From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Nicolai Buchwitz" <nb@tipi-net.de>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 6/7] net: bcmgenet: add XDP statistics counters
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 20:08:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260416200849.A7891C2BCAF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260416054743.1289191-7-nb@tipi-net.de>
Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s):
- [Medium] Data race and lost increments on global XDP statistics
- [Medium] Missing statistics increment on frame conversion failure
- [Low] Integer overflow of fast-path software statistics
--
commit 7b7f282ba7f7296a985c1fcb93f530101e6a4b26
Author: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>
net: bcmgenet: add XDP statistics counters
This commit adds XDP statistics counters to the bcmgenet driver. It exposes
xdp_pass, xdp_drop, xdp_tx, xdp_tx_err, xdp_redirect, and xdp_redirect_err
via ethtool statistics.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2428,6 +2435,7 @@ static unsigned int bcmgenet_run_xdp(struct bcmgenet_rx_ring *ring,
>
> switch (act) {
> case XDP_PASS:
> + priv->mib.xdp_pass++;
Is it possible for multiple RX queues to execute this concurrently?
Since priv->mib is global to the device, it seems concurrent NAPI contexts
executing on different CPUs could cause data races and lost increments. Should
these counters be tracked per-queue and aggregated, similar to the existing
tx_rings and rx_rings stats64 counters?
> return XDP_PASS;
> case XDP_TX:
> /* Prepend a zeroed TSB (Transmit Status Block). The GENET
[ ... ]
> xdp->data -= sizeof(struct status_64);
> xdp->data_meta -= sizeof(struct status_64);
> memset(xdp->data, 0, sizeof(struct status_64));
>
> xdpf = xdp_convert_buff_to_frame(xdp);
> if (unlikely(!xdpf)) {
> page_pool_put_full_page(ring->page_pool, rx_page,
> true);
Does this code miss a stat increment when xdp_convert_buff_to_frame fails?
It returns XDP_DROP here without incrementing xdp_tx_err or xdp_drop, unlike
the other failure paths in this same block.
> return XDP_DROP;
> }
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.h
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -156,6 +156,12 @@ struct bcmgenet_mib_counters {
> u32 tx_dma_failed;
> u32 tx_realloc_tsb;
> u32 tx_realloc_tsb_failed;
> + u32 xdp_pass;
> + u32 xdp_drop;
> + u32 xdp_tx;
> + u32 xdp_tx_err;
> + u32 xdp_redirect;
> + u32 xdp_redirect_err;
> };
Since these are fast-path software counters for XDP, can they wrap around
quickly on 32-bit types? Would using 64-bit types like u64_stats_t be safer
to avoid silent wrap-arounds for long-term statistics?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260416054743.1289191-1-nb@tipi-net.de?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-16 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-16 5:47 [PATCH net-next v7 0/7] net: bcmgenet: add XDP support Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-04-16 5:47 ` [PATCH net-next v7 2/7] net: bcmgenet: register xdp_rxq_info for each RX ring Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-04-16 5:47 ` [PATCH net-next v7 3/7] net: bcmgenet: add basic XDP support (PASS/DROP) Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-04-16 5:47 ` [PATCH net-next v7 4/7] net: bcmgenet: add XDP_TX support Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-04-16 18:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-16 5:47 ` [PATCH net-next v7 5/7] net: bcmgenet: add XDP_REDIRECT and ndo_xdp_xmit support Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-04-16 19:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-16 5:47 ` [PATCH net-next v7 6/7] net: bcmgenet: add XDP statistics counters Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-04-16 20:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-04-16 5:47 ` [PATCH net-next v7 7/7] net: bcmgenet: reject MTU changes incompatible with XDP Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-04-16 20:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-16 8:06 ` [PATCH net-next v7 0/7] net: bcmgenet: add XDP support Paolo Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260416200849.A7891C2BCAF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nb@tipi-net.de \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox