From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dipayaan Roy" <dipayanroy@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: mana: remove double CQ cleanup in mana_create_rxq error path
Date: Fri, 01 May 2026 04:03:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260501040301.282FEC2BCB7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430035935.1859220-4-dipayanroy@linux.microsoft.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Uninitialized CQ ID in error path clobbers global `cq_table[0]`
- [High] Uninitialized `tx_object` handles in `mana_create_txq` error path destroy valid WQ object 0
--
commit fbbff2b6d2993ad6206b12c69d7d995282d02696
Author: Dipayaan Roy <dipayanroy@linux.microsoft.com>
net: mana: remove double CQ cleanup in mana_create_rxq error path
This commit removes a redundant mana_deinit_cq() call in the error path of
mana_create_rxq(). Previously, mana_destroy_rxq() was called first, which
already cleans up the CQ and frees the rxq structure. The subsequent
mana_deinit_cq() call caused a use-after-free by accessing the embedded
CQ from the already-freed structure.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> index f2a6ea162dc3..9afc786b297a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> @@ -2799,9 +2799,6 @@ static struct mana_rxq *mana_create_rxq(struct mana_port_context *apc,
>
> mana_destroy_rxq(apc, rxq, false);
This isn't a bug introduced by this commit, but while reviewing this error
path I noticed a pre-existing issue. Does this sequence clobber the global
cq_table[0]?
When mana_gd_create_mana_wq_cq() allocates a queue via kzalloc_obj(),
queue->id is initialized to 0.
The actual hardware queue ID is only assigned later when
mana_create_wq_obj() successfully completes.
If mana_create_wq_obj() fails in mana_create_rxq(), the error path calls:
mana_destroy_rxq() -> mana_deinit_cq() -> mana_gd_destroy_queue() ->
mana_gd_destroy_cq()
Inside mana_gd_destroy_cq(), it uses queue->id (which is still 0) to clear
the gc->cq_table[id] array entry:
mana_gd_destroy_cq() {
u32 id = queue->id;
...
gc->cq_table[id] = NULL;
}
This unintentionally clobbers the cq_table entry for CQ 0, which is a
valid queue ID (e.g., belonging to the hardware control channel or
another active queue).
Could this lead to dropped completions for CQ 0 and potentially hang the
device? Should queue->id be explicitly initialized to INVALID_QUEUE_ID?
I also noticed a similar pre-existing issue in the mana_create_txq()
error path. Can this destroy valid WQ object 0?
In mana_create_txq(), apc->tx_qp is allocated using kzalloc_objs(), meaning
all tx_object fields initially default to 0.
The initialization loop sets tx_object = INVALID_MANA_HANDLE iteratively.
If queue creation fails midway (e.g., at i = 0), mana_create_txq() jumps to
the error path and calls mana_destroy_txq().
mana_destroy_txq() loops over all apc->num_queues and unconditionally calls
mana_destroy_wq_obj(apc, GDMA_SQ, apc->tx_qp[i].tx_object).
For the queue indices that were not yet reached by the initialization loop,
tx_object remains 0. Because 0 is a valid hardware handle, this issues
spurious hardware requests to destroy WQ object 0 multiple times.
Could this inadvertently destroy an active queue belonging to another VF/PF
or the hardware control channel? Should all tx_object handles be initialized
to INVALID_MANA_HANDLE before the queue creation loop begins?
> - if (cq)
> - mana_deinit_cq(apc, cq);
> -
> return NULL;
> }
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260430035935.1859220-1-dipayanroy@linux.microsoft.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-01 4:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-30 3:57 [PATCH 0/3] net: mana: Fix mana_destroy_rxq() cleanup for partial RXQ init Dipayaan Roy
2026-04-30 3:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] net: mana: check xdp_rxq registration before unreg in mana_destroy_rxq() Dipayaan Roy
2026-05-01 4:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-30 3:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] net: mana: Skip WQ object destruction for uninitialized RXQ Dipayaan Roy
2026-05-01 4:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-30 3:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] net: mana: remove double CQ cleanup in mana_create_rxq error path Dipayaan Roy
2026-04-30 4:14 ` Aditya Garg
2026-05-01 4:03 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-02 16:52 ` [PATCH 0/3] net: mana: Fix mana_destroy_rxq() cleanup for partial RXQ init Simon Horman
2026-05-03 3:38 ` Dipayaan Roy
2026-05-05 10:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260501040301.282FEC2BCB7@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dipayanroy@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox