BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Lehner <dev@der-flo.net>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	memxor@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	kuba@kernel.org, hawk@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
	sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com, Florian Lehner <dev@der-flo.net>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2 v3] selftests/bpf: Test LINK_DETACH for perf link
Date: Fri,  1 May 2026 18:09:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260501160901.224134-3-dev@der-flo.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260501160901.224134-1-dev@der-flo.net>

Add test_perf_link_detach() to verify that the new LINK_DETACH support for
BPF perf links works correctly. The test creates a link to a BPF program
for a software perf event, confirms the program is executed, calls
bpf_link_detach() to exercise the BPF_LINK_DETACH syscall path, and then
verifies the program is no longer invoked after detach.

Signed-off-by: Florian Lehner <dev@der-flo.net>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_link.c      | 79 ++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_link.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_link.c
index 9e3a0d217af8..b75112c1b67d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_link.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_link.c
@@ -18,29 +18,84 @@ static void burn_cpu(void)
 		barrier();
 }
 
-void test_perf_link(void)
+static int perf_link_setup(struct test_perf_link **skel, int *pfd)
 {
-	struct test_perf_link *skel = NULL;
 	struct perf_event_attr attr;
-	int pfd = -1, link_fd = -1, err;
-	int run_cnt_before, run_cnt_after;
-	struct bpf_link_info info;
-	__u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
-	__u64 timeout_time_ns;
 
-	/* create perf event */
 	memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(attr));
 	attr.size = sizeof(attr);
 	attr.type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE;
 	attr.config = PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_CLOCK;
 	attr.freq = 1;
 	attr.sample_freq = 1000;
-	pfd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, 0, -1, -1, PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC);
-	if (!ASSERT_GE(pfd, 0, "perf_fd"))
+	*pfd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, 0, -1, -1, PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(*pfd, 0, "perf_fd"))
+		return -1;
+
+	*skel = test_perf_link__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(*skel, "skel_load"))
+		return -1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void test_perf_link_detach(void)
+{
+	struct test_perf_link *skel = NULL;
+	int pfd = -1, link_fd = -1, err;
+	int run_cnt_before, run_cnt_after;
+	__u64 timeout_time_ns;
+
+	if (perf_link_setup(&skel, &pfd))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	link_fd = bpf_link_create(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.handler), pfd,
+				  BPF_PERF_EVENT, NULL);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(link_fd, 0, "link_fd"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
-	skel = test_perf_link__open_and_load();
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_load"))
+	/* ensure we get at least one perf_event prog execution */
+	timeout_time_ns = get_time_ns() + BURN_TIMEOUT_NS;
+	while (true) {
+		burn_cpu();
+		if (skel->bss->run_cnt > 0)
+			break;
+		if (!ASSERT_LT(get_time_ns(), timeout_time_ns, "run_cnt_timeout"))
+			goto cleanup;
+	}
+
+	/* detach via BPF_LINK_DETACH - BPF program should no longer be executed */
+	err = bpf_link_detach(link_fd);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "link_detach"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/* make sure there are no stragglers */
+	kern_sync_rcu();
+
+	run_cnt_before = skel->bss->run_cnt;
+	burn_cpu();
+	run_cnt_after = skel->bss->run_cnt;
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(run_cnt_before, run_cnt_after, "run_cnt_detached");
+
+cleanup:
+	if (link_fd >= 0)
+		close(link_fd);
+	if (pfd >= 0)
+		close(pfd);
+	test_perf_link__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+void test_perf_link(void)
+{
+	struct test_perf_link *skel = NULL;
+	int pfd = -1, link_fd = -1, err;
+	int run_cnt_before, run_cnt_after;
+	struct bpf_link_info info;
+	__u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
+	__u64 timeout_time_ns;
+
+	if (perf_link_setup(&skel, &pfd))
 		goto cleanup;
 
 	link_fd = bpf_link_create(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.handler), pfd,
-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-01 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-01 16:08 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2 v3] bpf: Add LINK_DETACH for perf links Florian Lehner
2026-05-01 16:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2 v3] bpf: Add LINK_DETACH support for perf link Florian Lehner
2026-05-01 16:52   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-01 16:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-01 16:09 ` Florian Lehner [this message]
2026-05-01 17:11   ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2 v3] selftests/bpf: Test LINK_DETACH " sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 13:14   ` Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260501160901.224134-3-dev@der-flo.net \
    --to=dev@der-flo.net \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox