Hwang
2026-04-17 16:07 ` Leon Hwang
2026-04-14 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 6/8] bpftool: Generate skeleton for global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-04-14 21:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-17 2:01 ` Leon Hwang
2026-04-14 13:24 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-04-14 21:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 7/8] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify " sashiko-bot
2026-04-17 2:06 ` Leon Hwang
2026-04-14 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 8/8] selftests/bpf: Add a test to verify bpf_iter for " Leon Hwang
2026-04-14 22:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-17 2:17 ` Leon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260414132421.63409-8-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=qmo@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox