public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jason Xing" <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/8] xsk: reject sw-csum UMEM binding to IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR devices
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 09:40:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260421094022.8D0EAC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260420082805.14844-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>

Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s):
- [High] The patch unconditionally rejects pool assignment for devices with IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR if tx_sw_csum is enabled, which incorrectly breaks native Zero-Copy (ZC) setups on those devices.
--

commit 5beba1aaed8c200424f98af3c07472ab4da8d451
Author: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>

xsk: reject sw-csum UMEM binding to IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR devices

This commit rejects UMEM bindings for devices that advertise
IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR when software checksumming (tx_sw_csum) is enabled.
This prevents a warning and panic in skb_checksum_help() which relies on a
linear skb head.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260419045822.843BFC2BCAF@smtp.kernel.org/#t

> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
> index cd7bc50872f6b..d981cfdd85357 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ int xp_assign_dev(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
>  	if (force_zc && force_copy)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	if (pool->tx_sw_csum && (netdev->priv_flags & IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR))
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +

Does this unconditionally reject the pool assignment even for native
Zero-Copy (ZC) setups?

In native XDP_ZEROCOPY mode, AF_XDP descriptors are sent directly to the
hardware. No sk_buff is allocated, so skb_checksum_help() is never called,
making the tx_sw_csum flag irrelevant and safe to ignore.

By placing this check before determining if native ZC is available, does
this break ZC mode on drivers like virtio_net for applications that pass
the XDP_UMEM_TX_SW_CSUM flag as a fallback?

Should this check be deferred until we are certain we are using generic
copy mode, such as when force_copy is true or after native ZC setup fails?

>  	if (xsk_get_pool_from_qid(netdev, queue_id))
>  		return -EBUSY;
>

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260420082805.14844-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com?part=1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-21  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-20  8:27 [PATCH net v2 0/8] xsk: fix bugs around xsk skb allocation Jason Xing
2026-04-20  8:27 ` [PATCH net v2 1/8] xsk: reject sw-csum UMEM binding to IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR devices Jason Xing
2026-04-20 19:34   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-04-20 23:51     ` Jason Xing
2026-04-21 22:20       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-04-21  9:40   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-04-21 12:39     ` Jason Xing
2026-04-20  8:27 ` [PATCH net v2 2/8] xsk: handle NULL dereference of the skb without frags issue Jason Xing
2026-04-20 19:34   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-04-21  9:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21 12:46     ` Jason Xing
2026-04-20  8:28 ` [PATCH net v2 3/8] xsk: fix use-after-free of xs->skb in xsk_build_skb() free_err path Jason Xing
2026-04-20 19:34   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-04-21  0:01     ` Jason Xing
2026-04-21  9:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21 12:51     ` Jason Xing
2026-04-20  8:28 ` [PATCH net v2 4/8] xsk: prevent CQ desync when freeing half-built skbs in xsk_build_skb() Jason Xing
2026-04-20 19:34   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-04-21  0:51     ` Jason Xing
2026-04-20  8:28 ` [PATCH net v2 5/8] xsk: avoid skb leak in XDP_TX_METADATA case Jason Xing
2026-04-21  9:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21 12:58     ` Jason Xing
2026-04-20  8:28 ` [PATCH net v2 6/8] xsk: free the skb when hitting the upper bound MAX_SKB_FRAGS Jason Xing
2026-04-20  8:28 ` [PATCH net v2 7/8] xsk: fix xsk_addrs slab leak on multi-buffer error path Jason Xing
2026-04-20 19:58   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-04-20  8:28 ` [PATCH net v2 8/8] xsk: fix u64 descriptor address truncation on 32-bit architectures Jason Xing
2026-04-20 19:49   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-04-21  0:49     ` Jason Xing
2026-04-21 22:23       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-04-22  2:54         ` Jason Xing
2026-04-21  9:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21 13:01     ` Jason Xing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260421094022.8D0EAC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox