From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jason Xing" <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 4/4] xsk: fix use-after-free of xs->skb in xsk_build_skb() free_err path
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2026 04:58:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260419045824.D9E5EC2BCAF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260418045644.28612-5-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s):
- [High] Calling `kfree_skb(skb)` in `free_err` after `xsk_skb_init_misc()` triggers premature CQ submission and corrupts Queue invariants.
- [High] Memory leak of `xsk_addr` when `alloc_page()` fails during multi-buffer packet processing.
- [High] On 32-bit architectures, `xsk_skb_destructor_set_addr()` truncates the 64-bit UMEM offset, corrupting the Completion Queue address.
--
commit e60e7fb34b1c59698d11da732db02bb3302ab41a
Author: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
xsk: fix use-after-free of xs->skb in xsk_build_skb() free_err path
When xsk_build_skb() processes multi-buffer packets in copy mode, the
first descriptor stores data into the skb linear area without adding any
frags. If a continuation descriptor fails, the error path frees the skb
while xs->skb still points to it. This patch adds a check to ensure we
only free skbs that were freshly allocated in this call.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260415082654.21026-4-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c
> index 2f00f188533c1..470f6d25ddb93 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xsk.c
> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c
> @@ -974,7 +974,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *xsk_build_skb(struct xdp_sock *xs,
> return skb;
>
> free_err:
> - if (skb && !skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags)
> + if (skb && !xs->skb && !skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags)
> kfree_skb(skb);
This isn't a regression introduced by this patch, but could calling
kfree_skb() here trigger a premature completion queue submission?
If xsk_skb_metadata() fails earlier in the function, the skb destructor
is already set to xsk_destruct_skb by xsk_skb_init_misc().
Freeing the skb here synchronously invokes xsk_destruct_skb(), which
submits the completion to user space and increments the queue producer.
The error path then executes xsk_cq_cancel_locked(), which decrements the
cached producer.
Will this permanently desync the completion queue invariants and report a
successful completion for a failed transmission? Would it be safer to
clear the skb destructor before freeing it?
Also, is there a potential memory leak of the xsk_addr struct when
alloc_page() fails during multi-buffer packet processing?
When processing a continuation descriptor, an xsk_addr struct is
dynamically allocated and stored in skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg
with num_descs set to 1. If the subsequent alloc_page() fails, the code
jumps here to free_err and returns -EAGAIN, leaving the partial packet
in xs->skb for a retry.
If the socket is closed instead of retrying, xsk_drop_skb() is called on
xs->skb, which calls xsk_consume_skb(). Inside xsk_consume_skb(), the
cleanup logic uses this condition:
if (unlikely(num_descs > 1))
Since num_descs is exactly 1, the condition fails. Does this permanently
leak the xsk_addr memory?
Finally, does xsk_skb_destructor_set_addr() truncate the 64-bit umem
offset on 32-bit architectures?
The inline storage attempts to cast the address to uintptr_t:
skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg = (void *)((uintptr_t)addr | 0x1UL);
On 32-bit architectures, uintptr_t is 32 bits, which drops the upper 32
bits of the u64 addr. In af_xdp unaligned mode, the chunk offset is
stored in bits 48-63.
Could this truncation lose the offset entirely, causing
xsk_skb_destructor_get_addr() to retrieve a truncated address and
submit it to the user-space completion queue?
>
> if (err == -EOVERFLOW) {
> if (xs->skb) {
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260418045644.28612-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-19 4:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-18 4:56 [PATCH net 0/4] xsk: fix bugs around xsk skb allocation Jason Xing
2026-04-18 4:56 ` [PATCH net 1/4] xsk: avoid skb leak in XDP_TX_METADATA case Jason Xing
2026-04-19 4:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-19 13:05 ` Jason Xing
2026-04-20 15:22 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-04-20 15:42 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-04-20 16:27 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-04-21 0:55 ` Jason Xing
2026-04-18 4:56 ` [PATCH net 2/4] xsk: free the skb when hitting the upper bound MAX_SKB_FRAGS Jason Xing
2026-04-19 4:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-19 14:03 ` Jason Xing
2026-04-20 15:44 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-04-18 4:56 ` [PATCH net 3/4] xsk: handle NULL dereference of the skb without frags issue Jason Xing
2026-04-19 4:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-19 14:09 ` Jason Xing
2026-04-18 4:56 ` [PATCH net 4/4] xsk: fix use-after-free of xs->skb in xsk_build_skb() free_err path Jason Xing
2026-04-19 4:58 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-04-19 14:23 ` Jason Xing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260419045824.D9E5EC2BCAF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox